Advanced Search Results
U.D. Patel and Co. Vs. C.M. Milligam and Clarke Ltd.
Mumbai
Dec-13-1955
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 115 and 151 - Order 39, Rule 2 - Order 41, Rule 23 - Order 43; Arbitration (Protocol and Convention) Act, 1937 - Sections 5, 7, 7(1) and 7(3); Indian Arbitration Act, 1940
AIR1956Bom598
B.J. Kapadia, Adv., i/b., Hasan Baxi and Co., Attorneys
Gajendragadkar, J.1. This is an appeal by the plain-tiffs against the order passed by the learned Judge of the City Civil Court refusing to grant an injunction as prayed by them. It appears that between the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBabubhai Gulambhai Goas Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.
Gujarat
Mar-30-1987
Criminal
(1987)2GLR814
S.B. Majmudar, J.1. In this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, the petitioner who is a detenu under the provisions of Section 3(1) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti-Social Activities Act, 1985 ('the RASA Act'...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskArvindbhai Jethabhai Parmar Vs. Comissioner of Police
Gujarat
Jul-22-2002
Criminal
Constitution of India - Articles 22(5) and 226; Gujarat Prevention of Anti-Social Activities Act, 1985 - Sections 2, 3 and 3(2); Bombay Prohibition Act - Sections. 66(1)(B), 65(E)(A) and 81
(2002)4GLR3537
N.M. Kapadia, Adv. for Petitioner No. 1
C.K. Buch, J.1. In this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India the petitioner-detenu has challenged the legality and validity of the detention order passed by the Police Commissioner, dated 10.4.2002 in exercise of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Hitachi Home and Life Solutions Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of I ...
SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT
Jul-06-2005
Land Acquisition
(2006)65SCL339SAT
2. The appellants are Hitachi Home & Life Solutions Inc. and Hitachi India Pvt. Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "Hitachi Group"). The appellants, being aggrieved by the order of the Whole Time Member of SEBI dated...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHousing Development and Infrastructure Limited Vs. Mumbai Internationa ...
Mumbai
Nov-28-2013
Land Acquisition
G.S. Patel, J. 1. This appeal is directed against an order dated 23rd August 2013 passed by a learned Single Judge of this Court dismissing the Appellants petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Association of the Traders carrying the Food Business of various F ...
Mumbai
Sep-16-2015
Land Acquisition
G.S. Kulkarni, J. 1. Admit. Respondents waive service. By consent of the learned Counsel for the parties and at their request taken up for final hearing. 2. This batch of petitions raise a common challenge. The...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSunil Kumar Kataria Vs. Suraksha Devi
Allahabad
Oct-11-2013
Land Acquisition
Sri. K.M. Garg, Ms. Manmeet Arora, Mr. Kapadia
B. Amit Sthalekar,J. This is a writ petition at the behest of the petitioner seeking quashing of the order dated 29.7.2013 passed by the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Prescribed Authority in P.A. Case No.06 of 2011,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCountry Club (India) Ltd. Vs. Choudhury and Choudhury (India) Ltd.
Mumbai
Oct-20-2016
Arbitration
1. By this petition filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short the said Act ), the petitioner has impugned the arbitral award dated 8th August 2012 made by the learned...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMurli Lekhraj, Sanwa Finance P. Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of I ...
SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT
Dec-14-2005
MRTP
(2006)68SCL29SAT
2. The appellants challenges the order passed by the Whole Time Member of SEBI dated 31st August, 2004 in this appeal. SEBI by exercising powers under Sections 11A and 11B of the SEBI Act, 1992 read...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShah Babulal Khimji Vs. Jayaben D. Kania and anr.
Supreme Court of India
Aug-10-1981
Civil
Companies Act - Sections 202; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 1, 2, 2(2), 2(9), 3, 4, 4(1), 5, 10, 16, 17, 20, 35A, 37, 47, 80, 91, 92, 95, 96 to 112, 116 to 120, 122, 125, 129, 144, 592 and 622 - Order 7, Rules 10 and 11 - Order 9, Rule 8 - Order 10, Rule 3 - Order 16, Rule 2 - Order 18, Rules 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, 15 and 16 - Order 20, Rules 1 to 8 - Order 38, Rules 2, 3 and 6 - Order 39, Rules 1, 2, 2A, 4 and 10 - Order 40, Rules 1 and 4 - Order 41, Rule 10 - Order 43, Rule 1 - Order 49, Rule 3; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1877 - Sections 588 to 591, 622; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1882 - Sections 588; Arbitration Act - Sections 39; Government of India Act - Sections 108; Indian High Courts Act, 1961 - Sections 13; Letters Patent Act, 1866; Code of Civil P
AIR1981SC1786; 1981(3)SCALE1169; (1981)4SCC8; [1982]1SCR187
Soli J. Sorabji,; G.L. Sanghi,; P.H. Parekh,;
Fazal Ali, J.1. This appeal by special leave is directed against an Order dated January 15, 1981 of the Division Bench of the Bombay High Court by which the appeal filed by the appellant against the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »