Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: mr kothari · Page 1 of about 120 results (0.065 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 26 1991

Pandurang Dhondu Bhuwad and Etc. Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-26-1991

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1991(3)BomCR263; 1991CriLJ3177

Advocate for Appellant : R.P. Kadam and ;C.K. Talekar, Advs.

Saldanha, J.1. The four Appellants in this group of criminal appeals mere original Accused Nos. 2, 3, 4 and 5 in Sessions Case No. 28 of 1985 decided by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Bombay,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 16 1999

Central Bank of India Vs. the Official Liquidator and Others

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-16-1999

Subject : Company

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 39 and Order 40, Rule 1, 2 and Rule 1; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 446

Reported in : 1999(4)BomCR743

Advocate for Appellant : Sanjay Kothari,; Avinash Joshi i/b.; Mulla & ;Mulla;P.M. Pradhan, for ;Jalgaon Municipal Council;Ajay Panikar, ;Ms. Vidya Udas i/b. ;Haresh Mehta & Co., for workers;Mallapurkar, ;representativ

ORDERDr. PRATIBHA UPASANI, J.1. This Notice of Motion is taken out by the plaintiffs, praying that the Court Receiver, High Court, Bombay be directed to sell the immovable property described in Exhibit 'A-1' to the plaint...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 11 2003

Shriniwas S/O Mulchand Ladniya Vs. Laxminarayan S/O Jainarayan Rathi a ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-11-2003

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 397(2)

Reported in : 2003(2)ALD(Cri)93; I(2005)BC203; 2003BomCR(Cri)1469; 2003CriLJ3795; 2003(2)MhLj813

Advocate for Appellant : N.W. Kothari, Adv. holding for ;A.M. Ghare, Adv.

S.T. Kharche, J. 1. Rule taken up for final hearing with the consent of the parties.Heard Mr. Kothari, learned Advocate holding for Mr. A.M. Ghare, counsel for applicants, Mr. Paliwal, learned counsel for respondent No. 1...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 03 1968

Mozelle RobIn Solomon Vs. Lt. Col. R.J. Solomon

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-03-1968

Subject : Family

Reported in : (1979)81BOMLR578

Advocate for Appellant : Mrs. Nanavati

Madon, J.1. This is a suit brought with leave granted by the Court under Clause 12 of the Letters Patent by a wife against her husband and the woman with whom she alleges he has committed...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 15 1984

Prakash Waman Shinde Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-15-1984

Subject : CriminalMotor Vehicles

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 42, 445 and 446; Motor Vechicles Act, 1939 - Sections 128(2)

Reported in : 1984(1)BomCR573

Advocate for Appellant : S.R. Chitnis, Adv.

Sharad Manohar, J.1. These four petitions have been filed by one common petitioner Prakash Waman Shinde. His grievance is about the incident dated 22nd August, 1983 in which three police officers, that is to say, one...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 28 1990

Hindustan Lever Ltd. and Another Vs. State of Maharashtra and Others

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-28-1990

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 - Sections 2(28) and 32; Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 - Sections 5(1); Haryana General Sales Tax Act, 1963 - Sections 9 and 9(1)

Reported in : (1990)92BOMLR480; (1990)ILLJ11bBom

Advocate for Appellant : T.R. Ahdhyarujina,;R.G. Sheth and;M.A. Desai, Advs., i/b.,;M/s. R.G. Sheth & Co.,;K.S. Cooper and;S.K. Copper, Advs., i/b.,;M/s. Kanga and Co.,;M.N. Kothari and;N.Z. Khapra, Advs.

S.P. Bharucha, J.1. These three writ petitions challenge the constitutionality of Maharashtra Ordinance No. 9 of 1989, and the Maharashtra Act No. 2 of 1990 which replaced it. They have been heard and can be disposed...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 11 2006

Prakash S/O Vasudeo Tare Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-11-2006

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 - Sections 5(1), 5(2) and 6; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 197, 197(1), 239 and 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B and 409

Reported in : 2006(6)MhLj244

Advocate for Appellant : Mohan Sudame, Adv.

K.J. Rohee, J.1. By this petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the petitioner seeks to quash Criminal Case No. 17/1992 pending...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 05 1983

Dharamshi Polabhai Vs. Champaklal Vashram and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Apr-05-1983

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 99 - Order 1, Rule 10 - Order 32, Rules 1, 2, 2(2), 12, 12(4) and 14 - Order 33, Rule 11 - Order 44, Rule 1 - Rule 14

Reported in : AIR1983Guj217; (1983)2GLR1280

Advocate for Appellant : J.M. Thakore, Adv. General and; D.L. Kothari, Adv.

Majmudar, J. 1. The petitioner who is original responent 1 in the main first appeal and who was original defendant 1 in Special Civil Suit No. 37 of 1971 in the court of the learned Civil...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 10 2012

Prashant S/O. Arjunlal Jaiswal Vs. Pravinchand Masram (Deleted) State ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Decided on : Dec-10-2012

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. L.H. Kothari, Mr. Kothari

Oral Judgment: Heard Mr. L.H. Kothari, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr A.V. Bhide, learned counsel for the respondent. 2. Respondent Pravinchand Masram is an accused in Summary Criminal Case No.217 of 2009 pending in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 06 2016

Vishvash Machhinder Saptal Vs. The State of Union Territory through Da ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : May-06-2016

Subject : Criminal

A.M. Badar, J. 1. This is an appeal by the appellant / accused, who is convicted for an offence punishable under section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and sentenced to suffer Rigorous Imprisonment for...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial