Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: mr prashant bhushan · Page 1 of about 219 results (0.428 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 06 2011

Jahid Shaikh and ors. Vs. State of Gujarat and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-06-2011

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) (Cr.P.C) - Section 406, 207, 154 ,164, 227, 208, 406; Constitution of India - Article 21

1. This Transfer Petition has been filed by one Jahid and 62 other Petitioners under Section 406 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for transfer of Sessions Case No.38 of 2009 pending before the Special Judge,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 30 2010

Arvind Kejriwal Vs Central Public Information Officer.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-30-2010

Subject : Right to Information

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Prashant Bhushan , Ms. Girija Kishan Verma , Mr. Rishikesh Kumar, Advs.

1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? Yes3. Whether the judgment should be reported in Digest? Yes 1. A short but...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 16 2010

Dr.K.C.Bajaj and ors. Vs Uoi and anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-16-2010

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr.Prashant Bhushan, Mr.Sumeet Sharma , Mr.Bhanu Sood, Advs.

1. Whether the Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?2. To be referred to Reporter or not?3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?ORDER.1. This batch of writ petitions (15...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 02 2010

Brig. (Retd.) Ujjal Dasgupta Vs Cabinet Secretariat

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-02-2010

Subject : Right to Information

Acts : Right to Information Act (RTI), 2005, Sections 24 (1), 8 (1)(a),8 (1)(h)

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Prashant Bhushan ; Mr. Rohit Kumar Singh ; Mr. Pranav Sachdeva, Advs.

1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? Yes3. Whether the judgment should be reported in Digest? Yes1. This petition, which challenges...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 07 2000

Arun Kumar Aggarwal Vs. Prasar Bharati

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-07-2000

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2000(55)DRJ88

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Prashant Bhushan, Adv

ORDERManmohan Sarin, J.1. Petitioner has filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ in the nature of mandamus, directing the respondent to make available copies of the documents pertaining...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 15 1998

Anup Razdan (Dr.) Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-15-1998

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 226

Reported in : 1998VAD(Delhi)18; 74(1998)DLT627; 1998(46)DRJ336

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Prashant Bhushan, Adv

ORDERK. Ramamoorthy, J. 1. The petitioner has prayed for quashing the nomination of respondents 3 to 6 for the MDS course against the seats reserved for Central Government nominees at King George Medical College, Lucknow for...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 02 2010

Bano Bee Vs Union of India and Another

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-02-2010

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr.Prashant Bhushan with Mr.Rohit Kr. Singh , Mr.Pranav Sachdeva, Advs.

1. Whether reporters of the local papers be allowed to see the judgment?2. To be referred to the Reporter or not?3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?ORDER1.In this public interest litigation, the petitioner...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 17 2007

Union Public Service Commission Vs. Centran Information Commission and ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-17-2007

Subject : Right to Information

Acts : Right to Information Act (RTI), 2005 - Sections 8, 8(1), 8(2), 9, 18(1), 19(1) and 19(3); Civil Services Examination Rules, 2006

Reported in : 139(2007)DLT608

Advocate for Appellant : S.K. Mishra, Sr. Adv. and; Anuj Rajput and; Rahul Chauhan

Badar Durrez Ahmed, J.1. The Union Public Service Commission (UPSC) has filed this writ petition praying for the setting aside of the order dated 13.11.2006 passed by the Central Information Commission, New Delhi in an appeal...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 06 2014

Dr.Subramanian Swamy Vs. Director, Cbi and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-06-2014

Subject : Right to Information

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Prashant Bhushan

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.38 OF1997Dr. Subramanian Swamy …… Petitioner Versus Director, Central Bureau of Investigation & Anr. …… Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.21 OF2004Centre for...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 16 2015

Supreme Court Advocates-On-Record Association and Anr. Vs. Union of In ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-16-2015

Subject : MRTP

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.13 OF2015Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record - Association and another … Petitioner(s) versus Union of India … Respondent(s) With |WRIT PETITION (C) No.14 OF2015| |WRIT...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial