Advanced Search Results

In the Matter Of: Century Rayon (a Division of Century Textiles and In ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Subject : MRTP

Advocate for Appellant : For the Appellant: Mr. Prakash Shah, Senior Counsel, Mr. O.P. Gaggar, Mr. Shirish Gupte, Advocates. For the Respondents: Mr. Ravi Prakash, Mr. Varun Aggarwal and Mr. Abishek Mitra for MSEDCL, Mr. Budd

PER HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M. KARPAGA VINAYAGAM, CHAIRPERSON 1. M/s Century Rayon, Maharashtra is the Appellant herein. 2. It is a textile company. In its plant, it has installed a cogeneration unit. The State Commission passed...

Subhiksha Trading Services Ltd. Vs. Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Company Law

Acts : Companies Act - Sections 391, 394; Company Court Rules - Rule 21

Advocate for Appellant : Mr.Prakash Goklaney, Adv.

This application is filed by the respondent to dismiss C.P.No.68 of 2009. 2. C.P.No.68 of 2009 was filed by the respondent in this application to pass an order of winding up of the applicant company. Alongwith...

Salem Co-operative Sugar Mills Ltd. Vs. Collr. of C. Ex., Madras

Court : Chennai

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985

Reported in : 1997(93)ELT30(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Prakash, ;Adv. for M/s. C. Natarajan and ;Inbarajan

Rain, J.1. The above reference has been made under Section 35G of the Central Excise and Salt Act, 1944 at the instance of the assessee Manufacturer, by referring the following for our determination and opinion :...

Vinayak Bhiva Bhilare Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Municipal Tax

Acts : Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporations (BPMC) Act, 1949 - Section 5, 5(3); Maharashtra Municipal Councils, Nagar Panchayats and Industrial Townships Act, 1965 - Section 10, 10(2); Constitution of India - Article 243R, 243S, 81, 141

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Avinash Avhad; Mr. Prakash Ambedkar, Advs.

1. Rule, returnable forthwith. The learned counsel for the respective respondents waive service. Heard finally by consent of parties. 2. In both these petitions, the petitioners have challenged Act No. XXVI of 2011 by which interalia,...

M/S. Subhiksha Trading Services Ltd. and anr. Vs. Mrs.V. Sumitra

Court : Chennai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Tamil Nadu Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act - Section 11

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Prakash Goklaney, Adv.

These two civil revision petitions are filed against the order dated 11.8.2011 passed by the VII Judge, Court of Small Causes, (Appellate Authority) Chennai in M.P.Nos. 377 and 378 of 2011 in RCA Nos. 371 and...

Mr. Ramakant G. Gawas Vs. Cidco, Cidco Bhavan, New Mumbai

Court : Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Mumbai

Subject : MRTP

Advocate for Appellant : Ms. Yookti Goplani, Advocate for Complainant. Mr. Prakash Kadam, Advocate for Opposite Party.

Oral Order:- Per Shri S.R. Khanzode, Honble Presiding Judicial Member. Complainant, who is a prospective buyer of a flat in the area of New Mumbai from CIDCO, had registered himself under the scheme, “Demand Registration Survey...

Anirudh Prasad Yadav Alias Sadhu Yadav Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and or ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Media and CommunicationConstitution

Acts : Cinematograph Act, 1952 - Sections 5B; Cinematograph Certification Rules, (1983) - Rule 32; Constitution of India - Articles 19(1) and 226

Reported in : AIR2004All123; 2004(28)PTC559(All)

1. Petitioner-Anirudh Prasad Yadav alias Sadhu Yadav, said to be an Ex. M.L.C. and sitting Member of Legislative Assembly, State of Bihar has approached this Court with a prayer that a writ in the nature of...

Ishita Kunal Sangani Vs. Kunal Sudhir Sangani

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Oral Order: A.R. Joshi, J. 1. Heard rival submissions at length on this Appeal preferred by the present Petitioner-wife challenging the order below Exh. 1 dated 30.7.2014 by which the application Exh. 28 preferred by the...

Mr. Pakash Vasant Keni Vs. the Chairman/Secretary Bhanu Chs Ltd., Behi ...

Court : Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Complainant Mr. Prakash Vasant Keni in Person.

Oral Order:- Per Shri P.N. Kashalkar, Honble Presiding Judicial Member We heard complainant-Mr. Prakash Vasant Keni in person. Looking to the prayers made in the prayer clauses in Para 8 of the complaint, we are finding...

Dy. Cit Vs. Rajiv A. Shah

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

1. Since common issue is involved in all these appeals, the same are being disposed of by the common order for the sake of convenience.2. The only issue common to all the appeals is, whether the...