Advanced Search Results

Pradip Kumar Das Vs. State of Tripura and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Civil

Acts : Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1956 - Rules 11, 14, 14 (1) and (3) to (23); Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1965 - Rule 16(1); Constitution of India - Article 226

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. P. Roy Barman, Ms. M. Deb Roy and Mr. B. Saha, Advs.

1. Heard Mr. P. Roy Barman, learned counsel for petitioner. Also heard Mr. U.B. Saha, learned senior Govt. Advocate, assisted by Mr. J. Majumdar, learned counsel the respondents.2. By this writ petition under Article 226 of...

Pradip Kumar Das Vs. State of Tripura and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Civil

Acts : Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1956 - Rules 11, 14, 14 (1) and (3) to (23);; Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1965 - Rule 16(1);; Constitution of India - Article 226

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. P. Roy Barman, ;Ms. M. Deb Roy and ;Mr. B. Saha, Advs.

ORDER1. Heard Mr. P. Roy Barman, learned counsel for petitioner. Also heard Mr. U.B. Saha, learned senior Govt. Advocate, assisted by Mr. J. Majumdar, learned counsel the respondents.2. By this writ petition under Article 226 of...

Ankush Jain vs.pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-4

Court : Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Rakesh Tikku, Mr. P. Roy Choudhary, Mr. Lokesh Bhardwaj, Ms. Jyotsna Mehta, Mr. Sushil Kumar Gupta, Ms. Maninder Acharya, Mr. Zoheb Hossain

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:1. t August, 2019 Decided on:21. t August, 2019 + ANKUSH JAIN W.P. (C) 6541/2017 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Rakesh Tikku, Senior Advocate with...

Vaibhav Jain vs.pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-4

Court : Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Rakesh Tikku, Mr. P. Roy Choudhary, Mr. Lokesh Bhardwaj, Ms. Jyotsna Mehta, Mr. Sushil Kumar Gupta, Ms. Maninder Acharya, Mr. Zoheb Hossain

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:1. t August, 2019 Decided on:21. t August, 2019 + ANKUSH JAIN W.P. (C) 6541/2017 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Rakesh Tikku, Senior Advocate with...

Dinanath Brahma Vs. Baleswar Shah and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Civil

Acts : Assam Land and Revenue Regulation, 1986 - Regulation 162(2)

Advocate for Appellant : P. Roy, Adv.

P. P. Naolekar, C.J.1. Heard Mr. P. Roy, learned counsel for the appellant. None appears for the respondents.2. The facts in brief necessary for adjudication of the question involved in a case are set out herein...

Dalim Das, Assam and Another Vs. The State of Assam, Represented by th ...

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. R. Kalita

(Oral). 1. This writ petition is directed against the Annexure-10, preliminary enquiry report dated 28.03.2014; Annexure-13 communication dated 23.07.2014 of the Government of Assam in the Political (Vigilance Cell) Department conveying the approval to initiate a...

Chandan Malakar Vs. Assam State Electricity Board and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Service

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. P. Roy

B.K. Sharma, J.1. The petitioner presently working as a Junior Engineer under the official respondents, has filed this writ petition for a direction to the respondents to promote him as Assistant Engineer. He has also prayed...

Sharma S.D. Vs. Ramesh Mahakud and anr.

Court : Orissa

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 - Sections 4A; Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 95 and 95(2); Orissa Motor Vehicles Rules, 1940 - Rule 95

Reported in : 1993ACJ385; (1999)IIILLJ418Ori

Advocate for Appellant : Pradip Mohanty and ;B.P. Ray, Advs.

S.C. Mohapatra, J. 1. These three appeals by the employer under Section 30 of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') arise out of the same accident. All the three appeals having...

State of West Bengal Vs. A. Mondal

Court : Kolkata

Subject : ArbitrationLimitation

Acts : Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Article 119; ;Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 8, 13 and 14(2)

Reported in : AIR1985Cal12,89CWN82

Advocate for Appellant : A.P. Chatterjee and ;Prabir Roy Chowdhury, Advs.

M.M. Dutt, J. 1. This appeal has been preferred by the appellant, the State of West Bengal, against the judgment and order D/- March 1, 1984 of a learned single Judge of this Court dismissing the...

Dulal Ch. Baidya Vs. State of Tripura

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 2009CriLJ2365

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. P. Sarkar

U.B. Saha, J.1. Both the appeals arise out of the common judgment and order dated 27-5-2005 passed by the learned Special Judge, South Tripura, Udaipur in Case No. Special 2 of 2007 whereby and where-under the...