Advanced Search Results

Rinl Vs. the Commissioner of Central

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Subject : Service Tax

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Paresh M. Dave

1. This appeal arises from OIO 10/05-06 dated 10.8.05 by which the Commissioner of Central Excise has directed the assessee to reverse credit of Rs. 4,45,61,623/-. He has imposed a penalty of Rs. 25 lakhs in...

Panchmahal District Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Subject : Excise

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Paresh M. Dave

2. Applicant is absent and unrepresented. A fax has been received from Mr. Paresh M. Dave, counsel for the applicant seeking adjournment that his flight (presumably from Ahmedabad) was delayed and he would not be able...

Raajratna Metal Industries Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ...

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Excise

Reported in : 2004(112)LC752(Gujarat)

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Paresh M. Dave, Mr. Trivedi

ORDERM.S. Shah, J.1. Mr. Kamal Trivedi, learned Additional Advocate General with Mr. Paresh M. Dave, learned Counsel for the petitioners seeks leave to delete prayer (A) and also the first part of prayer (D).Leave as prayed...

Mahendra Petrochemicals Ltd. Vs. Union of India (UOi) thro' Secretary

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 2(34), 127A, 127B, 127B(1) and 127B(1)(B); Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992 - Sections 5 and 7 to 9; Customs Act, 1961; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 31 and 32, 32E(1)

Reported in : 2004(93)ECC526; 2004(165)ELT499(Guj); (2004)2GLR1306

Advocate for Appellant : Paresh M. Dave, Adv. for Petitioner Nos. 1-2

M.S. Shah, J.1. Rule. Mr DN Patel, learned Senior Standing Counsel for the Union of India waives service of Rule for the respondents.2. In this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, the petitioners have challenged...

Shyam Textile Mills Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India

Reported in : 2005(100)ECC524

Advocate for Appellant : Paresh M. Dave, Adv. for Petitioner No. 1-2

M.S. Shah, J.1. Rule. Ms D.N Raval, learned Senior Standing Counsel for the Central Government waives service of Rule for the respondents.In the facts and circumstances of the case, the petition is taken up for final...

Ralli Engine Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Excise

Reported in : 2004(95)ECC415

Advocate for Appellant : M. Dave, Adv.

ORDER1. Rule.Heard the learned counsel for the parties on the question of interim relief.2. The petition contains challenge to the discriminatory treatment being given by the Commissionerates in three different States, i.e., Gujarat, Maharashtra and Tamil...

Texplast Engineers Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Gujarat

Subject : ExciseSICA

Acts : Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 - Sections 22(1); ;Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2005(182)ELT150(Guj)

Advocate for Appellant : Paresh M. Dave, Adv.

M.S. Shah, J. 1. Rule. Ms. Dharmishta Raval, learned senior standing Counsel for the Central Government waives service of Rule for the respondents.2. What is challenged in this petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution is...

Khanbhai Esoofbhai Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Excise

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2005(186)ELT404(Guj)

Advocate for Appellant : Paresh M. Dave, Adv.

M.S. Shah, J.1. Rule. Ms. Dharmishta Raval, learned senior standing counsel for the Central Government waives service of Rule for the respondents.In the facts and circumstances of the case, the petition is taken up for final...

Kediya Cera Tiles Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Gujarat

Subject : ExciseConstitution

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 35B(1); Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2005(182)ELT161(Guj)

Advocate for Appellant : Paresh M. Dave, Adv.

M.S. Shah, J.1. Rule. Ms Dharmishta Raval, learned senior standing counsel for the Central Government waives service of Rule on behalf of the respondents.In the facts and circumstances, the petition is taken up for final disposal...

D.R. Industries Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and 3 ors.

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 11AB, 11AC, 35, 35(1), 35B(1), 35B(5), 35A(4A) and 35E(3); Excise Act, 1980; Finance Act, 1980; Finance Act, 2001; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 4 to 24 and 29(2); Finance Act, 2007; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 173Q(1); Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal (Procedure) Rules, 1989 - Rule 17 and 17(2); Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226

Reported in : 2008(127)ECC61; 2008(153)LC61(Gujarat); 2008(229)ELT24(Guj)

Advocate for Appellant : Paresh M. Dave, Adv. in Special Civil Application Nos. 4973 and 11860 of 2006 and; P.J. Kanabar, Adv.

M.S. Shah, J.1. All these petitions challenge the constitutional validity of the proviso to Sub-section (1) of Section 35 of the Central Excise Act, 1944 ('the Act' for short) in so far as it provides that...