Advanced Search Results

Central Group and ors. Vs. Shri Narayan Gangaram Patil Through United ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2 and 33C(2); Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labor Practices Act, 1971 - Sections 28

Reported in : 2008(6)ALLMR788; 2008(6)BomCR567; (2008)110BOMLR3354; [2008(119)FLR911]; (2009)ILLJ851Bom

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Oak

B.H. Marlapalle, J.1. This intra court appeal is directed against the order passed by the learned Single Judge on 9/6/2004 thereby rejecting Writ Petition No. 1041 of 2004. The writ petition was filed under Article 226...

Kayyumkhan @ Shankar S/O Yusuf Khan and Others Vs. the State of Mahara ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3 and 59; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 392 & 397; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 313 and 377

Reported in : 1998BomCR(Cri)41; 1997CriLJ3137

Advocate for Appellant : S.M. Oak, holding, for ;R.B. Sule, ;Mr. M.Z. Shaikh, ;V.G. Sawant and ;M.B. Girkar, Advs.

ORDERVishnu Sahai, J.1. Vide Judgment and order dated 1-10-1984, passed in Sessions Case No. 587 of 1983, the Additional Sessions Judge, Gr. Bombay, convicted and sentenced Kayyumkhan @ Shankar s/o Yusuf Khan and Salim @ Munna...

Kumudini Damodar Magar and ors. Vs. Bhushan Damodar Magar and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 18, Rules 3A and 16

Reported in : AIR2004Bom397; 2004(4)ALLMR782; 2004(3)MhLj214

Advocate for Appellant : S.M. Oak, Adv., i/b., ;Ambar Joshi, Adv.

V.C. Daga, J.1. Rule returnable forthwith.By consent of parties petition is heard finally.2. This petition is directed against the order passed by the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Alibag below Exh. 62 in Special Civil Suit No....

Shri Purushottam Mishrilal Bhutara and ors. Vs. Jugalkishore R. Kothar ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 190, 205 and 249; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 36, 403, 406 and 420

Reported in : (2001)1BOMLR126

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. S. M. Oak, Adv.

Dr. Pratibha Upasani, J.1. These three Criminal Writ Petitions involve a common question of law, and can be therefore disposed of by this common Judgment and order.2. The Petitioners in all these three Petitions are the...

Arumugam Chelliah Paul (Since Deceased by Lrs.) and Others Vs. Life In ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Insurance

Acts : Insurance Act, 1938 - Sections 38, 39(5) and 45; Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 213 and 214; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 22, Rule 3; Constitution of India - Articles 12 and 226

Reported in : 1990ACJ949; AIR1990Bom255; 1990(1)BomCR237; (1989)91BOMLR544; [1991]70CompCas567(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : V.C. Kotwal and;S.P. Oak, Advs.

1. Arumugam Chelliah Paul, the original plaintiff, took a Life Insurance Policy on February 21, 1955, with the then existing National Insurance Company Limited, having its office at Calcutta..At that time the plaintiff was having a...

Malini Ganesh Tarlekar and ors. Vs. Hansraj Madhaorao Patil and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Poona University Act, 1974 - Sections 2, 2(23), 2(30), 2(31), 3, 6, 20, 20(3), 20(4), 20(5), 22(1), 23(1), 24(1), 25(1), 26(2), 29(2), 29(3), 29(4), 40(1), 47, 51, 59, 59(2), 86 and 91; Industrial Disputes Act; Industrial Relations Act; The Minimum Wages Act; Workmen's Compensation Act; Employees Provident Funds Act; Employees State Insurance Act; Bombay Labour Welfare Act; Indian Maternity Benefit Act; Madhya Pradesh Local Authorities School Teachers (Absorption in Government Service) Act, 1963

Reported in : AIR1979Bom230

Advocate for Appellant : C.R. Dalvi and ;K.Y. Mandlik, Advs.

Deshmukh. J.1. This is a petition by 8 academicians addressed against respondent No. 1 principally for a writ of quo warranto. According to them, respondent No. 1 ceases to be a teacher in the Poona University...

Pandurang Narayan Salunke Vs. Sindhu and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Widows' Re-marriage Act, 1856 - Sections 2, 3(1), 3(2), 3(3), 4(1), 5, 14(1), 15 and 15(1); The Hindu Womens' Rights to Property Act, 1937; Hindu Law

Reported in : AIR1971Bom413; (1971)73BOMLR402; 1971MhLJ615

Advocate for Appellant : V.N. Gadgil, Adv.

Chandrachud, J. 1. Two important questions arise in this appeal : (1) Whether Section 2 of the Hindu Widows' Re-marriage Act, 1856 (Act XV of 1856) hereinafter called 'the Act of 1856' is restricted in its...

Adusumilli Suryanarayana Vs. Achuta Pethanna

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Property

Reported in : (1919)21BOMLR547

John Edge, J.1. This is a consolidated appeal from three decrees, dated the 9th October, 1913, of the High Court at Madras, which affirmed decrees dated the 4th March, 1912, of the District Judge of Kistna,...

Ganesh Ramachandra Naik Vs. Sitaram Bhoir and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Election

Acts : Representation of People Act, 1951 - Sections 81, 82, 86(4) and 87; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 1, Rule 10

Reported in : AIR2000Bom294; 2000(3)ALLMR189; 2000(4)BomCR250; (2000)2BOMLR86; 2001(2)MhLj735

Advocate for Appellant : A.S. Oak, Adv. i/by ;Puranik & Co.

ORDERR.M. Lodha, J.1. This order shall dispose of the chamber summons taken out by respondent Nos. 10, 11 and 12 in the Election petition for deletion of their names from the election petition.2. Dr. Chandrachud, the...

Somsingh Chandrasingh Thakur Vs. Head Master, CaptaIn R.M. Oak School ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service

Acts : Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Condition of Service) Act, 1977 - Sections 9; Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Act, 1976; Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Condition of Service) Rules, 1981 - Rules 3, 3(3) and 9(10); Bombay Land Revenue Code

Reported in : 2005(4)ALLMR610; 2006(2)BomCR673; 2005(4)MhLj946

Advocate for Appellant : V.A. Thorat, Sr. Adv. and ;Surel S. Shah, Adv.

H.L. Gokhale, J.1. This Letters Patent Appeal seeks to challenge the order passed by a Single Judge on 9th February 2004 dismissing the writ petition filed by the Appellant herein to challenge the decision and order...