Advanced Search Results

Sunil Kumar Kataria Vs. Suraksha Devi

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Sri. K.M. Garg, Ms. Manmeet Arora, Mr. Kapadia

B. Amit Sthalekar,J. This is a writ petition at the behest of the petitioner seeking quashing of the order dated 29.7.2013 passed by the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Prescribed Authority in P.A. Case No.06 of 2011,...

In Re: Pmp Auto Industries Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 10F, 17, 19, 43A, 391, 392, 393, 394, 394(1) and 394A

Reported in : 1991(4)BomCR387; [1994]80CompCas289(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Kapadia

B.N. Srikrishna, J.1. These three company petitions pertain to the sanctioning of schemes of amalgamation under which the PMP Auto Industries Ltd. (petitioners in Company Petition No. 428 of 1991) is to be amalgamated in the...

Usha Harshadkumar Dalal Vs. Manibhai Jhaverbhai Patel

Court : Mumbai

Subject : CivilTenancy

Reported in : 1997(4)ALLMR673; 1997(4)BomCR1; (1997)99BOMLR263

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Sathe, Mr. Kapadia

A.P. Shah, J.1. This chamber summons is taken out by the defendants Nos. 2, 7, 8, 11 and 13 to 26 to direct the respondents Nos. 1 to 3 to hand over possession of the premises...

Jai Krishan Basotra Vs. Santosh Gupta

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Subject : Tenancy

Reported in : 2008(3)JKJ306

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Kapadia

J.P. Singh, J.1. Petitioner is respondents tenant in respect of a shop located in the ground floor of a house situated opposite Peer Baba Apsra Road, Gandhi Nagar, Jammu. He has been contesting respondents suit seeking...

Indian Express News Papers Ltd. Vs. K. Karunakaran

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service

Reported in : (1979)81BOMLR297

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Kapadia, Mr. Manjil

Naik, J.1. This is an appeal by the original defendant No. 2 against the judgment and decree of the learned Judge of the City Civil Court, Bombay, dated January 27, 1975, in S.C. Suit No. 2329...

Shah Maheshchandra Gulabchand Vs. Regional Manager (S.D.R.), Bank of B ...

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Constitution

Reported in : (1996)2GLR458

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Kapadia

C.K. Thakker, J.1. By this petition, the petitioner wants this Court in exercise of extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution to quash, and set aside departmental proceedings initiated against him by the Bank of...

Adil Phiroz Makhania Vs. Dilip Gordhandas Gondalia and Another

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Kapadia, Mr. D'Mello, Mr. Kapdaia

Oral Judgment: 1. By this petition, the petitioner seeks revocation of the probate granted by this court in testamentary and intestate petition No. 701 of 2003 by its order dated 24th May, 2003. The petitioner claims...

Tata Capital Financial Services Limited Vs. Net 4 India Limited and Ot ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Kapadia

1. By this petition filed under section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 the petitioner seeks appointment of court receiver or some other fit and proper person as receiver of the equipments described in...

Vinayaka House Building Co -Op Society Vs. Sri. Chikka Thimmaiah

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Kapadia

R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE22D DAY OF APRIL, 2015 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MRS JUSTICE S SUJATHA Writ Petition Nos.22427-428/2010 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN VINAYAKA HOUSE BUILDING CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY NO.3, ADI CHUNCHAGIRI...

U.D. Patel and Co. Vs. C.M. Milligam and Clarke Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 115 and 151 - Order 39, Rule 2 - Order 41, Rule 23 - Order 43; Arbitration (Protocol and Convention) Act, 1937 - Sections 5, 7, 7(1) and 7(3); Indian Arbitration Act, 1940

Reported in : AIR1956Bom598

Advocate for Appellant : B.J. Kapadia, Adv., i/b., Hasan Baxi and Co., Attorneys

Gajendragadkar, J.1. This is an appeal by the plain-tiffs against the order passed by the learned Judge of the City Civil Court refusing to grant an injunction as prayed by them. It appears that between the...