Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: mr p n bhan · Page 1 of about 5 results (0.046 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 25 2011

Rashid Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-25-2011

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 302, 120B, 34; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 428, 313; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 25, 27

Advocate for Appellant : Mr P. N. Bhan, Adv.

1. These appeals are directed against the common judgment passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Delhi in Sessions Case No. 67/2009 on 25.09.2009. The case arose out of FIR No. 368/2005 registered under Sections 302/120B/34...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 21 2013

D.K.Chakraborty Vs. S.P.Roy Chaudhary and anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-21-2013

Subject : Criminal

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on : January 16, 2013 Pronounced on : January 21, 2013 + CRL.REV.P. 55/2007 D.K.CHAKRABORTY Through: ..... Petitioner Mr.P.N.Bhan, Advocate versus S.P.ROY CHAUDHARY & ANR....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 21 2000

Kaushik Chakraborty Vs. Director General Doordarshan and Another

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-21-2000

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Constitution of India Article 226

Reported in : 86(2000)DLT660; 2000(54)DRJ854

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. P. N. Bhan, Adv

ORDERManmohan Sarin, J.1. Rule. With the consent of the parties the writ petition is taken up for disposal as the pleadings are complete. Petitioner by this writ petition seeks the quashing of the sanction letter bearing...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 10 2010

Mohd. Jalil Alias Kala Vs State

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-10-2010

Subject : Criminal

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. P.K. Srivastava , Mr. P.N. Bhan, Advs.

1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? Yes3. Whether the judgment should be reported in Digest? Yes ORDER.1. This appeal is...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 10 2010

Mohd. Rizwan Vs State

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-10-2010

Subject : Criminal

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. P.K. Srivastava , Mr. P.N. Bhan, Advs.

1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? Yes3. Whether the judgment should be reported in Digest? Yes 1. This appeal is...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial