Advanced Search Results
Echo Shella Vs. Cit-i
Punjab and Haryana
Jul-24-2006
Direct Taxation
[2007]293ITR234(P& H)
Mr. Mukhi
ORDER1. The assessee has approached this court by filing the present appeal against the order of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench '13' ('the Tribunal') arising out of I.T.A. No. 6494/Chd./96 for the assessment year 1992-93,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskChand Parkash Vij Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax
Punjab and Haryana
Dec-12-2008
Direct Taxation
[2009]315ITR251(P& H)
1. The assessee has preferred this appeal under Section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (for short, 'the Act'), against the order dated May 25, 2007, passed by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Amritsar Bench, in I.T.A....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPenguIn Books Ltd. Vs. India Book Distributors and ors.
Delhi
Aug-01-1984
Media and CommunicationIntellectual Property Rights
Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 18, 53(1) and 55(1); Copyright (Amendment) Act, 1983 - Sections 3; Sea Customs Act, 1878 - Sections 19; English Copyright Act, 1956 - Sections 49(2); Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act - Sections 16
AIR1985Delhi29; 26(1984)DLT316
B.R. Aggarwal,; P.B. Agarwal,; Soli J. Sorabjee,;
Avadh Behari Rohatgi, J. (1) The appellants, Penguin Books Ltd of England original plaintiffs brought a suit for perpetual injunction against the respondents, M/s. India Book Distributors of New Delhi, Bombay, Madras, Calcutta (original defendants) restraining...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Rajender Kumar Sharma and Another Vs. the Registrar, Co-operative Soci ...
Delhi
Nov-15-1996
Trusts and SocietiesProperty
Constitution of India - Article 226; Delhi Co-operative Societies Act, 1972 - Sections 26, 55 and 60; Co-operative Societies Rules - Rules 24, 25 and 30(4)
AIR1997Delhi189
P. Nandrajog, Adv
ORDER1. The petitioners through the present petition have sought a declaration that the decision of the Registrar, respondent No. 1, conveyed vide letter dated June 18, 1985 to Harsh Vihar Co-operative House Building Society, respondent No....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMohan Lal Kukreja Vs. Sunder Kukreja and Others
Delhi
Jun-03-2016
Land Acquisition
1. Whereas Mohan Lal Kukreja fights for not only his reputation but even an asset, his brother Madan Lal Kukreja fights to protect his reputation because a finding of fact has been returned against them that...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSabitri Devi Bhotika and ors. Vs. S.A.E. (India) Ltd.
Delhi
Aug-25-1988
Commercial
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 37, Rule 3
1988(15)DRJ295
G.L. Sanghvi,; D.P. Bhandari,; Rachna Joshi,;
S.S. Chadha, J. (1) S.A.E. (India) Ltd., plaintiff, took on lease in June, 1966 from defendant No. I, Smt. Sabitri Devi Bhotika, premises No. 2-B, Victoria Terrace, Calcutta. The tenancy was surrendered on May 22, 1978...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: Indian and Eastern
Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC
Feb-10-1975
MRTP
(1976)46CompCas165NULL
1. On September 23, 1974, the Commission ordered the Director of Research to carry out a study of restrictive and monopolistic trade practices in the business of advertising in newspapers and periodicals and on November 4,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPower Grid Corpn. of (I) Ltd. Vs. Rpg Transmission Ltd.
Delhi
Jul-01-2015
Land Acquisition
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on February 12, 2015 Judgment delivered on July 01, 2015 + ARB.P. Nos.539/1999, 540/1999, 541/1999, 542/1999 & 544/1999 POWER GRID CORPN. OF (I) LTD....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUnion of India and anr. Vs. Tata Engineering and Locomotive Co. Ltd.
Mumbai
Mar-22-1971
Company
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 17(1), 293(1), 370, 391 and 394; Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 - Sections 2, 3, 20, 20(1), 21, 21(1), 22, 22(1), 23, 23(1), 23(2), 23(3), 23(4), 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30 and 48(2); Banking Regulation Act, 1949 - Sections 22
[1972]42CompCas72(Bom)
K.H. Bhabha, Adv.
Mody, J. 1. These are two appeals by the Union of India and the Regional Director, Company Law Board, Western Region, Bombay, against a common judgment but two separate orders passed in Company Petitions Nos. 159...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Union of India and anr. Vs. Tata Engineering, Locomotive Co. Ltd. ...
Mumbai
Mar-22-1971
MRTP
Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 - Sections 2 and 23(1)
AIR1972Bom301; (1972)74BOMLR1; ILR1972Bom228
K.H. Bhabha and ;P.M. Mukhi, Advs.
Mody, J.1. These are two appeals by the Union of India and the Regional Director, Company Law Board, Western Region, Bombay, against a common Judgment but two separate orders passed in Company Petitions Nos. 159 of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »