Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: mr r krishnamurthy · Page 1 of about 192 results (0.477 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 05 1998

Shrine Basilica of Our Lady of Health Vailankanni, Vailankanni, Nagai ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-05-1998

Subject : Other taxes

Acts : Constitution of India -- Articles 243-10 and 265 and Schedule 7, List 2, Entry 59; Tamil Nadu District Municipalities Act, 1920 -- Sections 78 and 78-A, 79, 116, 156, 270(1-A, B, C and D); Tolls Act, 1851-- Sections 3

Reported in : 1998(2)CTC327; (1998)IIIMLJ382

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. R. Krishnamurthi,;Senior Counsel for Mr. A. Fathimanathan, Adv.

ORDERJudgement Pronounced by E. Padmanabhan, J.1. The present Writ Appeal has been preferred being aggrieved by the order of dismissal dated 29.12.1997 passed in W.P. No.12846 of 1997 on the file of this court.2. This court...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 24 2000

R.M. Rajendran and Another Vs. Recovery Officer (of Indian Bank) Debt ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-24-2000

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 -- Sections 2, 19 (4 and 7) 104(2) -- Order 21 -- Order 34, Rule 1 -- Order 37, Rule 1 -- Order 43, Rule 1; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 -- Sections 19, 52 and 53; Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 -- Sections 4 and 31; Income Tax Act, 1961; Constitution of India -- Articles 32 and 226

Reported in : [2001]104CompCas19(Mad); 2000(2)CTC99; (2000)IIMLJ171

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. R.Krishnamurthy, Senior Counsel for ;Mr. S.D.N. Vimalanathan, Adv.

ORDER1. Petitioners in C.M.P. No.1704 of 1999 in C.M.A. No.211 of 1999 on the file of IV Additional Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai are the appellants in the above appeal. They filed the present appeal under...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 22 2010

M/S.Apeejay Surendra Park Hotels Ltd., Vs. State of Tamil Nadu, and or ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jun-22-2010

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution Of India - Article 226

Advocate for Appellant : Mr.R.Krishnamurthy, Adv.

1. This writ petition is filed by the petitioner Company seeking for a direction to forbear the respondents from interfering with the petitioner's possession of the property situated at No.601, Anna Salai, Chennai-600 002 and to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 05 1989

M.K. Chubby Raj Vs. State Bank of India

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-05-1989

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : State Bank of India Act, 1955 - Sections 4, 4(3), 43 and 43(1); Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970; Bank Nationalization Act - Sections 12; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16 and 19(1)

Reported in : (1990)IILLJ474Mad

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. R. Krishnamurthi

ORDERS. Mohan, Offg. C.J.1. The short facts leading to the writ appeal are as follows : 2. The first respondent-Bank was constituted under the State Bank of India Act, 1955 (Act 23 of 1955). The said...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 16 1976

S. Venkataraman Vs. the Deputy Registrar of Co-operative Societies and ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-16-1976

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Reported in : (1978)1MLJ284

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. R. Krishnamurthi

ORDERS. Mohan, J.1. This writ petition is filed to quash the order of the first respondent (Deputy Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Thanjavur) made in R.C. No. 16758/68-E dated 3rd April, 1970 as confirmed by the second...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 15 1989

The District Collector and ors. Vs. S.R. Pitchai

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-15-1989

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1990)1MLJ106

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. R. Krishnamurthy

ORDERSathiadev, J.1. The three respondents in W.P. No. 9485 of 1989 are the appellants and the writ petitioner is the sole respondent herein. (Ranking of parties as in writ petition).2. The petitioner filed the writ petition...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 31 1999

K. Ayyamuthu and Others Vs. the State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by Its Secret ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-31-1999

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 -- Sections 3, 4(1) & 6

Reported in : 1999(2)CTC17

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. R. Krishnamurthy, Senior Counsel for ;Mr. V. Ayyathurai, Adv.

ORDER1. Aggrieved by the acquisition proceedings initiated by the respondents, the petitioners have filed the above writ petitions to quash those proceedings on various grounds.2. Since identical grounds have been raised in all these cases, the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 10 1991

Little Brothers of the Oppressed Vs. the Government of India and anr.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-10-1991

Subject : FERA

Reported in : 1992(38)ECC318

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. R. Krishnamurthi

ORDERSomasundaram, J.1. The petitioner in both the writ petitions is a society registered under the Tamil Nadu Societies Registration Act. According to the petitioner, the activities of the society are secular and its objects are to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 07 1991

Protchem Industries (India) Ltd., Represented by Its Managing Director ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : May-07-1991

Subject : ContractArbitration

Reported in : (1991)1MLJ519

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. R. Krishnamurthy

Lakshmanan, J.1. This suit was filed by the plaintiff to pass an order of reference of the disputes between the plaintiff and the defendants to an Arbitrator to be appointed by this Court to adjudicate and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 15 1989

The Talayar Tea Company Limited Vs. the Union of India and anr.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-15-1989

Subject : Company

Reported in : (1990)1MLJ466

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. R. Krishnamurthy

Sathiadev, J.1. These writ appeals are preferred against the common judgment in W.P.No. 3343 and 3538 to 3543 of 1983, dated 31-3-1989. The writ petitions were filed against the order of the Company Law Board, dated...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial