Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: mr p h parekh · Page 1 of about 64 results (0.110 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

May 06 2009

Tamil Nadu Electricity Board Vs. Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd and A ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Decided on : May-06-2009

Subject : MRTP

Advocate for Appellant : Counsel for the Appellant(s): Mr. P.H. Parekh, Sr. Advocate, Mr. Sameer Parekh, Mr. E.R. Kumar, MR. Subhanshu Padhi, Mr. Akshat Jain, MS. Mehak Bhalla, Mr. Ashish Vaid, Advocates. Counsel for the Resp

Heard Mr. P.H. Parekh, the learned Senior Counsel appearing for the Appellant and Mr. R. Chandrachud, the learned Counsel appearing for the Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd.. Mr. P. H. Parekh, the learned Senior Counsel appearing for...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 20 2009

Tamil Nadu Electricity Board Vs. Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd. and ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Decided on : May-20-2009

Subject : MRTP

Advocate for Appellant : Counsel for the Appellant(s) : Mr. P.H. Parekh, Sr. Advocate, Mr. Sameer Parekh, Mr. E.R. Kumar, Mr. Subhanshu Padhi, Mr. Akshat Jain, Mr. Ashish Vaid, Advocates. Counsel for the Respondent (s): Mr. R

Heard the learned counsel for the parties. Several issues have been raised by Mr. P.H. Parekh, learned senior counsel assailing the order impugned. One of the points raised by Mr. Parekh is that one of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 23 2021

In Re Cognizance For Extension Of Limitation Vs. Xxxx

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-23-2021

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : ABHINAV RAMKRISHNA __

Corrected Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Miscellaneous Application No.665 of 2021 In SMW(C) No.3 of 2020 IN RE: COGNIZANCE FOR EXTENSION OF LIMITATION ORDER1 Due to the outbreak of COVID-19 pandemic...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

May 07 2012

Supreme Court Bar Association and ors. Vs. B.D. Kaushik.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-07-2012

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 39 Rules 1 and 2, Section 151 ; Companies Act, 1956 - Section 173(2)

Surinder Singh Nijjar|1. I.A. No.1 of 2012 has been filed by the Supreme Court Advocate-on- Record Association (SCAORA) in Civil Appeal Nos.3401 and 3402 of 2003, which were disposed of on 26th September, 2011, and form...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 25 2010

Md. ShahabuddIn Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-25-2010

Subject : ConstitutionCriminal

Acts : Bengal, Agra and Assam Civil Courts Act, 1887 - Sections 13, 13(1) and 14(1); Bihar Control of Crimes Act, 1981; Evidence Act - Sections 114I; West Bengal Special Courts Act, 1950; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 2, 9, 9(6), 11, 11(1), 177 to 185, 197, 309, 327, 327(1), 327(2), 352, 407, 407(1), 407(7), 408, 462 and 465; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 352; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16, 19(1), 21, 309, 310 and 311; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 376, 376(1), 376(2), 376A, 376B, 376C and 376D

Reported in : 2010(2)SCALE204; (2010)4SCC653

Advocate for Appellant : Ram Jethmalani, Sr. Adv.,; Pranay Ranajan,; Lata Krishnamurt

Dalveer Bhandari, J.1. Leave granted.2. This appeal is directed against the judgment of the High Court of Judicature at Patna passed in Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 553 of 2006 dated 14.08.2007.3. The appellant is aggrieved...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 17 2015

Rashmi Behl Vs. State of U.P and Ors

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-17-2015

Subject : Education

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (Crl.) No.218 OF2013Rashmi Behl .....Petitioner(s) versus State of Uttar Pradesh and others .....Respondent(s) JUDGMENT M.Y.Eqbal, J.Petitioner, a young girl of 22 years who hails...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 21 2006

Rajiv Ranjan Singh 'Lalan' and Anr. Vs. Union of India (UOi) and Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-21-2006

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 13(1) and 13(2); Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 109; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 173(8); Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21, 32, 226, 233 and 235; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 131, 131(1A), 131A, 139, 147, 148, 149(1), 260A and 273A; Evidence Act

Reported in : 2006(6)ALD103(SC); (2006)205CTR(SC)53; [2006(4)JCR89(SC)]; JT2006(8)SC328; 2006(8)SCALE161; (2006)6SCC613; 2007(12) SCC 687

Advocate for Appellant : Mukul Rohtagi and; Kailash Vasudev, Sr. Advs.,; Gopal Singh

K.G. Balakrishnan, J.1. These writ petitions are filed as Public Interest Litigation by the two petitioners herein who were Members of the Parliament at the time of filing the petitions. Respondent nos. 4 and 5 were...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 21 2006

Rajiv Ranjan Singhlalan and anr. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-21-2006

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2006)205CTR(SC)512; [2006]156TAXMAN512(SC)

Advocate for Appellant : Mukul Rohtagi, and; Kailash Vasudev,; Gopal Singh, ;

K.G. Balakrishnan, J.These writ petitions are filed as public interest litigation by the two petitioners herein who were Members of the Parliament at the time of filing the petitions. Respondent Nos. 4 and 5 were formerly...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 16 2002

Vineet Kumar Mathur Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-16-2002

Subject : Environment

Reported in : (2002)10SCC573

G.B. Pattanaik and; R.P. Sethi, JJ.1. In relation to the pollution of River Gomti, order has been passed by this Court on 7-11-2001† requiring the State of Uttar Pradesh to acquire necessary land in different cities...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 25 2013

Hamdard University Teacher???s Association and anr. Vs. Union of India ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-25-2013

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. P.H. Parekh, Mr. Mohd. Usman Siddiqui, Mr. M. Tarique Siddiqui, Ms. Aisha Siddiqui, Mr. Aditya Gaur, Mr. Vishal Prashad

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + WP(C) No.920/2012 % April 25, 2013 HAMDARD UNIVERSITY TEACHERS ASSOCIATION & ANR. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. P.H. Parekh, Senior Advocate with Mr. Mohd. Usman Siddiqui,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial