Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: mr m vaidyanathan · Page 1 of about 21 results (0.108 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 22 2012

The Principal Vs. P.Thangam.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-22-2012

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 10(4); Industrial Dispute Rules, 1958 - Rule 48(2), 10-B(9)

Advocate for Appellant : Mr.M.Vaidyanathan, Adv.

O R D E R1. This is a very unfortunate case and for wrong reasons, the parties are before this Court. The petitioner is Kendriya Vidyalaya School, Kattobomman, Vijayanarayanam, Nanguneri Taluk, represented by its Principal. The...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 25 2005

The General Manager (Telecom) Madurai Secondary Switching Area, Depart ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-25-2005

Subject : CivilArbitration

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 136 and 226; Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 5, 11, 11(2), 11(3), 11(6), 11 (4) , 12, 13, 16, 20 and 34; ;Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 8

Reported in : 2005(4)CTC437; (2005)4MLJ210

Advocate for Appellant : V.T. Gopalan, Additional Solicitor General of India ;assisted by S. Udayakumar, Sr. Central Government Standing counsel, ;V.G. Sureshkumar, ;T.S. Sivagnanam, Advs. ;S. Manikumar, Sr. Central

P. Sathasivam, J.1. Aggrieved by the orders passed by Hon'ble Chief Justice or his nominee Judge in Original Petitions filed under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'),...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 16 2016

Minor R.K. Jayavardhani and Another Vs. The Chairman, Central Board of ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-16-2016

Subject : Land Acquisition

(Common Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the entire records connected with the proceedings of 2nd respondent, vide F.110331-01/2016/KVS(HQ)/Acad. dated 14.03.2016 and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 10 2007

P. Udayakumar and ors. Vs. the Tamil Nadu Electricity Board Represente ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Sep-10-2007

Subject : Service

Acts : General Rules - Rules 2(1) and 39; Constitution of India - Article 16

Reported in : (2007)6MLJ694

Advocate for Appellant : R. Gandhi, Sr. Counsel for ;R.G. Narendhiran and ;R. Kamalarani, Advs.

ORDERV. Dhanapalan, J.1. The petitioners who are Technical Assistants-Mechanical in Mettur Thermal Power Station, Mettur Dam, Salem District, have filed this writ petition seeking issuance of a writ of certiorarified mandamus calling for the records relating...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 13 2009

M. Sellamuthu and ors. Vs. the State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by Its Secreta ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-13-2009

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 14

Reported in : (2009)5MLJ673

Advocate for Appellant : L. Chandrakumar, Adv.

ORDERK. Chandru, J.1. Heard Mr. L. Chandrakumar, learned Counsel representing Mr.S.Doraisamy for the petitioners and Mr. M. Vaidyanathan, learned standing Counsel for the respondent Electricity Board and perused the records.2. W.P. No. 40078 of 2005 was...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 24 1991

V. Venkatesan Vs. Karnataka Handlooms Development Corporation Ltd. and ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-24-1991

Subject : Service

Reported in : (1991)2MLJ130

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. M. Vaidyanathan

ORDERSomasundaram, J.1. The first respondent in this writ petition is a Corporation owned and controlled wholly by the State of Karnataka. The petitioner was appointed as the Sales Manager by the first respondent and was posted...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 12 2007

Dsq Software Ltd. Rep. by Its Director, Mr. S.K. Agarwal, Vs. the Spec ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Oct-12-2007

Subject : FERA

Acts : Companies Act, 1956; Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973; Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 - Sections 35F; Constitution of India - Articles 226, 226(2), 323A and 323B; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 20

Reported in : (2007)6MLJ1269

Advocate for Appellant : I. Subramaniam, Sr. Adv. for; M. Vaidyanathan, Adv.

ORDERV. Dhanapalan, J.1. Since the issues involved in all the four writ petitions are identical, these writ petitions are decided by this common order.2. While the petitioner in W.P. No. 25914 of 2007 is a Company...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 08 2013

A.Kumarasamy Vs. State of Tamilnadu

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-08-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :08. 07.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAJA W.P.No.21357 of 2011 A.Kumarasamy .. Petitioner -vs- 1. State of Tamilnadu rep.by its Secretary Department of Revenue Fort St.George Chennai...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 13 2009

N. Viswanathan and ors. Vs. Tamil Nadu Electricity Board Rep. by Its C ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-13-2009

Subject : Service

Acts : Right To Information Act; University Grants Commission Act, 1956 - Sections 3 and 22; All India Council for Technical Education Act - Sections 2; Electricity Supply Act, 1948 - Sections 79; Tamil Nadu Technical Education Subordinate Services Special Rules - Rule 9; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1) and 309; Tamil Nadu Electricity Board Service Regulations - Regulations 7, 94 and 106

Reported in : (2009)8MLJ1347

Advocate for Appellant : V. Ajoy Khose, Adv.

ORDERK. Chandru, J.1. Heard both sides.2. In the first batch of writ petitions, the petitioners, who were originally employed as Helpers in the first respondent Electricity Board, have sought for a direction to the respondents to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 22 2007

V. Shanthi Vs. the Chairman, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board,

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-22-2007

Subject : Service

Acts : Hindu Marriage Act - Sections 13(1)

Reported in : (2008)1MLJ598

Advocate for Appellant : V. Pushpa, Adv.

ORDERK. Chandru, J.1. I have heard Ms. V. Pushpa, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr. M. Vaidyanathan, learned Counsel representing the respondents and have perused the records.2. The petitioner is the daughter of one...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial