Advanced Search Results

Ripen Kumar Vs. Department of Customs

Court : Delhi

Subject : Customs

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), 1973 - Sections 244; The Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 135(1); Gold (Control) Act, 1968 - Sections 85

Reported in : 2001CriLJ1288; 2000(72)ECC722

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. O.N. Vohra, Sr. Adv. and; Mr. Akshay Anand, Adv

ORDERUsha Mehra, J.1. The petitioner has raised questions of law which have far reaching effect, namely:- 1) Whether an order, passed in exercise of revisional powers under Cr.P.C. by a Sessions Judge can be set aside...

The Commissioner of Customs Vs. M/S. Leela Scottish Lace Ltd and Anoth ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Service Tax

Advocate for Appellant : For the Petitioner: Raveendran, Addl. Solicitor General along with N.R. Bhaskar, Sr. Central Government Standing Counsel and K.N. Mohan, Advocate. For the Respondents: Naresh Thacker, Adv A/w, Ajay J.N., Adv for M/s. K G Raghavan Assts, Advocates.

(Prayer: These tax referred cases are referred by the Assistant Registrar, Customs, Excise and Service Tax, Appellate Tribunal U/s. 130A of Customs Act, in Appeal No. C/105/02, No. C/161,162/02 and No. C/166/02 for the opinion of...

The State of Karnataka Vs. Gopalakrishna Nelli and Others

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Karnataka Municipalities (Guidance of Officers, Grant of Copies and Miscellaneous Provisions) Rules, 1966 - Rule 39; Transfer of Propety Act, 1882 - Sections 54 and 118; Public Health Act, 1875 - Sections 174; Infants Relief Act, 1874

Reported in : AIR1992Kant198; 1991(2)KarLJ270

Advocate for Appellant : Sri N.K. Gupta, G.A. and ;Sri T.S. Ramachandra, Adv.

1. The parties are referred to as arrayed in W.A. No. 1959; 1989.2. The Government of Karnataka by its order No. HUD 352 TMI) 79 Bangalore, dated 5th of June 1981 accorded sanction to the proposal...

Ram Gopal Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Armed Forces Headquarters Civil Service (Promotion to grades of Senior Civilian Staff Officers, Civilian Staff Officers and Superintendent') Regulations, 1968 - Regulation 4(4); Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 32; Armed Forces Headquarters Civil Service Rule, 1968 - Rule 20; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 123

Reported in : ILR1972Delhi446

Advocate for Appellant : P.N. Lekhi,; R.M. Mehta and; B. Kirpal, Advs

Sachar, J.(1) This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking to quash the list of. appointment of Superintend ents Class Ii Gazetted (annexure 'C') prepared by respondents 1 to 3 in...

A.N. Shukul Vs. Philips India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 23; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 617; Constitution of India - Articles 12 and 14

Reported in : 165(2009)DLT58

Advocate for Appellant : Naresh Kaushik,; Satish Dayanandan and; Aditi Gupta, Ad

S. Muralidhar, J.1. This suit seeks a declaration that the termination of the services of the Plaintiff by the Defendants was illegal and seeks a consequential mandatory injunction directing the Defendants to pay the Plaintiff damages...

N.M. Giri S/O S.N. Muniswami, Vs. Amr Power Pvt. Ltd.,

Court : Karnataka

Subject : ElectricityProperty

Acts : Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 2(49) and 164; Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 - Sections 10 to 19, 19A, 16 and 17; Electricity Supply Act, 1943 - Sections 28(1) and 29; Electricity Act, 1910; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2009(6)KarLJ267; 2009(6)AIRKarR44

Advocate for Appellant : Ashokharanahalli, Assts,; Sharath and Associates, Advs.

ORDERAjit J. Gunjal, J.1. Both these writ petitions are disposed of by this common order, in as much as, common question of law arises for consideration.2. In both these writ petitions the petitioners are essentially questioning...

Mohammed Ibrahim Vs. Dist. Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Kolar an ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Consumer

Acts : Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 13; Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 24

Reported in : AIR2002Kant176

Advocate for Appellant : S. Shivaswamy, Adv.

ORDERV. Gopala Gowda, J1. Petitioner is running a paddy husking industry. A back billing demand notice as per Annexure-E dated 21-6-1999 was issued to the petitioner for a sum of Rs. 82,128/- in respect of the...

Maniram Industrial Enterprises Repr. by Its General Manager Mrs. A.S. ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Transfer of Properly Act - Sections 5, 106, 108 and 109; Karnataka Rent Control Act, 1961

Reported in : AIR2006Kant262; ILR2006KAR2466; 2006(4)KarLJ675

Advocate for Appellant : N.K. Gupta, Adv.

V. Gopala Gowda, J.1. In these two appeals the respondent is the landlord/plaintiff and appellant is the tenant/defendant. The petition schedule premises were rented-out to the tenant by the father of the plaintiff. The parties are...

Latesh and ors Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. N.K. Gupta

* HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO No.502/2011 Date of Decision:20. 03.2013 LATESH & ORS. Through: Appellants. Mr. N.K. Gupta, Adv. Versus UNION OF INDIA Through: Defendants. Ms.Shilpa Singh, Adv. CORAM :HONBLE MR.JUSTICE...

Kalika & Anr vs.union of India

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. N.K. Gupta, Mr. Joydeep Mazumdar, Mr. Rohit Dutta, Mr. Kamlesh Kumar, Ms. Momota Bhattacharya, Ms. Priyata Chakraborty

$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:30. h May, 2018 FAO4622011 KALIKA & ANR ..... Appellants Through: Mr. N.K. Gupta, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA ..... Respondent...