Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: mr pawan · Page 1 of about 1,312 results (0.253 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Oct 12 2011

Shri Bhagwan Sharma Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Oct-12-2011

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 302, 120B, 201, 403, 404, 411, 419, 392, 397, 34; Indian Evidence Act - Section 27; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Section 313

Advocate for Appellant : Mr Sarfaraz Hussain; Mr Masood Hussain, Advs.

1. These six appeals arise out of the common judgment dated 18.03.2008 delivered by the Additional Sessions Judge, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi whereby the appellants Ravi Kant Sharma, Shri Bhagwan, Satya Prakash and Pradeep Sharma were convicted...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 12 2011

State Vs. Ved Prakash Sharma

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Oct-12-2011

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 302, 120B, 201, 403, 404, 411, 419, 392, 397, 34; Indian Evidence Act - Section 27; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Section 313

Advocate for Appellant : Mr Sarfaraz Hussain; Mr Masood Hussain, Advs.

1. These six appeals arise out of the common judgment dated 18.03.2008 delivered by the Additional Sessions Judge, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi whereby the appellants Ravi Kant Sharma, Shri Bhagwan, Satya Prakash and Pradeep Sharma were convicted...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 12 2011

State Vs. Ved Prakash @ Kalu

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Oct-12-2011

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 302, 120B, 201, 403, 404, 411, 419, 392, 397, 34; Indian Evidence Act - Section 27; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Section 313

Advocate for Appellant : Mr Sarfaraz Hussain; Mr Masood Hussain, Advs.

1. These six appeals arise out of the common judgment dated 18.03.2008 delivered by the Additional Sessions Judge, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi whereby the appellants Ravi Kant Sharma, Shri Bhagwan, Satya Prakash and Pradeep Sharma were convicted...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 08 2000

Lakh Raj Agarwal Vs. Foreign Exchange Regulation Appellate Board

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-08-2000

Subject : FERACriminal

Acts : Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1947 - Sections 5(1) and 23

Reported in : 2001IIAD(Delhi)334; 89(2001)DLT392; 2001(75)ECC517

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Pawan Bahl, Adv. amices Curia

ORDERDalveer Bhandari, J. (Oral)1. This appeal is directed against the order of the Chairman, Foreign Exchange Regulation Appellate Board dated 21.12.1976.2. The charge against the appellant is that during the year 1969 the appellant without the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 15 2010

Deputy Commissioner of Police Vs. D.K.Sharma

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Dec-15-2010

Subject : Right to Information

Acts : Right to Information Act (RTI), 2005 - Section 8 (1); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 172 (2), 208

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Pawan Sharma; Mr. Sanjay Lao; Mr. Laxmi Chauhan, Advs.

1. The Deputy Commissioner of Police, Anti Corruption Branch ('DCP') is aggrieved by an order dated 25th September 2009 passed by the Central Information Commission ('CIC') directing the Petitioner DCP to provide to the Respondent copies...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 17 2001

Shri Ramesh Kumar Sharma Vs. the Ambassador, Royal Netherlands Embassy ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-17-2001

Subject : Service

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 11, 86, 86(1), 86(2) and 151 - Order 7, Rule 11; Foreign Service Regulations, 1951 - Article 89; Constitution of India - Article 32; Slum Clearance Act

Reported in : 94(2001)DLT615; 2002(62)DRJ581

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Pawan Upadhyay, Adv

Manmohan Sarin, J.1. By this order, defendant's application under Order VII Rule 11 read with Section 151 CPC for rejection of the plaint is being disposed of.The plaintiff's suit is fora decree against the defendant, for...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 19 2000

Mohd. Miraz @ Munna Vs. State (Not of Delhi)

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Dec-19-2000

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 21; Cr. Procedure Code, 1973 - Sections 164

Reported in : 2001IIIAD(Delhi)437; 90(2001)DLT702

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Pawan Sharma, Adv

ORDERUsha Mehra, J.1. A person accused of an offence, which involves life imprisonment or jeoparding his personal liberty, has a fundamental right of free legal assistance at State expense. This fundamental right is implicit in the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 21 1999

Sri NaraIn and Another Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-21-1999

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 21, 23 and 24

Reported in : 1999VIAD(Delhi)295; 2000CriLJ965; 82(1999)DLT490; 1999(51)DRJ313; ILR1999Delhi444; 1999RLR572

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Pawan Behl,; Mr. Pandey,; OSD Welfare Department.,;

ORDERAnil Dev Singh, J.1. In the instant case in our order dated January 13, 1999 we noted that both the appellants, Shri Sri Narain and Smt. Savita, who are husband and wife, were in custody on...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 07 2008

Vysya Leasing and Finance Ltd. Vs. Amrit Lal Bajaj and Co. and anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-07-2008

Subject : Civil

Acts : Negotiable Instrument Act - Sections 138, 141 and 142; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 37, Rule 3

Reported in : 146(2008)DLT741

Advocate for Appellant : Aman Vachher and; Ashutosh Dubey, Advs

ORDERShiv Narayan Dhingra, J.1. By this common order I shall dispose of above three applications for leave to defend since all the three applications under Order 37 Rule 3 CPC are based on similar facts and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 27 2008

Moneygrowth Investment and Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of India

Court : SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Decided on : Aug-27-2008

Subject : MRTP

1. This case is yet another instance where the show cause notice does not disclose any cause of action much less the violation of the provisions alleged to have been violated by the appellant. This apart,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial