Advanced Search Results
Girdhar Kumar Dadhich and anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Jan-23-2009
Service
Constitution of India - Article 142
AIR2009SC1899; 2009(2)AWC1636(SC); JT2009(4)SC303; RLW2009(3)SC2751; 2009(2)SCALE98; (2009)2SCC706; 2009(3)SLJ10(SC):2009AIRSCW1494
M.R. Calla, Sr. Adv.,; Mukul Kumar,; Rishi Matoliya and;
S.B. Sinha, J.1. Leave granted.2. Interpretation of a decision of this Court in Kailash Chand Sharma v. State of Rajasthan and Ors. : [2002]SUPP1SCR317 is in question in this appeal which arises out of a judgment...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMunnabai Vs. The State of Maharashtra, Through the Secretary, Women an ...
Mumbai Aurangabad
Aug-26-2015
Education
Oral Judgment: 1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and heard finally by the consent of the parties. 2. The undisputed factors considering the submissions of the learned Advocates and the record available are as under: a....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNational Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Smt. Durgesh Nandini Sharma and ors.
Delhi
Oct-03-2011
Motor Vehicles
Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 110A, 92A
Mr. L.K. Tyagi, Adv.
1. By this common judgment, it is proposed to decide the aforesaid cross appeals filed against the judgment and award of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal dated 21.05.2001, whereby and whereunder a sum of ` 1,24,800/-...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Smt. Durgesh Nandini Sharma and ors.
Delhi
Oct-03-2011
Motor Vehicles
Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 110A, 92A
Mr. L.K. Tyagi, Adv.
1. By this common judgment, it is proposed to decide the aforesaid cross appeals filed against the judgment and award of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal dated 21.05.2001, whereby and whereunder a sum of ` 1,24,800/-...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskTushar Babanrao Deshmukh Vs. the State of Maharashtra and Others
Mumbai Nagpur
Dec-21-2012
Education
Oral Judgment: (B.R. Gavai, J.) Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard finally with consent of the learned Counsel for the parties. 2) The petitioner challenges the judgment and order dated 25/9/2012 passed by the learned Maharashtra...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBhootaram Vs. State and ors.
Rajasthan
Feb-02-1980
Service
1980WLN(UC)82a
Mr. M.R. Calla
S.K. Mal Lodha, J.1. The petitioner was initially appointed on the post of Patwari with effect from September 1, 1951. An order of compulsory retirement was passed vide order No. LR/Estt/5229 dated July 31,1978 by the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGurpal. Vs. High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan.
Supreme Court of India
Nov-27-2012
Service
Constitution Of India - Article 32; Rajasthan Civil Service (Classification, Control & Appeal) Rules, 1958 - Rules 16; Rajasthan Service Rules, 1951 - Rule 54
Surinder Singh Nijjar, J.1. In this petition, under Article 32 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner seeks a writ in the nature of Certiorari for quashing the order of suspension dated 20th December, 1985 by...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskManiben Vs. State of Gujarat
Supreme Court of India
Aug-07-2009
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 300, 302 and 304; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 313 and 378
JT2009(12)SC82; 2009(10)SCALE654; (2009)8SCC796
Mukundakam Sharma, J.1. The present appeal is filed against the judgment and order passed by the High Court of Gujarat holding that the case of the appellant herein is covered under Clause (4) of Section 300...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskChand Mal Chayal Vs. State of Rajasthan
Supreme Court of India
Sep-13-2006
Service
Constitution of India - Article 14; Rajasthan Subordinate Courts Ministerial Establishment Rules, 1986 - Rules 210 and 212; Rajasthan Service Rules, 1951
AIR2006SC3340; [2006(111)FLR753]; JT2006(12)SC73; 2006(9)SCALE362; (2006)10SCC258; 2006(2)LC1248(SC)
M.R. Calla, Sr. Adv.,; P.K. Manohar and; Rishi Matoliya,
H.K. Sema, J.1. The challenge in this appeal is to the order dated 24.9.2003 passed by the Division Bench in Special Appeal (Writ) No. 707 of 2002. By the aforesaid order the Division Bench set aside...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMadan Mohan Sharma and anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Feb-22-2008
Service
Rajasthan Panchayat Samitis and Zila Parishad (Service) Rules, 1959 - Rule 17(2); Rajasthan Panchayati Raj Rules, 1996 - Rules 266, 274 and 296
AIR2008SC1657; [2008(119)FLR1]; JT2008(3)SC304; RLW2008(4)SC3525; 2008(2)SCALE740; (2008)3SCC724
M.R. Calla, Sr. Adv.,; Mukul Kumar,; P.D. Sharma,;
A.K. Mathur, J.1. Leave granted.2. This appeal is directed against the order dated 19.12.2005 passed by the Division Bench of the Rajasthan High Court whereby the Division Bench of the Rajasthan High Court has disposed of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- Next ›
- Last »