Advanced Search Results

Shagun Mahila Udyogik Sahakari Sanstha Maryadit Vs. State of Maharasht ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Maharashtra Co operative Societies Act, 1960.; Constitution of India - Article 32; Public Trust Act, 1950,; Societies Registration Act, 1860,; Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, ; Company registered under the Companies Act, 1956. ; Prevention of Food Adulteration Act ; Food Adulteration Prohibition Act, 1954.

1. Leave granted. 2. The instant appeal is directed against the final judgment and order of the High Court of judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench at Nagpur dated 9th September, 2010, in Writ Petition No. 4210...

G.D. Sharma Vs. University Grants Commission and Another

Court : Delhi

Subject : Constitution

Acts : University Grants Commission Act, 1956 - Sections 25(2)

Reported in : 1999VAD(Delhi)917; 81(1999)DLT731; 1999(51)DRJ160

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Mukul Rohtagi, Sr. Adv. and; Mr. Gaurav Duggal, Adv

ORDERA.K. Sikri, J. 1. By this order I shall dispose of CM Nos. 7842/99 and 8025/99. 2. Let me state the facts in brief first. Petitioner is working as 'Senior fellow and Head' Higher Education Unit,...

Om Parkash Pahwa and ors. Vs. State of Delhi and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 2(41), 82, 86(1), 99 and 100(1 and 2); Delhi Motor Vehicles Rules, 1993; Constitution of India - Articles 74, 163 and 239AA

Reported in : 1998VAD(Delhi)285; 3(1998)CLT609; 75(1998)DLT3; 1998(46)DRJ719

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Mukul Rohtagi, Sr. Adv., ; Ms. Rani Chhabra,; Mr. Arun

ORDERR.C. Lahoti, J.1. This common order shall govern the disposal of CWP Nos.3000/98, 2979/98, 3019/98, 3020/98 AND 3125/98 laying challenge to a public notification dated 15.6.1998 issued by the Govt of NCT Delhi under Section 100(3)...

Federation of Indian Airlines and ors. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226, 19(1)(g), 162, 14; Societies Registration Act, 1860; Companies Act, 1956; Airports Authority of India Act 1994 - Sections 42, 12A

Advocate for Appellant : Mr.Mukul Rohtagi And Ors.

1. Whether reporters of the local papers be allowed to see the judgment? Yes2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? Yes3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Yes 1. Invoking the...

Union of India Vs. Maj. General V.K. Sharma

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2000IVAD(Delhi)13; 84(2000)DLT614; 2000(53)DRJ491; 2000(5)SLR29

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Mukul Rohtagi, Addl. Solicitor General,; Mr. Rakesh Tiku and;

ORDERARUN KUMAR, J.1. The only question for consideration in this appeal is whether on 30th April, 1996 a post of Lt. General was available to which the respondent could have been promoted. There is no dispute...

Prem Garg and ors Vs Glencore GraIn Rotterdam B.V.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Arbitration and Conciliation

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - section 49

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Mukul Rohtagi, Sr ; Mr.Anshuj Dhingra, Advs.

1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment? No2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? Yes3. Whether the Judgment should be reported in the Digest?ORDER.1. These Appeals assail the...

Kartongen Kemi Och Forvaltning Ab and ors. Vs. State Through Cbi

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 227 and 228; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120B, 161, 420 and 465; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 - Sections 5(1) and 5(2); Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 63 and 78(6)

Reported in : 2004(72)DRJ693

Advocate for Appellant : Alok Sen Gupta, Sr. Adv.,; Rajan Narain,; Sajan Narain,

J.D. Kapoor, J.1. The petitioners, M/s A.B. Bofors, S.P. Hinduja, G.P. Hinduja and P.P. Hinduja, have through these petitions challenged the impugned order dated 14.11.2002 passed by the learned Special Judge whereby he has charged them...

P.K. JaIn Vs. the Commissioner Municipal Corporation of Delhi and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1999IIAD(Delhi)317; 79(1999)DLT380

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Mukul Rohtagi Sr. Advocate and; Mr. Rahul Gupta, Advs

ORDERK. Ramamoorthy, J.1. The petitioner, who was Junior Engineer, in the M.C.D., has filed this writ petition. A charge memo was issued to him on 25.4.1984. The statement of allegations against the petitioner is :- 'Shri...

M/S. Hindustan Antibiotics Ltd. Vs. M/S. Hindustan Max Gb Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 37; Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 - Sections 9, 11(6), 17(3), 18(4) and 26; Delhi High Court Act, 1966 - Sections 10; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 39, Rule 3

Reported in : 91(2001)DLT688; 2001(59)DRJ28; 2002(1)RAJ428

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Mukul Rohtagi, Addl. Solicitor General and; Mr. Jay Savla, Advs

ORDERMukul Mudhal, J.1. This is an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as 'the said Act'), filed by the original respondent M/s Hindustan Antibiotics Ltd., against the orders...

M/S Essar Steel Limited Vs Gail (i) Ltd and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Companies

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 391 , 394

Advocate for Appellant : Mr Mukul Rohtagi, Sr, Adv.

1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?2. To be referred to the Reporter or not?3. Whether the judgment should be reported in Digest? ORDERCM No.9308-09/2010 Allowed, subject to all just...