Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: mr k ram kumar and · Page 1 of about 14 results (0.237 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 04 1998

Bhadrachalam Paperboards Ltd. and anr. Vs. the Government of Andhra Pr ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-04-1998

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR1998SC2634; 1998LC193(SC); 1999(106)ELT290(SC); JT1998(5)SC314; 1998(4)SCALE368; (1998)6SCC250; [1998]3SCR968; [1998]111STC657(SC)

K. Venkataswami, J.1. The appellants moved the High Court of Andhra Pradesh under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the respondents in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 08 2003

V. Dandapani Chettiar Vs. Balasubramanian Chettiar (Dead) by Lrs. and ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-08-2003

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Sections 15, 15(1), 15(2) and 16

Reported in : 2003(5)ALD77(SC); 2004(5)ALLMR(SC)171; 2003(3)BLJR1980; 2003(4)CTC122; [2003(4)JCR135(SC)]; JT2003(3)SC81; 2003(4)MhLj1; (2004)1MLJ14(SC); 2003MPLJ546(SC); 2003(6)SCALE167;

Advocate for Appellant : K. Ram Kumar and; B. Sridhar Reddy, Advs

Ar. Lakshmanan, J. 1. The unsuccessful plaintiff who lost his case in all the three Courts is the appellant in this appeal. The appellant (Dandapani Chettiar) filed O.S. No. 300 of 1974 in the Court of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 03 1994

Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Vs. Raja D.V. Appa Rao Bahadur

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-03-1994

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : 1995Supp(3)SCC397

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Bhatt

ORDER  1. We have heard both the learned counsel at length.  2. We are clearly of the opinion that the judgment under appeal cannot be supported in law. For arriving at this decision, a few facts...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jan 06 2010

K. Unnikrishna Pillai, Radio Fitter (Highly Skilled) Vs. Commodore, Ch ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ernakulam

Decided on : Jan-06-2010

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : For the Applicant: Mr. O.V. Radhakrishnan Sr. with Mr. C.S.G. Nair, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Sunil Jacob Jose, SCGSC.

HON'BLE Dr. K.B.S. RAJAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER These O.As, having one common legal point to be decided, have been clubbed together, heard together and a common order is passed. For the purpose of reference, requisite details as...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 18 1997

Polammarasetti Varana Venka Satyanarayana Vs. Suddha Apparao Naidu (De ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-18-1997

Subject : Property

Reported in : AIR1997SC2127; JT1997(4)SC327; RLW1997(1)SC170; 1997(3)SCALE193; (1997)9SCC244; [1997]3SCR29

Advocate for Appellant : K. Ram Kumar, C. Balasubramaniam, Y. Subba Rao and Ms. Asha Nair, Advs

G.N. Ray and G.T. Nanavati, JJ.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment of the Andhra Pradesh High Court dated April 16, 1987, passed in Second Appeal No. 308 of 1981. By the impugned judgment, the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 10 1991

Murugayya Udayar and anr. Vs. Kothampatti Muniyandavar Temple by Trust ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-10-1991

Subject : Property

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 100

Reported in : JT1991(5)SC130; 1991(1)SCALE112; 1991Supp(1)SCC331; 1991(1)LC486(SC)

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. K. Ram Kumar

Madan Mohan Punchhi, J.1. This appeal by special leave is directed against the judgment and decree of the High Court of Madras in Second Appeal No. 2170/1972, upsetting the concurrent judgment of the courts below. 2....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 12 1996

Ramanuja Naidu Vs. V. Kanniah Naidu and Anothers

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jun-12-1996

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 100

Reported in : AIR1996SC3021; JT1996(3)SC164; (1996)2MLJ44(SC); 1996(2)SCALE718; (1996)3SCC392; [1996]3SCR239; 1996(2)LC70(SC)

Advocate for Appellant : A.T.M. Sampath, Adv

ORDER1. The first defendant in O.S. 329 of 1967, Munsiff Court, Thirukoilur, has filed this appeal against the judgment of a learned single judge of the Madras High Court rendered in S.A. No. 93 of 1974...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 01 1996

Shri Mhaliamman Temple and Vigneswarar Koil Vs. Vlijayammal (Dead) by ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-01-1996

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Sections 14

Reported in : AIR1996SC3189A; 1996(1)LC556(SC)

Advocate for Appellant : Shri A.T.M. Sampath, Adv

ORDERK.S. Paripoornan, J.1. The first defendant in O.S. No. 344 of 1967. Subordinate Judge's court, Coimbatore, is the appellant herein. The plaintiff in the said suit is the respondent. The suit was laid for a declaration...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 31 2001

A.P. State Federation of Coop. Spinning Mills Ltd. and anr. Vs. P.V. S ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-31-2001

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution Of India - Article 226

Reported in : [2001(89)FLR332]; JT2001(3)SC530; (2001)ILLJ1341SC; (2001)10SCC83

G.B. Pattanaik and; B.N. Agrawal, JJ.1. The respondent had been appointed as General Manager (Finance) under Andhra Pradesh State Federation of Cooperative Spinning Mills Ltd. for a period of 3 years with effect from 6-8-1991. While...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 01 1996

Sri Mahaliamman Temple and Vigneswarar Koil Represented by Its Trustee ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-01-1996

Subject : Property

Acts : Hindu Succession Act, 1956

Reported in : AIR1996SC3189; JT1996(3)SC127; 1996(2)SCALE617; (1996)8SCC7

Paripoornan, J.1. The first defendant in O. S. No. 344 of 1967, Subordinate Judge's Court, Coimbatore, is the appellant herein. The plaintiff in the said suit is the respondent. The suit was laid for a declaration...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial