Advanced Search Results

M.K. Acharya, Additional District Magistrate Vs. Revashankar Narbadapr ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Contempt of Court

Acts : Contempt of Courts Act, 1952 - Sections 3

Reported in : AIR1959MP238; 1959CriLJ842

Advocate for Appellant : P.R. Sharma, Government Adv.

V.R. Nevaskar, J. 1. The facts giving rise to the present proceedings for contempt have been discussed in the judgment of this Court prior to remand by the Hon'ble the Supreme Court and in the judgment...

Court on Its Own Motion Vs. State and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Contempt of Court

Acts : Contempt of Courts Act, 1972 - Sections 2; Police and Criminal Evidence Act, 1984 - Sections 78; Representation of the People Act, 1951; Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Sections 2; Parliament Act; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 311; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 304 and 308; Evidence Act - Sections 7 and 8; Constitution of India - Articles 21 and 215

Reported in : 2009CriLJ677; 151(2008)DLT695; 2008(105)DRJ557

Advocate for Appellant : Arvind Nigam, Adv. and Amicus Curia; Sanjay Jain, Sr. Adv.,;

Madan B. Lokur, J.1. The question for our consideration is whether Mr. R.K. Anand and Mr. I.U. Khan, Senior Advocates and Mr. Sri Bhagwan Sharma, Advocate have committed criminal contempt of Court or not. We have...

Dr. Balmukund Prabhulal Parikh Vs. the Administrative Council of Mahar ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service

Reported in : (1996)98BOMLR994

K.G. Shah and N.D. Vyas, JJ.1. These two writ petitions are filed by the same petitioner. They involve common questions. Therefore, it will be convenient to dispose them of by this common judgment and they shall...

Shri Kanwal Malhotra Vs. the State

Court : Delhi

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 7, Rule 11; Limitation Act, 1963; Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 276

Reported in : AIR2006Delhi71; 125(2005)DLT281; 2005(85)DRJ598

Advocate for Appellant : Yasobant Das, Sr. Adv. and; Amrita Narayan, Adv

Badar Durrez Ahmed, J. 1. This is an application under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (herein after referred to as 'CPC'). The application has been filed on behalf of the...

Gurudas Mangruji Kamdi and Another Vs. The Hon’ble Chancellor of ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. B.G. Kulkarni, Mr. Kulkarni

B.R. Gavai, J. 1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent of learned counsel appearing for the parties. 2. An important question as to the scope of, powers of the Honble Chancellor to appoint...

Sanjeev Nanda Vs. the State

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 183, 184, 185, 185(1), 203 and 204; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 85, 201, 299, 299(3), 279, 300, 300(4), 302, 304, 304A, 311, 420 and 498A; Evidence Act - Sections 3, 6, 25, 27, 45, 74, 145 and 165; Road Safety Act, 1967 - Sections 1(1); Road Traffic Act, 1972 - Sections 6(1) and 10(2); Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 117; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 2, 36, 161, 161(3), 162, 162(1), 164, 165, 172(2), 173, 173(2), 173(8), 258, 309, 310, 311, 313, 340, 360 and 482; Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 - Sections 66; Immoral Traffic in Women and Girls Act, 1956; Probation of Offenders Act; Constitution of India - Articles 21, 39A, 136, 226 and 227; Bar Council of India Rules - Rules 16 and 252A

Reported in : 160(2009)DLT775

Advocate for Appellant : Ram Jethmalani and; Siddharth Luthra, Sr. Adv.,; R.N. Karan

Kailash Gambhir, J.The miracle is not to fly in air or to travel to the moon, but to walk on the earth', says a Chinese proverb.1. The increase in vehicular traffic alongwith the population of Delhi...

Dr. Bavaguthu Raghuram Shetty Vs. Bureau Of Immigration

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

- 1 - WP No.4385 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU R DATED THIS THE9H DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNA S DIXIT WRIT PETITION No.4385 OF2023(GM-RES) BETWEEN:...

Sudhakar Waman Chavan and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporations Act, 1949 - Sections 29A and 451; Constitution of India - Article 243S

Reported in : 2003(1)ALLMR527; 2003(4)BomCR239; 2003(1)MhLj631

Advocate for Appellant : P.M. Pradhan, ;S.S. Kulkarni, ;A.S. Oka and ;Rajesh S. Datar, Advs.;J.S. Pawar, AGP and ;R.S. Apte, Adv.

A. P. Shah, J. 1. Rule. Respondents waive service. By consent petitions are taken for final hearing.2. These writ petitions under Article 226 can be conveniently disposed of by a common order since they all pertain...

Sri Vikas Verma Vs. Union of India

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE08H DAY OF AUGUST2017BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAGHVENDRA S. CHAUHAN WRIT PETITION Nos.12681-12685/2016 C/W WRIT PETITION Nos.8694-8696/2016 (S-DIS) IN WRIT PETITION Nos.12681-12685/2016: BETWEEN :1....

Shrigonda Taluka Sakhar Kamgar Union and Others Vs. the State of Mahar ...

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

Subject : Land Acquisition

B.P. Dharmadhikari, J. 1. Heard learned respective Counsel for the parties. 2. Writ Petition No. 3694 of 2012 is filed by nine Trade Unions of workers claiming to represent 15,000 workers who work on land of...