Advanced Search Results

Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd Vs. Ms Subhiksha Trading Services.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Company

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Section 138; Companies Act, 1956. - Sections 433(e), (f),434 (i) (a), 439(1)(b), 237, 450(2),; Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860) - Section 195

Advocate for Appellant : Mr.H.Karthik Seshadri, Adv

Petition filed under Sections 433(e) & (f) r/w 434 (i) (a) and 439(1)(b) and 237 of the Companies Act, 1956 seeking to wind up the Respondent Company namely M/s Subhiksha Trading Services Limited uner the provisions...

Pal Singh vs State Nct of Delhi & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Rajat Kumar, Mr. Karthik

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 4807/2025 & CRL.M.A. 37011/2025 PAL SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajat Kumar and Mr. Karthik M, AdvocatesVersusSTATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr....

Amira Pure Foods Pvt Ltd vs.canara Bank & Ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Harish Malhotra, Mr. Ruchir Midha, Mr. Karthik K. R. Iggu Chiitio

$~43 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 8814/2018 & CM No.33880/2018 AMIRA PURE FOODS PVT LTD ........ Petitioner Through: Mr Harish Malhotra, Sr. Advocate with Mr Ruchir Midha, Mr Karthik...

Tvb Marketing India Pvt Ltd vs.itc Ltd

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Rajshekhar Rao, Mr. Varun Mishra, Mr. Karthik Sundar

* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:31. t July, 2019 CS(OS) 653/2015 TVB MARKETING INDIA PVT LTD ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Rajshekhar Rao, Mr. Varun Mishra & Mr....

P.Selvamani ... Vs. the Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation

Court : Chennai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution Of India - Article 226

Advocate for Appellant : Mr.Karthik, Adv.

1. The petitioner joined as Record Clerk in the respondent Corporation on 12.12.1979. The post of Record Clerk comes under Miscellaneous Group under the rules framed by the Board of the respondent Corporation. On completion of...

Satbir Singh Sawhney vs.phoenix Arc Private Limited

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Karthik K.R, Mr. Ruchin Midha

$~40 * + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI C.R.P. 172/2017 & CM No.28182/2017 (for condonation of 33 days delay in re-filing the petition) SATBIR SINGH SAWHNEY ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Karthik...

Vasudeva Jewellers (P) Ltd vs Kashish Rastogi

Court : Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Divyakant Lahoti, Mr. Karthik Lahoti

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CM(M) 521/2019, CM APPL. 15257/2019, CM APPL. 60342/2025 & CM APPL. 72113/2025 VASUDEVA JEWELLERS (P) LTD .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Divyakant Lahoti and Mr. Karthik Lahoti, Advocates.versusKASHISH...

M/S Tamil Nadu Waste Management Ltd. Vs.delhi State Industrial and Inf ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Raj Shekhar Rao, Mr. Matrugupta Mishra, Ms. Aastha Chawla, Mr. Karthik Sunder

$~52 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:19. 11.2018 + W.P.(C) 11544/2018 & CM Appl. Nos. 44676-44677/2018 M/S TAMIL NADU WASTE MANAGEMENT LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Raj Shekhar Rao, Mr....

K.Palani Vs The Secretary

Court : Chennai

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASRESERVED ON : 26.02.2026 DELIVERED ON : 13.03.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR W.P. Nos. 29670/2015, 15623 of 2019, 15973 of 2018, 16924 of 2019, 14887 of 2019 and 1857...

Chandran Ratnaswami Vs. K.C. Palanisamy and ors

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL/CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.__4540________OF 201.[Arising out of S.L.P.(C) No.13120 OF 2013]. CHANDRAN RATNASWAMI APPELLANT VERSUS K.C. PALANISAMY AND OTHERS RESPONDENTS WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NOs. 736-737 __________OF 201.(Arising...