Advanced Search Results

Pappu Vs. the State

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1981WLN(UC)284

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Mehta

M.B. Sharma, J.1. Accused appellant Pappu has been convicted by the learned Addititional Sessions Judge, Hanumangarh Under Section 376 IPC and sentenced to undergo four years rigorous imprisonment and to pay a fine of Rs. 500/-,...

Sanjeevkumar P. and anr. Vs. State Bank of India and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : State Bank of India Act, 1955 - Sections 43; State Bank of India (Supervising Staff) Service Rules - Rule 31; State bank of India Officers (Determination of Terms and Conditions of Service) Order, 1979; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 16

Reported in : (1989)2GLR747

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. N. J. Mehta, Mr. Mehta

Chauhan, J.1. Petitioners, some of the Officers in Junior Management Grade Scale 1 of the State Bank of India, have by this petition under Art. 226 of the Constitution of India, challenged the circular dated July...

Om Prakash Joshi, Advocate and ors Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 24, 24(1), 24(4), 24(8), 35 and 321; Constitution of India - Articles 13, 13(3), 14, 16, 16(1), 124(2), 126, 162, 163, 165, 165(2), 165(3), 216, 217, 217(1), 217(2), 222, 222(1), 226, 319, 361(1), 367 and 368 ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 2(7) - Order 3, Rule 4(2) and Rule 4(6); General Clauses Act - Sections 13; Advocates Act, 1961 ;

Reported in : AIR2002Raj33; 2001(3)WLC199; 2001(3)WLN632

Advocate for Appellant : D.R. Bhandari, Adv.

Lakshmanan, C.J. (1). The petitioners in the instant writ petition are the practicing advocates at Jodhpur. They filed the writ petition with the followingprayers:-'It is, therefore, prayed that a writ, direction or order or in the...

Sicom Ltd. Vs. Parca Paper Industries Limited and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Banking

Acts : State Financial Corporation Act, 1951 - Sections 29, 31, 31(1), 31(2), 32, 32(1), 32(1A), 32(6), 32(7) and 99; State Financial Corporation (Amendment) Act, 1985; Bombay Court Fees Act, 1959 - Schedule - Articles 1 and 7; Limitation Act - Schedule - Article 137; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 2(2) and 51

Reported in : 2008(6)ALLMR7; 2008(5)BomCR524; (2008)110BOMLR2849; 2009(1)MhLj921

Advocate for Appellant : Kevic Setalvad and ;P. Panjabi, Advs.

Roshan Dalvi, J.1. The Petitioner granted a loan of Rs. 4.37 crores to Respondent No. 1. Respondent Nos.2 to 7 guaranteed the repayment of the said loan under deeds of personal guarantee and corporate guarantees executed...

Vardhman Developers Ltd. Vs. Borla Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. a ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Mehta

P.C. By this motion, the applicants (some of the original defendants) seek rejection of the plaint under Order VII rule 11(d) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. Plaintiffs have filed a suit inter alia praying...

State of Orissa Vs. Mohd. Yunus and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Reported in : 1994Supp(2)SCC55

K. Ramaswamy and; N.P. Singh, JJ.1. We have heard the counsel on either side. Leave granted.2. This appeal arises against the order of the tribunal made in O.A. No. 1005 of 1989 dated March 22, 1993....

Progetto Grano S.P.A. Vs. Shri Lal Mahal Limited

Court : Delhi

Subject : Arbitration and Conciliation

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 49, 48; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 3 Rule 4

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Jayant K. Mehta; Ms. Tanya Khare; Mr. Sukant Vikram, Advs.

1. By this order I shall dispose of the objections raised by the defendant vide the affidavit dated 10.08.2011 to Mr. Jayant K.Mehta, Advocate appearing on behalf of the plaintiff. The affidavit has been filed on...

State of Bombay (Now Maharashtra) Vs. Narul Latif Khan

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 311, 311(2) and 353; Public Servants Inquiries Act, 1850

Reported in : AIR1966SC269; (1966)IILLJ595SC; 1966MhLJ46(SC); [1965]3SCR135

Gajendragadkar, C.J.1. The short question of law which arises in this appeal is whether theappellant, the State of Bombay (now Maharashtra), shows that its predecessorState of Madhya Pradesh (hereinafter called the Government) had given areasonable opportunity...

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. New India Industries Ltd.

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 6, 9, 10, 12, 14, 17, 17(1), 17(3), 22, 28, 30, 31, 32, 32(1), 33, 34, 35, 36, 36(1), 37, 37(1), 38, 38(2), 39, 40, 41(1) and 80J

Reported in : (1992)106CTR(Guj)374; [1993]201ITR208(Guj)

Advocate for Appellant : B.J. Shelat, Adv.

S.D. Shah, J. 1. On being moved under section 256 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, by the Commissioner of Income-tax, Ahmedabad, by four Reference Applications Nos. 523 to 526/Add. of 1976-77, and also being moved by...

In Re: Reliance Petroleum Ltd.

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 391(1) and 391(2); Constitution of India - Article 226; Companies (Court) Rules, 1959

Reported in : [2010]154CompCas286(Guj)

Advocate for Appellant : K.S. Nanavati,; S.N. Soparkar,; S.N. Shelat,;

Jayant Patel, J.1. The present petition is preferred by the petitioning transferor company-M/s. Reliance Petroleum Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as 'RPL' for the sake of convenience), seeking sanction to the scheme of amalgamation with the transferee...