Advanced Search Results

Mrs. Veena Kalia Vs. Dr. Jatinder Nath Kalia and Another

Court : Delhi

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 13, 24 and 25; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 142; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 115; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 11 and 13; Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956 - Sections 23

Reported in : AIR1996Delhi54; 59(1995)DLT635

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Manmohan, Adv

1. These appeals are by the appellant-wife against the order dated 23 November, 1985 of the Additional District Judge, Delhi, whereby her two petitions, one for divorce under the Hindu Marriage Act. 1955 (for short 'the...

N.K. Sharma and anr. Vs. Presiding Officer and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2000IIIAD(Delhi)1048

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Manmohan, Adv

ORDERA.K. Sikri, J.1. This petition is preferred against Award dated 21.9.1996 passed by Central Government Industrial Tribunal in ID No. 117/88. The petitioner had challenged his transfer by raising the aforesaid dispute and by the impugned...

S.A. Builders Vs. Delhi Development Authority

Court : Delhi

Subject : LimitationArbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 30 and 33

Reported in : 1998VAD(Delhi)905; 1998(2)ARBLR472(Delhi); 75(1998)DLT456; 1999(48)DRJ288

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Manmohan, Adv

ORDERS.K. Mahajan, J.1. By judgment dated July 27,1990 passed in Suit No.2346/97 & I.A.1675/88 and Suit No.287-A/88 this Court had set aside the award dated 12th October,1987 passed by the Arbitrator in so far as the...

Dj Singh (Retd.)(Commodore) Vs. New Delhi Municipal Council

Court : Delhi

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 226

Reported in : 1998IVAD(Delhi)313; 73(1998)DLT664; 1998(45)DRJ573

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. V.K. Makhija,; Ms. Vandana Khurana,; Mr. Manmohan,;

ORDERDr. M.K. Sharma, J.1. Since all the three writ petitions (C.W. 2900/1997, C.W. 3456/1997 and C.W. 2053/1998) involve similar facts and identical question of law, I propose to dispose of all the aforesaid writ petitions by...

Mukund Swarup Mishra Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Commercial

Reported in : JT2007(3)SC200; 2007(1)SCALE129; (2007)2SCC536

Advocate for Appellant : Gopal Subramanam, ASG, (A.C.),; Manjit Singh, AAG,; Ram Jeth

C.K. Thakker, J.1. Interim applications have been filed by the applicants who are aggrieved by the Report made by a Committee appointed by this Court while dealing with and deciding transferred cases in Onkar Lal Bajaj...

Ms Srimathi Bangera Vs. President (Acting)

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE27H DAY OF APRIL2017BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAGHVENDRA S. CHAUHAN W.P.Nos.11335-11336/2017 (LB-ELE) D/o Venkappa Aged about 50 years, R/at Gowli Street, Madikeri, Kodagu- 571...

Syndicate Bank Vs. N.r. Bhat

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : PUNEET TANEJA __

2023 INSC1064REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA EXTRAORDINARY APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) No.7277 OF2020SYNDICATE BANK ..... Petitioner VERSUS N.R. BHAT ..... Respondent ORDER1 The Petitioner-Bank is aggrieved by an order...

Rahul Yadav and Anr. Vs. M/S. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. and Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.4909 OF2015(@ SLP(C) No.14256 OF2014 Rahul Yadav & Anr. ... Appellants Versus M/s. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. and Others ... Respondents JUDGMENT Dipak Misra, J.Leave...

Maharashtra Power Development Corpn. Ltd. Vs. Dabhol Power Company

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 260, 262, 286, 397 and 621A - Schedule - Regulations 72 and 75

Reported in : 2004(3)BomCR317; (2004)3CompLJ58(Bom); [2004]52SCL224(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : T.R. Andhyarajuna, ;N.H. Seervai and ;R. Chitnis, Advs.

R.M. Lodha, J.1. The Maharashtra Power Development Corporation (MPDC) is the appellant; which we shall call 'the petitioner'. The company petition for diverse reliefs was filed by the petitioner under Sections 397, 402, 403 and 406...

Sanjeev Kumar Chaswal Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property

Reported in : 2012(5)CTC(IP)22

SURESH KAIT, J. 1. Vide the instant petition, the petitioner is seeking the following reliefs:- “I. Issue a writ of certiorari thereby quashing the illegal opinion of the Vice Chairman IPAB wherein the Vice Chairman has...