Advanced Search Results
The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Smt. Swaran Khanna and ors.
Delhi
Sep-29-2011
Motor Vehicles
Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 110A, 92A
Mr. Pankaj Seth, Adv.
1. The short question which arises for decision in the present appeal is whether the liability of the appellant-Insurance Company was limited to the extent of ` 50,000/- only or it was unlimited third party liability...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSaroj Devi and anr. Vs. Pawan Kumar and ors.
Delhi
Sep-13-2011
Motor Vehicles
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Section 166
Mr. Ashok Popli, Adv.
1. The appellants in this appeal seek to assail the judgment and award of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Shahdara, Delhi dated 02.02.1999 whereby a sum of ` 1,93,840/- was awarded to the appellants with interest...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPramila Sachdeva Vs. Kuldip Singh and ors.
Delhi
May-06-2011
Land Acquisition
Mr. Navneet Goyal, Adv.
1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and award dated 12th August, 1999 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarding a sum of Rs.5,12,000/- alongwith interest thereon. 2. The claim petition which resulted in...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Kundan Singh and ors.
Delhi
Jan-24-2011
Land Acquisition
Mr. Pankaj Seth, Adv.
1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?2. To be referred to the Reporter or not?3. Whether judgment should be reported in Digest?J U D G M E N T (ORAL)1.By...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNew India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Zarina and Others
Delhi
Sep-29-2011
Motor Vehicles
Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 110A, 92A
Mr. Pankaj Seth, Adv.
1. The appellant, the New India Assurance Co. Ltd., seeks to assail the judgment and award of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal dated 10.02.2003, whereby a sum of ` 1,80,000/- with interest at the rate of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMs. Saroj Babasaheb Bhosle-naik Vs. Pal Peugeot Ltd., Dist. Thane and ...
Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Mumbai
Nov-30-2009
MRTP
Mr. Pankaj Deokar-Advocate for the complainant.
Oral Order:- Per Justice Mr. S.B. Mhase, Honble President: Heard Mr.Pankaj Deokar-Advocate for the complainant. Complainant has booked on 26/10/1995 car with O.P. no.2. O.P.no.1 is the manufacturer of the said car. O.P.no.2 is the dealer....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDr.(Smt.) Tej Sharma Vs. State
Rajasthan Jodhpur
Aug-25-2015
Land Acquisition
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR ORDER1 S.B.CR. MISC. PETITION No.1604/2012 DR.(SMT.) TEJ SHARMA VS. STATE OF RAJASTHAN2 S.B.CR. MISC. PETITION No.1507/2010 INDERJEET SINGH & ANR. VS. STATE OF RAJASTHAN &...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDr.Arun Kumar and Anr Vs. State and Anr
Rajasthan Jodhpur
Aug-25-2015
Land Acquisition
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR ORDER1 S.B.CR. MISC. PETITION No.1604/2012 DR.(SMT.) TEJ SHARMA VS. STATE OF RAJASTHAN2 S.B.CR. MISC. PETITION No.1507/2010 INDERJEET SINGH & ANR. VS. STATE OF RAJASTHAN &...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDr.Sushil Kumar Aaseri Vs. State
Rajasthan Jodhpur
Aug-25-2015
Land Acquisition
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR ORDER1 S.B.CR. MISC. PETITION No.1604/2012 DR.(SMT.) TEJ SHARMA VS. STATE OF RAJASTHAN2 S.B.CR. MISC. PETITION No.1507/2010 INDERJEET SINGH & ANR. VS. STATE OF RAJASTHAN &...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskInderjeet Singh and Anr Vs. State and Anr
Rajasthan Jodhpur
Aug-25-2015
Land Acquisition
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR ORDER1 S.B.CR. MISC. PETITION No.1604/2012 DR.(SMT.) TEJ SHARMA VS. STATE OF RAJASTHAN2 S.B.CR. MISC. PETITION No.1507/2010 INDERJEET SINGH & ANR. VS. STATE OF RAJASTHAN &...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »