Advanced Search Results

Executive Engineer Vs. Harisingh Modhbhai Gadhvi

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Evidence Act; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 10, 25F, 25G and 25H

Reported in : [2008(116)FLR334]; (2008)ILLJ653Guj

Advocate for Appellant : Sandhya Natani, AGP

H.K. Rathod, J.1. Heard learned Assistant Government Pleader Ms. Sandhya Natani for the petitioner and Mr. H.S. Mulia, learned Advocate appearing for respondent workman in this petition.2. Through this petition, petitioner is challenging the award made...

Bhavarlal Jagmalji Bisnoi and anr. Vs. State of Gujarat.

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) (Cr.P.C) - Section 439; Bombay Prohibition Act - Sections 66(B), 65(a)(e), 116(b), 81

Advocate for Appellant : MR P.Y.DIVYESHWAR; MR H.S.MULIA, Advs.

1. Rule. Mr.Ashish Desai, Learned APP, waives service of notice of Rule on behalf of respondent-State.2. The applicants original accused Nos.1 & 2 have preferred the present application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal...

Ramakanta Sahoo Vs. Suresh Prasad Panda

Court : Orissa

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. S.R. Mulia, Mr. Mulia

HIGH COURT OF ORISSA : CUTTACK CRLMC NO.661 OF 200.In the matter of an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. -------------Ramakanta Sahoo …… Petitioner -VersusSuresh Prasad Panda …… Opp. Party For Petitioner...

Deepak Kumar Dash Vs. State of Orissa

Court : Orissa

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 2010(I)OLR227

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Mulia

Pradip Mohanty, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 27.4.1999 passed by the learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Cuttack in Sessions Trial No. 220 of 1997 convicting the appellant under Section 302...

Bhupatiraju Sreeramaraju and ors. Vs. Nadimpalli Pullam Raju and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Law

Reported in : AIR1963AP403

Advocate for Appellant : A. Gangadhara Rao, ;M. Bhujangarao, ;P. Sitaramaraju, ;M. Suryanarayana Murty and ;Ch. Ramakrishna Rao, Advs.

Umamaheswaram, J.1. Both these Letters Patent Appeals are directed against the judgment and decree of our learned brother Sanjeeva Row Nayudu J., in Appeals No. 214 of 1956. Defendants 21, 4 and 5 are the appellants...