Advanced Search Results

The Tamil Nadu Electricity Board Vs. R. Srinivasan

Court : Chennai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 2(1) and (18), 122 and 125 - Order 3, Rule 4(1) (2) and (5), 5 and 6 - Order 2, Rule 4(3); Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR1992Mad40; (1991)IIMLJ635

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. R. Muthukumaraswamy, Adv. for ;Mr. K.P.H. Thulasiraman

ORDERNainar Sundaram, J.1. The writ appeal has been preferred against the order of the learned single Judge in W.P. No. 11437 of 1981. There is no gainsaying that the writ petition is one preferred under Article...

Leo Candles Represented by Its Proprietor, Trichy Vs. the Industries C ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Constitution

Reported in : (1992)1MLJ12

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. R. Muthukumaraswamy

ORDERBakthavatsalam, J.1. The prayer in the writ petition is to issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to grant a quota of 35 bags (50 kgs. each) of Standard Grade Paraffin Wax (Type II), per...

G. Chandrasekhar Vs. Chairman, Madras Port Trust

Court : Chennai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Major Port Trusts Act, 1963 - Sections 24, 24(1), 25(1), 124(1) and 132; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 - Sections 5(1) and 5(2); Madras Port Trust Employees' (Classification, Control and Appeal) Regulation, 1988 - Regulation 7(8)

Reported in : (1990)IILLJ5Mad

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. R. Muthukumaraswamy

ORDER1. The petitioner has come up before this Court praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent to pay the petitioner the enhanced subsistence allowance payable to him with effect from 4th December...

S. Srinivasan Vs. the Govt. of Tamil Nadu Reptd. by Commr. and Secy. t ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Service

Reported in : (1984)2MLJ484

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. R. Muthukumaraswamy

ORDERS. Nainar Sundaram, J.1. This writ petition has got to be allowed on a very convincing point and definitely an unimpeachable point on the facts of the case, read along with the Rules relied on by...

M/S.Fayshaw Apparels, and ors.Vs. the Appellate Tribunal for Foreign E ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr.R.Muthukumaraswamy; Mr.G.Derrick Sam, Advs.

1. These Appeals arise out of the Order of Appellate Tribunal for Foreign Exchange, New Delhi dated 28.5.2010 in Appeal Nos.91, 92, 93 and 94 of 2010 rejecting the applications for dispensation of pre-deposit and directing...

M/S.Fayshaw Apparels. Vs. Mr.B.P.Byram Shaw Managing Partner of M/S.Fa ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Foreign Exchange Management

Acts : Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 - Section 35

Advocate for Appellant : Mr.R.Muthukumaraswamy, Adv.

1. These Appeals arise out of the Order of Appellate Tribunal for Foreign Exchange, New Delhi dated 28.5.2010 in Appeal Nos.91, 92, 93 and 94 of 2010 rejecting the applications for dispensation of pre-deposit and directing...

R.V. Ramalingam Vs. Abdul Muthaliff

Court : Chennai

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960 - Sections 18-A and 23

Reported in : AIR1993Mad158

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. R. Muthukumaraswami, Adv.

ORDER1. The respondent-landlord filed R.C.O.P. No. 30 of 1989 on the file of the Rent Controller/District Munsif, Thiruvarur, for eviction of the petitioner-tenant from the premises in question on the ground of wilful default, act of...

Dr.K.Meena Vs. State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by Secretary to Govern ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution Of Indian - Article 226

Advocate for Appellant : Mr.R.Muthukumaraswamy, Adv.

1. The petitioner has come up with this writ petition challenging the orders by which her request for voluntary retirement was rejected.2. I have heard Mr.R.Muthukumaraswamy, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioner. Mr.K.H.Ravikumar, learned Government...

T.A. Naufal Rizwan (Minor) Rep by His Father S. Abubacker Vs. the Stat ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India -- Articles 14, 15(4) and 16

Reported in : 1999(3)CTC253

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. R. Muthukumaraswamy, ;Mr. S.T.S. Murthy, ;Mr. M.M. Sundaresh, ;Mr. Abdul Nazeer, ;Mr. N. Murali Kumaran, Adv.

ORDER1. In all these writ petitions, the revised norms of rural reservation in under challenge. Based on the recommendation of a High Level Committee that because of the locational advantage with regard to schools, coaching for...

K.V.Karthalingan Vs. the Governent of Tamilnadu

Court : Chennai

Subject : Education

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 30.06.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU W.P.No.10668 of 2014 and M.P.No.2 of 2014 K.V.KARTHALINGAN ..Petitioner versus 1 THE GOVERNENT OF TAMILNADU REP BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY...