Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: mr narasimhachar · Page 1 of about 9 results (0.026 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Oct 16 1939

Akki Dodda Basappa Vs. Akki Mallamma and anr.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Oct-16-1939

Subject : FamilyProperty

Reported in : AIR1940Mad458; (1940)1MLJ204

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Narasimhachar

Venkataramana Rao, J.1. This is an appeal from the decree of the learned District Judge of Bellary dismissing the plaintiff's suit for a declaration that the decree passed in O.S. No. 3 of 1928 on the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 16 1940

Umade Rajaha Raje Damara Kumara Venkatalingama Nayanim Bahadur Varu, R ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-16-1940

Subject : Property

Reported in : (1942)2MLJ47

Abdur Rahman, J.1. This appeal arises out or a suit instituted by the present Raja of Kalahasti (Venkatalingamma by name) on the basis of a mortgage deed executed by his father the late Rajah of Kalahasti...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 26 1938

Muthyala Ramachandrappa Vs. Muthyala Narayanappa and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-26-1938

Subject : Family

Reported in : AIR1940Mad339

1. Appeal No. 189 of 1937. - This appeal arises out of a suit for partition between two brothers. The plaintiff is the second son of one Nagappa and defendant 1 is the elder son. Defendants...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 23 2026

Sri Chikkanna vs Mr Narasimhachar

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Feb-23-2026

-1-IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURUDATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE P SREE SUDHA MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 499 OF 2024 (MV-I) BETWEEN:1. SRI CHIKKANNAS/O CHIKKANNA AGED...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 04 1993

State of Karnataka Vs. Mohammed Illyas

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Oct-04-1993

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 86, 200, 207 and 213(3); Karnataka Motor Vehicle Rules, 1989 - Rules 81A and 259(2); Constitution of India - Article 14; Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 129A

Reported in : ILR1993KAR2812; 1994(3)KarLJ628

S.B. Majmudar, C.J.1. These Writ Appeals and Writ Petitions project a common question centering-round the powers of the authorities functioning under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 and Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 in so far as they...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 24 1943

T. Syed FakruddIn Saib and ors. Vs. Katta Ramayya Setti and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-24-1943

Subject : property

Reported in : AIR1944Mad299

Somayya, J.1. This second appeal raises an important question on the construction to be placed on the wording of Section 41, T. P. Act. The facts that led to this appeal are these.2. The appellants are...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 02 1936

Khaji Dodda Khaji Saib and ors. Vs. Chigamalla Nanjappa and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-02-1936

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1937)1MLJ197

Varadachariar, J.1. This second appeal arises out of a suit brought on behalf of the Hindu residents of a village in Bellary District for an injunction restraining the defendants from constructing a Jumma Masjid which they...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 13 1935

Bhavansi Rangappa and anr. Vs. Kamisetti Venkataswami

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-13-1935

Subject : Civil

Reported in : 163Ind.Cas.177; (1936)70MLJ537

Varadachariar, J.1. The main point for decision in this second Appeal is a question of limitation and that turns upon the true legal effect of certain transactions which took place between the parties and one Subramaniam...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 29 1936

Addepalli Lakshmanaswamy Vs. Gadireddi Narasimha Rao

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-29-1936

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : AIR1937Mad223; (1937)1MLJ414

Varadachariar, J.1. This is an appeal by the defendant against a decree on a promissory note (Ex. A) admittedly executed by him in favour of a Marwari firm of Rajahmundry for Rs. 3,250. The defence on...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial