Advanced Search Results
Royale India Rail Tours Ltd. Vs.cox & Kings India Ltd. & Anr.
Delhi
Jan-30-2019
Arbitration
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:25. 10.2018 Date of decision :30. 01.2019 ARB. A. (COMM.) 11/2018 ARB. A. (COMM.) 12/2018 ROYALE INDIA RAIL TOURS LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Abhinav Vasisht,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCox and Kings India Ltd. Vs.indian Railway Catering and Tourism Corpor ...
Delhi
Jan-30-2019
Arbitration
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:25. 10.2018 Date of decision :30. 01.2019 + ARB. A. (COMM.) 13/2018 & IA35872018 COX AND KINGS INDIA LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Rajiv Nayar, Sr....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPresent: Mr.K.V. Singh Advocate for Vs. State of Punjab
Punjab and Haryana
Mar-04-2013
Land Acquisition
Crl. Misc. not M-4913 of 2012(O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.Misc.not M- 4913 of 2012 Date of decision :04. 03.2013 Harjinder Singh alias Soni ....Petitioner versus State of Punjab...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Vil Limited Vs. National Highways Authority of India
Delhi
May-28-2015
Land Acquisition
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment decided on May 28, 2015 + OMP (I) 267/2015 VIL LIMITED Through: ..... Petitioner Mr.K.V.Singh, Adv. with Mr.Nachiketa Goyal, Mr.Rishabh Arora, Advs. versus NATIONAL HIGHWAYS...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCrl.Misc.No.M-32092 of 2012 (Oandm) Vs. State of Punjab
Punjab and Haryana
Mar-19-2013
Education
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.Misc.not M-32092 of 2012 (O&M) Date of decision:19. 03.2013 Prem Bai ..Petitioner Versus State of Punjab ..Respondent Crl.Misc.not M-41273 of 2012 (O&M) Date of decision:19. 03.2013...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPresent: Mr. K.V.Singh Ahluwalia Advocate Vs. State of Haryana
Punjab and Haryana
Nov-19-2012
Land Acquisition
Crl. Revision No.2610 of 2012 (O&M) -1- In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh Crl. Revision No.2610 of 2012 (O&M) Date of Decision:19. 11.2012. Jai Karan .......Petitioner Versus State of Haryana .......Respondent CORAM:...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAnsal theatres and Clubotels Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State and anr.
Delhi
Sep-12-2003
Criminal
Cinematograph Act; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 310 and 457
2003CriLJ4724; 107(2003)DLT85; 2003(71)DRJ66; 2003(3)JCC1477
Ram Jethmalani, Sr. Adv., ; R.S. Suri,; J.S. Chhabra,;
J.D. Kapoor, J. 1. Petitioners are owners of Uphaar Cinema which witnessed dance of death on 13.6.1997 when hundreds of people who had gone to see first show of the movie released on that day were...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBrig. B. Lall Vs. Wealth-tax Officer, A-ward and anr.
Rajasthan
Feb-26-1980
Direct Taxation
Wealth Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 16A, 16A(1), 16A(6) and 17(1)
(1980)15CTR(Raj)180; [1981]127ITR308(Raj)
L.R. Mehta and; Rajendra Mehta, Advs.
G.M. Lodha, J.1. Evasion, avoidance or tax dodging has always posed a perennial problem for the revenue. The Direct Taxation Enquiry Committee, headed by Chief Justice K. N. Wanchoo, suggested latest ways andmethods, to plug loopholes...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMunicipal Corporation of Delhi Vs. Association of Victims of Uphaar Tr ...
Supreme Court of India
Oct-13-2011
Constitution
Constitution of India - Articles 21, 32, 226; Cinematograph Act; Delhi Cinematograph Rules, 1953; Human Rights Act, 1998
2011(4)KLT137(SN)(C.No.147); 2011AIRSCW6418; 2012(1)LW593; AIR2012SC100; 2012(2)SCJ751
1. These appeals are filed against the judgment dated 24.4.2003 of a division bench of the Delhi High Court in the Uphaar Cinema tragedy. CA No.7114-15/2003 is by the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (for short `MCD')....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKoraishi Bibi vs State Govt of Nct of Delhi
Delhi
Apr-15-2026
Land Acquisition
Mr. Saurabh Kumar, Ms. Neelam Yadav, Mr. K.V. Singh
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 4568/2025, CRL.M.A. 35261/2025 KORAISHI BIBI .....Applicant Through: Mr. Saurabh Kumar, Ms. Neelam Yadav and Mr. K.V. Singh, Advocates.versusSTATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »