Advanced Search Results

Prashant S/O. Arjunlal Jaiswal Vs. Pravinchand Masram (Deleted) State ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. L.H. Kothari, Mr. Kothari

Oral Judgment: Heard Mr. L.H. Kothari, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr A.V. Bhide, learned counsel for the respondent. 2. Respondent Pravinchand Masram is an accused in Summary Criminal Case No.217 of 2009 pending in...

Rajdhani Express and Transport Co. and ors. Vs. State of Raj. and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Sales Tax/VAT

Reported in : 1996WLC(Raj)UC517; 1995(2)WLN242

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Kothari

N.K. Jain, J.1. Since all the writ petitions raise a common question of law and fact they are being disposed of by this common order. Brief facts of said writ petitions are as follows:S.B. Writ Petition...

Charbhuja Sugar Works Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Sales Tax/VAT

Reported in : 2001(4)WLC395; 2007(2)WLN641

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Kothari

Rajesh Balia, J.1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.2. The petitioner challenges the order passed by the District Level Screening Committee (for short 'D.L.S.C.') dt. 30th October, 1991 as communicated vide letter dt. 31st October, 1991...

Kalawati Ramchand Malani Vs. Shankarrao Patil

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Reported in : (1974)76BOMLR718; 1974MhLJ908

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Kothari, Dr. Naik

Deshpande, J.1. Respondent No. 7, hereinafter referred to as 'the Society' defendant No. 3 is a Housing Society registered under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') as a tenant co partnership...

Jagat Explosives Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2007)212CTR(Raj)244

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Kothari

1. Heard the learned Counsel for the appellant.2. This appeal is directed against the order passed by the Tribunal, Jodhpur Bench, Jodhpur in IT Appeal No. 455/2000. The appellant assessee was a consignment agent for supply...

Pandurang Dhondu Bhuwad and Etc. Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1991(3)BomCR263; 1991CriLJ3177

Advocate for Appellant : R.P. Kadam and ;C.K. Talekar, Advs.

Saldanha, J.1. The four Appellants in this group of criminal appeals mere original Accused Nos. 2, 3, 4 and 5 in Sessions Case No. 28 of 1985 decided by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Bombay,...

Central Bank of India Vs. the Official Liquidator and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Company

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 39 and Order 40, Rule 1, 2 and Rule 1; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 446

Reported in : 1999(4)BomCR743

Advocate for Appellant : Sanjay Kothari,; Avinash Joshi i/b.; Mulla & ;Mulla;P.M. Pradhan, for ;Jalgaon Municipal Council;Ajay Panikar, ;Ms. Vidya Udas i/b. ;Haresh Mehta & Co., for workers;Mallapurkar, ;representativ

ORDERDr. PRATIBHA UPASANI, J.1. This Notice of Motion is taken out by the plaintiffs, praying that the Court Receiver, High Court, Bombay be directed to sell the immovable property described in Exhibit 'A-1' to the plaint...

Mozelle RobIn Solomon Vs. Lt. Col. R.J. Solomon

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Family

Reported in : (1979)81BOMLR578

Advocate for Appellant : Mrs. Nanavati

Madon, J.1. This is a suit brought with leave granted by the Court under Clause 12 of the Letters Patent by a wife against her husband and the woman with whom she alleges he has committed...

Hindustan Lever Ltd. and Another Vs. State of Maharashtra and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 - Sections 2(28) and 32; Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 - Sections 5(1); Haryana General Sales Tax Act, 1963 - Sections 9 and 9(1)

Reported in : (1990)92BOMLR480; (1990)ILLJ11bBom

Advocate for Appellant : T.R. Ahdhyarujina,;R.G. Sheth and;M.A. Desai, Advs., i/b.,;M/s. R.G. Sheth & Co.,;K.S. Cooper and;S.K. Copper, Advs., i/b.,;M/s. Kanga and Co.,;M.N. Kothari and;N.Z. Khapra, Advs.

S.P. Bharucha, J.1. These three writ petitions challenge the constitutionality of Maharashtra Ordinance No. 9 of 1989, and the Maharashtra Act No. 2 of 1990 which replaced it. They have been heard and can be disposed...

The State of Maharashtra Vs. Yeshwanta Pandu Bhavar

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1978)80BOMLR688

Vaidya, J.1. The above Second Appeal filed by the State of Maharashtra is directed against the judgment and decree passed by the learned Assistant Judge, Ahmednagar, dated April 6, 1971, confirming the decree passed by the...