Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: mr mayur shroff · Page 1 of about 4 results (0.034 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

May 30 2003

Jyoti Structures Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs and Central

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on : May-30-2003

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Mayur Shroff

1. The question for consideration in this appeal is whether in order for the appellant to obtain refund of duty paid by it in excess, it is required to establish as provided in Sub-section (2) of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 08 2003

Jyoti Structures Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Cus. and C. Ex.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-08-2003

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2003)(90)ECC214

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Mayur Shroff

1.The question for consideration in this appeal is whether in order for the appellant to obtain refund of duty paid by it in excess, it is required to establish as provided in Sub-section (2) of Section...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 01 2002

Shalu Dyeing and Printing Mills Vs. Commr. of Cus. and C. Ex.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-01-2002

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2003)(152)ELT352Tri(Mum.)bai

1. This is an appeal filed by the appellant against the decision of the Collector of Customs and Central Excise, Surat, made in Order-in-Original No. 5/MP/93, dated 9-3-1993 whereunder he confirmed a duty of Rs. 1,34,8917-...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 04 2002

Surat Ahmedabad Transport Pvt. Vs. Commr. of C. Ex. (Adj.)

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-04-2002

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2002)(145)ELT691Tri(Mum.)bai

1. The appeals are taken up for disposal with consent after waiving deposit.2. In the order impugned in this appeal, the Commissioner has confirmed the demand for duty of around Rs. 8.36 crores and imposed penalty...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial