Advanced Search Results

Prabhunath Tiwari and ors. Vs. Ranchi Regional Development Authority a ...

Court : Jharkhand Ranchi

Subject : Service

Acts : Jharkhand Regional Development Authority Act 38 , 37.

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. P.K.Prasad; M/s. S.N.Prasad; Abhishek, Advs.

1. A suit being Title Suit No. 266/2006 was instituted by the petitioners interalia against defendantrespondent no. 4 Md. Anwar, who appeared in the suit. Thereafter, he filed an application for sanction of map, which was...

Jai Krishna Prasad Vs. Coal India Ltd. and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Service

Acts : Service Law; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : [2003(3)JCR457(Jhr)]

Advocate for Appellant : P.K. Prasad,; Sumir Prasad and; T.N. Verma, Advs.

Tapen Sen, J.1. Heard Mr. P.K. Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. M.M. Bannerjea, assisted by Mr. Indrajit Sinha, learned counsel for the respondents.2. The writ petitioner in the instant case has prayed for...

Prem Chandra Garg Vs. Coal India Ltd. and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Service

Acts : Service Law; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : [2003(3)JCR458(Jhr)]

Advocate for Appellant : P.K. Prasad,; Sumir Prasad and; T.N. Verma, Advs.

Tapen Sen, J.1. Heard Mr. P.K. Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. M.M. Bannerjea, assisted by Mr. Indrajit Sinha, learned counsel for the respondents.2. Mr. P.K. Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioner states that...

Pravaskumarsingh and ors. Vs. the State of Jharkhand and ors

Court : Jharkhand Ranchi

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Jharkhand Superior Judicial Service (Recruitment, Appointment and Conditions of Service) Rules - Rules 25; Constitution of India - Rules 14, 16(1).

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Indrajit Sinha, Adv.

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. The learned counsel for the petitioners in this petition has challenged the appointment of Fast Track Judges in the State of Jharkhand. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted...

Pravaskumarsinghandother. Vs. thestateofjharkh and ors

Court : Jharkhand Ranchi

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Jharkhand Superior Judicial Service (Recruitment, Appointment and Conditions of Service) Rules - Rules 25, 14, 16(1); Constitution of India - 14, 16(1),

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Indrajit Sinha.

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. The learned counsel for the petitioners in this petition has challenged the appointment of Fast Track Judges in the State of Jharkhand. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted...

Pravas Kumar Singh and ors. Vs

Court : Jharkhand Ranchi

Subject : Service

Acts : Jharkhand Superior Judicial Service (Recruitment, Appointment and Conditions of Service) Rules 319, 5, 25; Constitution of India - 14 and 16(1).

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Indrajit Sinha, Adv.

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. The learned counsel for the petitioners in this petition has challenged the appointment of Fast Track Judges in the State of Jharkhand. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted...

Ashok Kumar Saw Vs. Smt. Yashomati Devi

Court : Patna

Subject : Tenancy

M.Y. Eqbal, J.1. This Civil Revision application is directed against the order dated 15.12.1997 passed by the Munsif, Khunti, in Eviction Title Suit No. 5 of 1995, whereby the application filed by the defendant-petitioner under Order...

Nandji Upadhaya Vs. Bihar State Mineral Development Corporation Ltd. a ...

Court : Patna

Subject : Service

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. P.K. Prasad

R.N. Sahay, J.1. The main grievance of the petitioner is that he was entitled to be designated as Chemist w.e.f. 8.2.1985 and that Respondent Nos. 5 and 6 were illegally designated as Chemist by superseding the...

Badri Prasad Mistry Vs. Coal India Ltd. and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Service

Acts : Service Law; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : [2003(3)JCR433(Jhr)]

Advocate for Appellant : P.K. Prasad, Adv.

Tapen Sen, J.1. In this writ application, the petitioner prays for quashing the order/letter dated 2.2.1996 as contained in Annexure 16, whereby and whereunder his representation in relation to his claim for seniority over the respondent...

Ranchi Kshetriya GramIn Bank and ors. Vs. D.P. Singh and ors.

Court : Patna

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Regional Rural Banks (Appointment and Promotion) Rules, 1988 - Rule 7; Regional Rural Banks Act, 1976 - Sections 17 and 29

Advocate for Appellant : P.R. Prasad and R.R. Nath, Advs.

M.Y. Eqbal, J.1. Whether in case of promotions on the basis of 'Seniority-cum-Merit', comparative merit of the candidates along with seniority have to be judged and whether allocation of less marks for seniority and more marks...