Advanced Search Results
Abdul Jamil and ors. Vs. Secretary, Income Tax Department and ors.
Chennai
Mar-26-1998
Direct Taxation
(1998)149CTR(Mad)270
V. Swaminathan, for the Assessee Mrs. Kala Ramesh, for the Revenue .
Jagadeesan, J.The unsuccessful plaintiffs are the appellants herein. They filed the suit OS 226/75 on the file of the sub-court, Dindigul for declaration that the purchase made by one Haft Mohammed Rahamathulla Rowther on 27-6-1968 from...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNational Insurance Co., Ltd., Vs. Sundar Raj and 2 Others
Chennai
Jan-07-2000
Motor Vehicles
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 -- Sections 96, 110-C(2), 166 and 168
I(2000)ACC452; 2001ACJ1685; 2000(1)CTC521
Mrs. Kala Ramesh, Adv.
ORDER1. The Insurance Company is the appellant, The appeal has been filed against the award passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Padmanabhapuram in M.C.O.P.No. 9 of 1989 on 31.3.1993 against the appellant/ Insurance Company.2. In...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskS. Subash Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax and anr.
Chennai
Nov-27-1998
Direct Taxation
[2000]248ITR512(Mad)
R. Janakiraman for the Assessee Mrs. Kala Ramesh for the Revenue
R. Jayasimha Babu, J.The petitioner is aggrieved by the order of the Commissioner declining to waive the interest for the period to 1984 and limiting the waiver for the subsequent period only to an extent of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Mangilal and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Rajasthan
Dec-08-1980
Constitution
1981WLN622
Mr. Kala
Lodha, J.1. These six writ petitions have been filed by the Railway empolyees. Since common questions of law have been raised in the writ petition's and argued, all these cases are being decided by one judgment,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskTamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Madurai Division Ii) Ltd., (Fo ...
Chennai
Apr-09-2007
Consumer
2007(5)CTC248
Kala Ramesh, Adv. in W.P. No. 17182 of 2000 and ;M. Ilango, Adv. in W.P.Nos. 8193 and 8194 of 2001
ORDERP.K. Misra, J.1. Heard Mrs. Kala Ramesh, learned Counsel for the petitioner in W.P. No. 17182 of 2000 and Mr. M. Ilango, learned Counsel for the petitioner in W.P.Nos. 8193 and 8194 of 2001, Mr. C....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGopal Prasad Varshney Vs. Bank of Rajasthan Ltd.
Rajasthan
Jan-10-2005
Service
Companies Act, 1956; Constitution of India - Articles 12 and 226; Employees Pension Regulations, 1993 - Regulation 26
RLW2005(2)Raj1351; 2005(2)WLC382
Party-in-Person
Ashok Parihar, J.1. Petitioner was appointed on the post of Clerk in the respondent-Bank on 23.1.1965 after giving age relaxation of two and a half years in view of his additional qualifications. The petitioner retired from...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSmt. Pushpa Devi Vs. Kishanlal
Rajasthan
Sep-04-1981
Family
1981WLN(UC)304
Mr. S.S. Purohit
S.K. Mal Lodha, J.1. This is an appeal by mother of' the minor Om Prakash under Section 47 of the Guardian and Wards Act (No. viii of 1890) (for short 'the Act') against the order dated...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUnion Bank Employees Association Vs. Union Bank of India
Rajasthan
Aug-06-2001
Labour and Industrial
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 25H
[2003(96)FLR48]; 2002(4)WLC441
Rajendra Soni, Adv.
Keshote, J.1. Challenge has been made to the award dated 20. 4. 2001 of the Central Industrial Tribunal, Jaipur in case No. C. I. T. 86/89 by the petitioners in this petition under Article 227 of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPoonam Talkies Vs. Presiding Officer, Labour Court
Rajasthan
Jun-09-1986
Labour and Industrial
1986(2)WLN255
Mr. Kala
Narendera Mohan Kasliwal, J.1. M/s Poonam Talkies, Dausa (here in after referred to as the petitioner) has filed this writ petition on the allegation that on 18th November, 1978, some supporters of Cinema Karamachari Union started...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskParmeshwar Lal Vs. the State of Rajasthan and 14 ors.
Rajasthan
Apr-29-1981
Service
1981WLN178
G.M. Lodha, J.1. These 23 writ petitions have been filed by the employees of the State of Rajasthan against the order of their termination. All these employees were appointed on temporary basis. Their services have been...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- Next ›
- Last »