Advanced Search Results

Surender Singh and anr. Vs. Delhi Development Authority and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

65 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:25. 11.2014 W.P.(C) 6897/2014 & CM162692014 SURENDER SINGH & ANR. ..... Petitioners versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS. ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in...

Lt. Col. Kameshwar Prasad Bodoni and anr. Vs. Oil and Natural Gas Corp ...

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Service

Acts : Oil and Natural Gas Commission (Terms and Condition of the appointment and Service) Regulation, 1975

Advocate for Appellant : B.P. Katakey, R. Sarmah and D.K. Mishra, Advs.

P.G. Agarwal, J. 1. As submitted by the learned counsel for both sides, both the writ petitions were heard analogously and disposed of by this common judgment as the question of law involved is identical. 2....

The State of Assam, Represented by the Commissioner and Secy and Other ...

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Choudhury

Judgment and Order Katakey, J. 1. The State of Assam, represented by the Commissioner and Secretary, Home Department, as well as the Superintendent of Police, Barpeta, have filed the Review Petition No.22/2010 seeking review of the...

Heritage Engineer and Developers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of Assam and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Criminal

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. R. Sharma

B.K. Sharma, J.1. This writ petition is directed against the proceeding initiated Under Section 144 of the Cr. P.C. and the order passed therein restraining the petitioner from entering into the disputed Flat with further direction...

State of West Bengal Vs. Smt. Rama Devi and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 137

Reported in : AIR2002Cal235

ORDERSengupta, J. 1. In this matter the plaintiff has concluded examination-in-chief, the defendant No. 3, who is pro forma defendant being represented by Mr. Das, Senior Counsel, wants to cross examine friendly the witness of the...

Girish Chandra Ojha Vs. Sriram Amritlal Ojha and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Contempt of Court

ORDER SHEET CC No.99 of 2013 With CS No.164 of 2004 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA ORIGINAL SIDE GIRISH CHANDRA OJHA Versus SRIRAM AMRITLAL OJHA & ORS.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE SOUMEN SEN Date : 27th...

Mahanadi Coalfields Ltd. Vs. M/s Ivrcl Amr Joint Venture

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Arbitration

Advocate for Appellant : SIDDHARTH JAIN __

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No 4914 of 2022 (Arising out of SLP(C) No 1098 of 2020) Mahanadi Coalfields Ltd & Anr .... Appellant(s) Versus M/s IVRCL AMR JOINT...

B.J. Bhambhani Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Orissa

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 184, 184(7), 185, 185(3), 246 and 246(1)

Reported in : (1991)94CTR(Ori)166; [1991]190ITR480(Orissa)

Advocate for Appellant : S.C. Ghose and ;R. Sharma, Advs.

S.C. Mohapatra, J.1. This is a reference under Section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'), at the instance of the assessee.2. The assessee is a firm. Since the assessment year...

Md. Atar Rahman Vs. Mustt. Sahajun Begum

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Criminal

Acts : The Muslim Women Act 1986 - Section 3(2); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) (Cr.P.C) - Section 482

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. A. Sharif; Mr. N. Ahmed, Advs.

1. The opposite party herein made an application, under Section 3(2) of the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986, in the Court of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Morigaon, Assam, seeking an order...

Neelam Dubey Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Education

INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI L.P.ANo.185of2013 NeelamDubeyVs.TheStateofJharkhand&Ors. CORAM: HON'BLETHECHIEFJUSTICE HON'BLEMRS.JUSTICEJAYAROY FortheAppellant/Petitioner:Mr.R.Sharma,Snr.Adv. FortheRespondentState:JCtoGPV FortheRespondentA.G:JCtoMr.S.Srivastava OrderNo.3 Dated23 rd July,2013 Admit. Noneedtoissuenoticeastherespondentshavealreadyputin appearance. Sinceshortissueisinvovled,thismattermaybelistforfinal disposalinthemonthofSeptember,2013. The respondents are directed to make payment of the the amountrecoveredtotheappellantwithinaperiodofsixweeksfrom today.However,theappellantwillbeunderobligationtorepaythe same,ifshefailsinthisappeal.Sofarastheclaimforpaymentof interest over the recovered amount...