Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: mr k v singh · Page 1 of about 11 results (0.412 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 30 2019

Royale India Rail Tours Ltd. Vs.cox & Kings India Ltd. & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-30-2019

Subject : Arbitration

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:25. 10.2018 Date of decision :30. 01.2019 ARB. A. (COMM.) 11/2018 ARB. A. (COMM.) 12/2018 ROYALE INDIA RAIL TOURS LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Abhinav Vasisht,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 30 2019

Cox and Kings India Ltd. Vs.indian Railway Catering and Tourism Corpor ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-30-2019

Subject : Arbitration

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:25. 10.2018 Date of decision :30. 01.2019 + ARB. A. (COMM.) 13/2018 & IA35872018 COX AND KINGS INDIA LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Rajiv Nayar, Sr....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 04 2013

Present: Mr.K.V. Singh Advocate for Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Mar-04-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

Crl. Misc. not M-4913 of 2012(O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.Misc.not M- 4913 of 2012 Date of decision :04. 03.2013 Harjinder Singh alias Soni ....Petitioner versus State of Punjab...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

May 28 2015

Vil Limited Vs. National Highways Authority of India

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-28-2015

Subject : Land Acquisition

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment decided on May 28, 2015 + OMP (I) 267/2015 VIL LIMITED Through: ..... Petitioner Mr.K.V.Singh, Adv. with Mr.Nachiketa Goyal, Mr.Rishabh Arora, Advs. versus NATIONAL HIGHWAYS...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 19 2013

Crl.Misc.No.M-32092 of 2012 (Oandm) Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Mar-19-2013

Subject : Education

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.Misc.not M-32092 of 2012 (O&M) Date of decision:19. 03.2013 Prem Bai ..Petitioner Versus State of Punjab ..Respondent Crl.Misc.not M-41273 of 2012 (O&M) Date of decision:19. 03.2013...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 19 2012

Present: Mr. K.V.Singh Ahluwalia Advocate Vs. State of Haryana

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Nov-19-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

Crl. Revision No.2610 of 2012 (O&M) -1- In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh Crl. Revision No.2610 of 2012 (O&M) Date of Decision:19. 11.2012. Jai Karan .......Petitioner Versus State of Haryana .......Respondent CORAM:...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 12 2003

Ansal theatres and Clubotels Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State and anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-12-2003

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Cinematograph Act; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 310 and 457

Reported in : 2003CriLJ4724; 107(2003)DLT85; 2003(71)DRJ66; 2003(3)JCC1477

Advocate for Appellant : Ram Jethmalani, Sr. Adv., ; R.S. Suri,; J.S. Chhabra,;

J.D. Kapoor, J. 1. Petitioners are owners of Uphaar Cinema which witnessed dance of death on 13.6.1997 when hundreds of people who had gone to see first show of the movie released on that day were...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 26 1980

Brig. B. Lall Vs. Wealth-tax Officer, A-ward and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Feb-26-1980

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Wealth Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 16A, 16A(1), 16A(6) and 17(1)

Reported in : (1980)15CTR(Raj)180; [1981]127ITR308(Raj)

Advocate for Appellant : L.R. Mehta and; Rajendra Mehta, Advs.

G.M. Lodha, J.1. Evasion, avoidance or tax dodging has always posed a perennial problem for the revenue. The Direct Taxation Enquiry Committee, headed by Chief Justice K. N. Wanchoo, suggested latest ways andmethods, to plug loopholes...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 13 2011

Municipal Corporation of Delhi Vs. Association of Victims of Uphaar Tr ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-13-2011

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 21, 32, 226; Cinematograph Act; Delhi Cinematograph Rules, 1953; Human Rights Act, 1998

Reported in : 2011(4)KLT137(SN)(C.No.147); 2011AIRSCW6418; 2012(1)LW593; AIR2012SC100; 2012(2)SCJ751

1. These appeals are filed against the judgment dated 24.4.2003 of a division bench of the Delhi High Court in the Uphaar Cinema tragedy. CA No.7114-15/2003 is by the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (for short `MCD')....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 15 2026

Koraishi Bibi vs State Govt of Nct of Delhi

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-15-2026

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Saurabh Kumar, Ms. Neelam Yadav, Mr. K.V. Singh

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 4568/2025, CRL.M.A. 35261/2025 KORAISHI BIBI .....Applicant Through: Mr. Saurabh Kumar, Ms. Neelam Yadav and Mr. K.V. Singh, Advocates.versusSTATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial