Advanced Search Results
i.T.C. Limited Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.
Chennai
Jan-20-2004
Excise
Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 57G(2); Constitution of India - Article 14
2004(93)ECC569
Sriram Panchu, Senior counsel for ;T. Mohan, Adv.
ORDERP. Sathasivam, J.1. I.T.C. Limited has filed the above writ petition for declaration, declaring Second Proviso to Rule 57G(2) of the Central Excise Rules inserted by M.F. (D.R.) Notification No. 28/95-CE (NT) dated 29.6.95 as ultra...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMadras Steel Re-rollers Association Vs. Union of India (Uoi)
Chennai
Sep-29-2000
Excise
Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 3A, 3A(2) and 37; Central Excise Tariff Act; Finance Act, 1997 - Sections 81; Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 - Sections 45S; Hot Re-rolling Steel Mills Annual Capacity Determination (Amendment) Rules, 1997 - Rules 3, 3(5), 5 and 5(3); Central Excise Rules
2001(129)ELT316(Mad)
A.L. Somayaji, ;C. Natarajan and ;Arvind P. Dattar, Sr. Counsels and ;Pushpa Seetharaman, ld. Counsel
ORDERP. Sathasivam, J.1. W.P. No. 14672/97 is filed by Madras Steel Re-rollers Association. Other writ petitions are filed by individual companies. Both the Steel Re-rollers Association and the individual companies have approached this Court to issue...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSri Pandyan Travels, Represented by K. Devendran Vs. Commissioner of C ...
Chennai
Aug-22-2003
Service Tax
Constitution of India - Article 226
(2004)186CTR(Mad)677; 2004(91)ECC369; 2003LC654(Madras); 2004(163)ELT409(Mad); [2004]268ITR391(Mad); 2006[3]STR151; [2007]7STT159
Radha Gopalan, Adv.
ORDERP. Sathasivam, J.1. By consent of both parties main writ petition itself is taken up for disposal. Questioning the order of the Commissioner of Central Excise, Service Tax Cell, Chennai II, Chennai-35, made in C.No.IV/16/368/2001-STC dated...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Commissioner of Customs (Sea Port) Vs. Registrar, Office of C and Ce a ...
Chennai
Sep-10-2003
Customs
Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 28AA, 28(2) and 127B
2004(91)ECC359; 2004(164)ELT412(Mad)
K. Veeraraghavan, Sr. Central Government Standing Counsel
ORDERP. Sathasivam, J. 1. By consent of both parties main writ petition itself is taken up for disposal. Aggrieved by the Final Order No. 2/2002 dt 28.5.2002 passed by the Settlement Commission, Additional Bench, Office of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCc (Sea Port) Vs. S.R.F. Ltd.
Chennai
Oct-09-2003
Customs
2004(113)LC218(Madras)
ORDERP. Sathasivam, J.1. By consent of both parties main writ petition itself is taken up for disposal. Aggrieved by the final order No. 2/2002, dated 28.5.2002 : 2003 (158) ELT 788 (Sett. Comm.) passed by the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCc (Sea Port) Vs. Settlement Commission S.R.F. Ltd.
Chennai
Sep-10-2003
Customs
2003(111)LC531(Madras)
ORDERP. Sathasivam, J.1. By consent of both parties main writ petition itself is taken up for disposal. Aggrieved by the Final Order No. 2/2002 dated 28.5.2002 reported in 2003 (58) RLT 1045 (SET. COM) passed by...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskLarsen and Toubro Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)
Chennai
Sep-13-2002
Excise
Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 37B and 55A; Constitution of India - Article 265; Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Finance Act, 1997
2006(198)ELT177(Mad)
Arvind P. Datar, SC
ORDERE. Padmanabhan, J.1. The petitioner prays for the issue of a writ of declaration to declare the impugned circular of the 2nd respondent in No. 315/31/97-CX., dated 23-5-97 as ultra vires of Sections 55-A and 37-B...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCce Vs. Sail
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Jul-27-2001
Service Tax
(2000)LC129Tri(Chennai)
1. The matter has been listed for passing final order in terms of Section 35K read with 35C of the Central Excise Act.2. The Collector of Central Excise, Coimbatore was aggrieved with the Order-in-Appeal No. 249/87...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskTanfac Industries Ltd., Rep. by M.H. Upadhyaya, Joint President Vs. Mo ...
Chennai
Feb-05-2003
Customs
Constitution of India - Article 226
2003(155)ELT251(Mad)
Arvind P. Datar, SC
ORDERE. Padmanabhan, J.1. In W.P. No. 13045/99, the writ petitioner M/s. TANFAC Industries Ltd., has prayed for the issue of a writ of certiorari to call for and quash the proceedings of the first respondent, Monopolies...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Central Excise Vs. Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) ...
Chennai
Feb-24-2005
Excise
Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 35H(1)
2006(202)ELT758(Mad)
K. Veeraraghavan, Addl. Central Government Standing Counsel
Markandey Katju, C.J.1. This is a reference application under Section 35H(1) of the Central Excise Act, by which the following question is sought to be referred to us for our opinion:-'Whether the Tribunal was right in...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »