Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: mr m dhandapani · Page 1 of about 38 results (0.093 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 12 2012

M.Kalaiselvi. Vs. the Inspector of Panchayat and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-12-2012

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Tamil Nadu Panchayat Act - Section 203; Constitution of India - Articles 226

Advocate for Appellant : Mr.M.Dhandapani, Adv.

Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records of the order passed by the first respondent in order dated 28.06.2012...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 03 2008

Xavier Dhanaraj Vs. the Secretary to Government, Public Works Departme ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-03-2008

Subject : Service

Acts : Tamil Nadu Civil Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules - Rule 17

Reported in : (2008)1MLJ1303

Advocate for Appellant : N.S. Nandakumar, Adv.

ORDERK. Chandru, J.1. The petitioner in all these seven writ petitions is the same person. He was working as Superintending Engineer, Public Works Department, Salem. He filed an Original Application being O.A. No. 2463 of 2002...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 01 2010

R.Pushpalatha, and ors. Vs. the Revenue Divisional Officer, Dharmapuri ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Oct-01-2010

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution Of India - Article 226

Advocate for Appellant : Mr.Vijay Narayan, Adv.

1. In these Writ Petitions, Petitioner(s) seek Writ of Mandamus directing the Respondent-Revenue Divisional Officer, Dharmapuri to consider and dispose of the applications made by the Petitioner(s) for issuance of Community Certificate for the Petitioner(s) son/daughter...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 16 2012

G.Pandi. Vs. the Commissioner, and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-16-2012

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act - Section 20, 20(1)(k), 20(2)(e) (f), 26, 27, 28, 32, 33, 36, 37, 38-A, 47, 49(2), 54; Coimbatore City Municipal Corporation Act - Section 432(10)(b) ; Town Panchayat Building Rules ; Development Control Rules ; Constitution of India - Articles 226, 23(2), 300A

Advocate for Appellant : Mr.V.Elangovan, Adv.

Prayer: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for a writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 and 2 to remove the encroachments made in Plot No.290A, Avvai Nagar,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 18 2013

S.Chandrasekaran Vs. State of Tamil Nadu

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-18-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated :18. 02.2013 Coram THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD K.SHARMA W.P.No.6381 of 2009 S.Chandrasekaran .. Petitioner .. Vs ..1. State of Tamil Nadu rep. by Collector of Cuddalore...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 08 2014

L.Saraswathi Vs. 1.The State of Tamil Nadu,

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-08-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:08. 08.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN W.P.(MD)No.10295 of 2009 and M.P.No.2 of 2009 L.Saraswathi : Petitioner Vs. 1.The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep by its Agricultural Production...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 25 2006

Vijay Foundation (P) Ltd. Rep. by Its Director, R. Thiagarajan Vs. the ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-25-2006

Subject : Property

Acts : Principal Act - Sections 3, 5, 7 to 12 and 48(2); Tamil Nadu Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Repeal Act, 1999 - Sections 4 and 33; Companies Act

Reported in : 2006(5)CTC52; (2006)4MLJ676

Advocate for Appellant : R. Muthukumarasamy, Sr. Counsel for ;G. Veerapathiran, Adv.

ORDERA. Kulasekaran, J.1. This writ petition is filed for the issuance of a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the connected records of the second respondent issued in his Proceedings Na.Ka. S.R. 154/98 dt. 24.2.1998...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 24 2009

KA. Manshoor Vs. Assistant Director, Enforcement Directorate, Governme ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-24-2009

Subject : FEMA

Acts : Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 - Sections 13, 13(1), 15, 37, 37(3) and 49; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 131, 131(1A), 132, 132(1), 147 and 272A(1); Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 - Sections 19(2); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 30 - Order 11, Rules 12, 14 and 15; Taxation on Income (Investigation Commission) Act, 1947; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 108; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 20(3) and 21; Evidence Act - Sections 24

Reported in : [2010]97SCL167(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : B. Kumar, SC for ;S. Ramachandran, Adv.

ORDERK. Chandru, J.1. Heard Mr. B. Kumar, learned Senior Counsel leading Mr. S. Ramachandran for the petitioner and Mr. M. Dhandapani, learned special counsel appearing for the Enforcement Directorate.2. The short question that arises for consideration...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 11 2007

The Superintendent of Police Vs. J. Muthiah Selvaraj and the Registrar ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-11-2007

Subject : ServiceCriminal

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 366

Reported in : (2007)6MLJ1228

Advocate for Appellant : M. Dhandapani, Adv.

ORDERF.M. Ibrahim Kalifulla, J.1. The superintendent of Police, Virudhunagar is the petitioner. The challenge is to the order of the State Administrative Tribunal dated 03.10.2001 passed in O.A.No. 2721 of 1996. By the order impugned in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 25 2010

Rathinammal Vs. the Managing Director, Tamilnadu Housing Board and the ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-25-2010

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act - Sections 6, 16, 31A, 48(1) and 48B; ;Constitution of India - Article 14

Advocate for Appellant : G. Purusothaman, Adv.

ORDERK. Chandru, J.1. In all these writ petitions the petitioners are residents of Ariyalur. Their lands were acquired on behalf of the Housing Board for the purpose of providing Neighborhood Housing Scheme.2. Though the petitioners earlier...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial