Advanced Search Results

Ratanlal Nahata Vs. Nandita Bose

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil of Procedure, 1908 - Sections 4(1), 100, 114, 122, 123, 126, 129, 141, 229 and 627 - Order 7, Rule 5 - Order 41, Rule 11 - Order 47, Rules 1, 5, 6 and 7;; Constitution of India, 1905 - Articles 215, 225, 226, 266, 269, 271, 372 and 374(2);; Government of India Act, 1915 - Sections 106(1), 108 and 108(2);; Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941; Original Side Ruels - Rules 2, 3, 34 and 36;; High Courts Act, 1861 - Sections 98(3), 106(1), 108(1), 624 and 627;; Government of India (Amendment) Act, 1935 - Sections 223 and 256;; Contempt of Courts Act, 1971;; Interpretation Act - Section 32;; Rajasthan High Courts Rules, 1952 - Rule 64;; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 25-F, 33, 33(2 and A);; Punjab Courts Act;; Bihar Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Contr

Reported in : (1998)3CALLT348(HC)

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. P.K. Das. ;Mr. P.K. Dutt, ;Mr. R. Bachawat, ;Mr. D. Ghosh, ;Mr. M.K. Singh, ;Mr. A.K. Panjam ;Mr. K.R.Das, ;Mr. Arijit Banerjee and ;Mr. Debdutta Dutta, Advs.

P.S. Mishra, C.J.1. I have the privilege to go through the separate but concurring judgments of S.K. Sen, J and S.B.Slnha, J.2. It is indisputable that procedural laws are meant to advance justice and the same...

Tapati Ghosh Vs. Sm. Parul Barick and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Property

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Section 11;; Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988 - Sections 1, 3, 4, 4(1, 2 and 3), 5 and 8;; Indian Succession Act, 1925

Reported in : (2000)2CALLT414(HC)

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. P.K. Das and ;Mr. Pradip Dutta, Advs.

The Court1. Originally a suit was instituted by one Saliabala Dassi being widow of one Kalipada Barick, since deceased on 21st July, 1965 as available from the original date of verification of the Plaint. 2. Said...

Mid East Port Folio Management Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2003)87ITD537(Mum.)

1. These two appeals were heard by the Special Bench as directed by the Hon'ble President, Tribunal. The events leading up to the reference may be briefly noticed.2. The appeal of the assessee M/s Mid East...

Puskar Raj Wason Vs. Union of India (Uoi) (S.E. Railway) and anr.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 15, 16, 16(1), 30 and 33

Reported in : AIR2008Cal255,2008(4)ARBLR567(Cal),2008(4)CHN477

Advocate for Appellant : P.K. Das, ;Bimal Kumar Singh and ;C. Nagchoudhury, Advs.

Pranab Kumar Chattopadhyay, J.1. The instant appeal has been preferred from the judgment and order dated 21st March, 2005 passed by a learned single Judge of this Hon'ble Court on the application filed by the appellant...

Lachit Bordoloi Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Criminal

Aftab H. Saikia, J.1. Heard Mr. B.K. Mahajan, Mr. A. Choudhury, Mr. R. Ali, Mr. P.K. Das and Mr. N.J. Das, learned Counsel representing the petitioner as well as Mr. P.S. Deka and R.K. Adhikary, learned...

Gopi Nath Sen and ors. Vs. Bahadurmul Dulichand and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : PropertyContract

Acts : Specific Relief Act, 1968 - Sections 21(2), 24 and 73; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 6, Rule 17

Reported in : AIR1979Cal203

Advocate for Appellant : P.K. Sen and ;Pinaki Ghose, Advs.

Ramendra Mohan Datta, J. 1. It is settled law that the plaintiff in a suit for specific performance must be ready and willing to perform his part of the contract not only up to the date...

University of Burdwan and anr. Vs. Dr. Prasanto Chatterjee

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 16

Reported in : (2008)1CALLT229(HC),2008(2)CHN773

Advocate for Appellant : Dipak Kumar Sengupta and ;Monish Sen, Advs.

Ashim Kumar Banerjee, J.1. Dr. Prasanto Chatterjee, the respondent No. 1 was a professor of history in Burdwan University. He retired on January 31, 1996. Prior to his superannuation he applied for re-employment for two years...

Lachit Bordoloi Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 2008(IV)GLT677

Aftab H. Saikia, J.1. Heard Mr. B.K. Mahajan, Mr. A. Choudhury, Mr. R. Ali, Mr. P.K. Das and Mr. N.J. Das, learned Counsel representing the petitioner as well as Mr. P.S. Deka and R.K. Adhikary, learned...

Chandan Kumar Alias Chandan Singh Vs. The State of Jharkhand

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Land Acquisition

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI A.B.A. No. 2754 of 2017 Dinkar Nath Sahdeo @ Dinkar Sahdeo @ Dinkar Shahdeo ..... Petitioner(s) Versus The State of Jharkhand & Anr. …. Opp. Party(s) CORAM: HON’BLE MR....

Cimmco Ltd. Vs. Texmaco Rail and Engineering Ltd.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Arbitration

AP No.673 of 2012 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction Original Side CIMMCO LTD.Versus TEXMACO RAIL & ENGINEERING LTD.Appearance Mr.Ratnanko Banerjee, Adv.Mr.S.K.Mal, Adv.Mr.Jayanta Mitra, Sr.Adv.Mr.Srenik Singvi, Adv.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE SANJIB BANERJEE...