Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: mr murlidhar · Page 1 of about 44 results (0.068 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 24 1996

Sardar and Another Vs. Ram Khilauna and Others

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Sep-24-1996

Subject : ContractProperty

Acts : Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 62; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 145; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 41, Rule 11; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 41; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 19

Reported in : AIR1997All268

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Murlidhar, ;G.N. Sharma and ;Rudeshwari Prasad, Advs.

1. Two set of suits, one by respondents being suit No. 58 of 1969 which was filed by Ram Khilauna, Charni, Rathi, since deceased represented by legal represenlati ves, hereafter called convenantees the term which has...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 21 1965

In Re: Tamappa and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jul-21-1965

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 157, 344, 423 and 540; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 40, 302 and 324

Reported in : AIR1967Mys71; 1967CriLJ565

Advocate for Appellant : Appa Rao, Adv.

Somnath Iyer, J. 1. In the village of Chintanapally in the District of Gulbarga, there lived two brothers Chintalayya and Hanumappa. Hanumappa had 4 sons and they are the four appellants before us. Chintalayya had a...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 28 2020

Odiyoor Sri Vivdhoddesha Souharda Sahakari Vs. Commissioner Of Income ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Feb-28-2020

Subject : Land Acquisition

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE28H DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2020 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA S.DIXIT REVIEW PETITION No.51 OF2020(T-IT) C/W REVIEW PETITION NOS. 52, 53, 54, 57, 58,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 11 2008

Sabir Mohammad Yusuf (D.) Through L.Rs. Vs. Sabir Abdul Rahman

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Apr-11-2008

Subject : Property

Reported in : 2008(3)AWC2190

Amitava Lala, J.1. As agreed upon by the learned Counsel appearing for the parties, the appeal is heard on informal papers. Now let us consider the merit of the appeal.2. The following reliefs are prayed in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 25 1996

Baij Nath Dubey and ors. Vs. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad, Chairman and or ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Sep-25-1996

Subject : Contempt of Court

Acts : Avas Vikas Parishad Act - Sections 28; Land Acquisition Act - Sections 18; Avas Evam Vikas Parishad Rule, 1968

Reported in : 1997CriLJ2681

Advocate for Appellant : Pradeep Kumar Mishra, Adv.

ORDERA.B. Srivastava, JJ.1. At one stage parties to this case, both of them, gave the Court to understand that the issues were resolved by an agreement and compromise recorded and when the Court proceeded to consign...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 30 1997

Pakkirisamy Vs. State of T.N.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-30-1997

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - , - Sections 164; Evidence Act, - Sections 27

Reported in : 1997(2)ALD(Cri)695; 1998CriLJ89; JT1997(8)SC310; 1997(6)SCALE315; (1997)8SCC158; 1998(1)LC101(SC)

1. The Sessions Court of East Thanjavur at Nagappattinam as also the High Court at Madras by their concurrent judgments and orders found the appellant guilty of the offences punishable under Sections 302 and 392 IPC...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 12 2012

The Commissioner of Income Tax And#8211; 10 Vs. M/S. Indian Oil Corpor ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-12-2012

Subject : Direct Taxation

M.S. Sanklecha, J. This appeal by the revenue under section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) challenges an order dated 24/11/2010 of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (hereinafter referred...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 13 2004

Smt. Vimla Devi G. Maheshwari and anr. Vs. D.D. Mohindra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-13-2004

Subject : PropertyDirect Taxation

Acts : Income - Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 269UD; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2004(3)ALLMR317; 2004(5)BomCR263; (2004)190CTR(Bom)306; [2004]268ITR102(Bom); 2004(4)MhLj58

Advocate for Appellant : J.D. Mistri, Adv.

R.M. Lodha J.1. In respect of the immovable property being Flat No. 16, 4th Floor, 'D' Road, Churchgate, Bombay, owned by respondent No. 3, Shri Nandlal G. Kejriwal, the petitioners entered into an agreement on July...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 20 1964

Damodhar Rao Vs. Bhima Rao and anr.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Nov-20-1964

Subject : Property

Acts : Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Sections 14; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 11

Reported in : AIR1965Kant290; AIR1965Mys290; ILR1964KAR1119; (1965)1MysLJ351

(1) The appellant is the purchaser of the suit house from respondent No. 2 under a sale-deed dated 26-4-1954 for a sum of Rs. 600/- (O.S.). Respondent No. 2 is the widow of the cousin brother...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 13 1967

State of Mysore Vs. Narsappa and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jun-13-1967

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 342, 364, 438, 533 and 535; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 147, 341, 447 and 504

Reported in : AIR1967Mys214; 1967CriLJ1540; (1967)2MysLJ145

Advocate for Appellant : G.M. Rego, for State Public Prosecutor

ORDER1. This is a reference made by the learned Sessions Judge, Raichur, under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The facts of the case may be briefly stated as follows: 2. Rajsekhar, the complainant,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial