Advanced Search Results

M/S.Sumangala Steels Limited, and ors. Vs. Government of the Union Ter ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution Of India - Article 226

Advocate for Appellant : Mr.P.S.Raman,Sr.Counsel; Mr.D.Sreenivasan, Advs.

1. Aggrieved by the order of the learned single Judge in W.P.No.15702 of 1997 dated 5.1.2001 in allowing the Writ Petition holding that the Writ Petitioner M/s.Sumangala Steels Limited is entitled to the benefits of subsidy...

Vijayakant. Vs. Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly

Court : Chennai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly Rules - Rule 121, 226, 219 to 230, 117, 120, 122, 121 (2), 121(1), 229 (d), 227(1); Constitution of India - Articles 226, 212 (1), 194(3), 105(3) , 20, 21

Advocate for Appellant : Mr.P.S.Raman, S.C. Adv.

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a writ of Declaration declaring the impugned resolution dated 02.02.2012 passed in the Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly, which was communicated to the petitioner in the...

The Financial Times Ltd. Vs.the Times Publishing House Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. P.S. Raman, Mr. Aparajitha Vishwanath, Mr. Gaurav Mukherjee, Mr. J.V. Abhay, Mr. Raghav Pant, Mr. Avijit Deb, Ms. Ashima Obhan, Mr. Hemant Singh, Mr. K. Datta, Mr. Shashi P. Ojha, Mr. Rahul Malhotra

% + *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:7. h October, 2016 W.P.(C) No.2735/2012 + + THE FINANCIAL TIMES LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. P.S. Raman, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Aparajitha...

Sumangala Steels Ltd. Vs. Government of the Union Territory of Pondich ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Sales Tax

Reported in : (2001)1MLJ265

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. P.S. Raman

ORDERK. Sampath, J.1. The prayer is for a mandamus to the respondents to sanction all the benefits conferred on new industries in backward areas brought into effect by the Government of Pondicherry, vide letter No. 16(23)/82-SSI(II)/SSI(P),...

C.S.S. Corp Private Limited Vs. Space Matrix Design Consultants

Court : Chennai

Subject : Arbitration and Conciliation

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act - Section 9; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 38, Rule 5

Advocate for Appellant : Mr.P.S.Raman, Adv.

This appeal arises out of the order in A.No.2661 of 2011 [19.09.2011] directing the Appellant to furnish security for a sum of Rs.4,56,22,368/-. 2. Respondent is a Private Limited Company engaged in the business of providing...

The Financial Times Ltd. Vs.times Publishing House Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. P.S. Raman, Mr. Aparajitha Vishwanath, Mr. Gaurav Mukherjee, Mr. J.V. Abhay, Mr. Raghav Pant, Mr. Avijit Deb, Ms. Ashima Obhan

% + *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:7. h October, 2016 W.P.(C) No.2737/2012 THE FINANCIAL TIMES LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. P.S. Raman, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Aparajitha Vishwanath, Mr....

R. Padma and ors. Vs. the Appropriate Authority, Income Tax Department ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (1989)2MLJ63

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. P.S. Raman

Sathiadev, J.1. Respondents 5 to 7 in W.P.No.4536 of 1988 are the appellants herein. Respondents 1 to 3 therein are respondents 1 to 3 herein, and the writ petitioner is impleaded as fourth respondent.2. In the...

Aloys Wobben Argestrasse.Vs. Enercon (India) Limited, and anr.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr.P.S.Raman, Adv.

1. The prayer in the writ petition is for issuance of writ of Certiorari to quash the orders passed by the Intellectual Property Appellate Board, (hereinafter referred to "as the Tribunal") the second respondent herein, in...

AmrithaA. Vs. V.Krishna Kumar.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Family Courts

Acts : Family Courts Act - Section 19

Advocate for Appellant : Mr.P.S.Raman,Sr.Counsel, Adv.

1.This Appeal arises out of the judgment in F.C.O.P.No.2359 of 2004 on the file of Principal Family Court, Chennai dismissing the Petition filed by the Appellant/wife under Section 13(1)(ia) and (ib) of the Hindu Marriage Act...

Consim Info Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Google India Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Intellectual Property

Advocate for Appellant : Mr.P.S.Raman, Adv.

"What's in a name That which we call a rose, By any other name would smell as sweet"1. would have been acceptable to Shakespeare, but certainly not to WIPO. Today everything is in a name, if...