Advanced Search Results
Tamil Nadu Electricity Board Vs. Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd and A ...
Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL
May-06-2009
MRTP
Counsel for the Appellant(s): Mr. P.H. Parekh, Sr. Advocate, Mr. Sameer Parekh, Mr. E.R. Kumar, MR. Subhanshu Padhi, Mr. Akshat Jain, MS. Mehak Bhalla, Mr. Ashish Vaid, Advocates. Counsel for the Resp
Heard Mr. P.H. Parekh, the learned Senior Counsel appearing for the Appellant and Mr. R. Chandrachud, the learned Counsel appearing for the Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd.. Mr. P. H. Parekh, the learned Senior Counsel appearing for...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskTamil Nadu Electricity Board Vs. Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd. and ...
Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL
May-20-2009
MRTP
Counsel for the Appellant(s) : Mr. P.H. Parekh, Sr. Advocate, Mr. Sameer Parekh, Mr. E.R. Kumar, Mr. Subhanshu Padhi, Mr. Akshat Jain, Mr. Ashish Vaid, Advocates. Counsel for the Respondent (s): Mr. R
Heard the learned counsel for the parties. Several issues have been raised by Mr. P.H. Parekh, learned senior counsel assailing the order impugned. One of the points raised by Mr. Parekh is that one of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re Cognizance For Extension Of Limitation Vs. Xxxx
Supreme Court of India
Sep-23-2021
Land Acquisition
ABHINAV RAMKRISHNA __
Corrected Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Miscellaneous Application No.665 of 2021 In SMW(C) No.3 of 2020 IN RE: COGNIZANCE FOR EXTENSION OF LIMITATION ORDER1 Due to the outbreak of COVID-19 pandemic...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Supreme Court Bar Association and ors. Vs. B.D. Kaushik.
Supreme Court of India
May-07-2012
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 39 Rules 1 and 2, Section 151 ; Companies Act, 1956 - Section 173(2)
Surinder Singh Nijjar|1. I.A. No.1 of 2012 has been filed by the Supreme Court Advocate-on- Record Association (SCAORA) in Civil Appeal Nos.3401 and 3402 of 2003, which were disposed of on 26th September, 2011, and form...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMd. ShahabuddIn Vs. State of Bihar and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Mar-25-2010
ConstitutionCriminal
Bengal, Agra and Assam Civil Courts Act, 1887 - Sections 13, 13(1) and 14(1); Bihar Control of Crimes Act, 1981; Evidence Act - Sections 114I; West Bengal Special Courts Act, 1950; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 2, 9, 9(6), 11, 11(1), 177 to 185, 197, 309, 327, 327(1), 327(2), 352, 407, 407(1), 407(7), 408, 462 and 465; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 352; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16, 19(1), 21, 309, 310 and 311; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 376, 376(1), 376(2), 376A, 376B, 376C and 376D
2010(2)SCALE204; (2010)4SCC653
Ram Jethmalani, Sr. Adv.,; Pranay Ranajan,; Lata Krishnamurt
Dalveer Bhandari, J.1. Leave granted.2. This appeal is directed against the judgment of the High Court of Judicature at Patna passed in Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 553 of 2006 dated 14.08.2007.3. The appellant is aggrieved...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRashmi Behl Vs. State of U.P and Ors
Supreme Court of India
Feb-17-2015
Education
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (Crl.) No.218 OF2013Rashmi Behl .....Petitioner(s) versus State of Uttar Pradesh and others .....Respondent(s) JUDGMENT M.Y.Eqbal, J.Petitioner, a young girl of 22 years who hails...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRajiv Ranjan Singh 'Lalan' and Anr. Vs. Union of India (UOi) and Ors.
Supreme Court of India
Aug-21-2006
Criminal
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 13(1) and 13(2); Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 109; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 173(8); Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21, 32, 226, 233 and 235; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 131, 131(1A), 131A, 139, 147, 148, 149(1), 260A and 273A; Evidence Act
2006(6)ALD103(SC); (2006)205CTR(SC)53; [2006(4)JCR89(SC)]; JT2006(8)SC328; 2006(8)SCALE161; (2006)6SCC613; 2007(12) SCC 687
Mukul Rohtagi and; Kailash Vasudev, Sr. Advs.,; Gopal Singh
K.G. Balakrishnan, J.1. These writ petitions are filed as Public Interest Litigation by the two petitioners herein who were Members of the Parliament at the time of filing the petitions. Respondent nos. 4 and 5 were...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRajiv Ranjan Singhlalan and anr. Vs. Union of India and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Aug-21-2006
Direct Taxation
(2006)205CTR(SC)512; [2006]156TAXMAN512(SC)
Mukul Rohtagi, and; Kailash Vasudev,; Gopal Singh, ;
K.G. Balakrishnan, J.These writ petitions are filed as public interest litigation by the two petitioners herein who were Members of the Parliament at the time of filing the petitions. Respondent Nos. 4 and 5 were formerly...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVineet Kumar Mathur Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Jan-16-2002
Environment
(2002)10SCC573
G.B. Pattanaik and; R.P. Sethi, JJ.1. In relation to the pollution of River Gomti, order has been passed by this Court on 7-11-2001† requiring the State of Uttar Pradesh to acquire necessary land in different cities...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHamdard University Teacher???s Association and anr. Vs. Union of India ...
Delhi
Apr-25-2013
Education
Mr. P.H. Parekh, Mr. Mohd. Usman Siddiqui, Mr. M. Tarique Siddiqui, Ms. Aisha Siddiqui, Mr. Aditya Gaur, Mr. Vishal Prashad
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + WP(C) No.920/2012 % April 25, 2013 HAMDARD UNIVERSITY TEACHERS ASSOCIATION & ANR. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. P.H. Parekh, Senior Advocate with Mr. Mohd. Usman Siddiqui,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- Next ›
- Last »