Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: mr jayant bhushan · Page 1 of about 354 results (0.111 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 27 2011

Association of Radio and Television Engineering Employees and ors. Vs. ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-27-2011

Subject : Civil

Acts : Central Civil Services (Recognition of Service Association) Rules 1959; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Section 3(42)

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Jayant Bhushan; Mr. Sanjai Pathak; Mr. Gautam Talukdar, Advs.

1. An interesting question of law concerning the interpretation of the expression "service matters" defined in Section 3(q) of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 („ATA) arises for consideration in this petition. 2. The Association of Radio...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 28 2010

Ashapura Minechem Ltd. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Oct-28-2010

Subject : Mines and Minerals

Acts : Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 - Sections 11(2) ,11(3) ,11(4) , 30, 6

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Jayant Bhushan ; Mr. Akshay Ringe ; Mr. Nikhil Rohatgi, Advs.

1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? Yes3. Whether the judgment should be reported in Digest? Yes 1. The challenge in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 03 2011

Creative Home Fashions Limited Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-03-2011

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226, 14; Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act (SARFAESI), 2002 - Section 17(2); Income-tax Act, 1961 - Section 72A

Advocate for Appellant : Mr.Jayant Bhushan; Mr.Aditya Tiwari, Advs.

1. Whether reporters of the local papers be allowed to see the judgment? Yes2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? Yes3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Yes1. By this writ...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

May 03 1999

Mamta Sharma Vs. University of Delhi

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-03-1999

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1999IIIAD(Delhi)774; 79(1999)DLT612; 1999(50)DRJ567

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Jayant Bhushan, Adv

ORDERK. Ramamoorthy, J.1. The facts necessary for the disposal of the writ petition could be narrated thus: The second respondent college, issued an advertisement in 'The Hindustan Times' on the 27th of August, 1996 calling for...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 13 2001

The Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs and ors. Vs. Ex-subedar Ansuya ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-13-2001

Subject : Service

Acts : Central Reserve Police Force Rules - Rules 7(B), 27 and 28; Central Reserve Police Force Act - Sections 3, 14(3) and 27; Constitution of India - Article 311 and 311(1); Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 240(3)

Reported in : 94(2001)DLT611; 2002(61)DRJ109

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Jayant Bhushan, Adv

ORDERDalveer Bhandari, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment of the learned Single Judge dated 15.9.1995.2. Brief facts which are necessary to dispose of this appeal are recapitulated as under:The respondent/writ petitioner was appointed as...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 31 2010

Mohit Kumar..Vs. Himalayan Institute Hospital Trust.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-31-2010

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Jayant Bhushan,Adv.

1. Whether Reporters of local papers may beallowed to see the judgment? No2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? Yes3. Whether the judgment should be reported in Digest? Yes 1. The Petitioner has challenged...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 01 1997

Baljit Singh Vs. Delhi Administration and anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-01-1997

Subject : Property

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1998IAD(Delhi)852; 69(1997)DLT1022

Advocate for Appellant : Mukul Rohatagi,; R.K. Saini,; Jayant Bhushan and;

K. Ramamoorthy, J. (1) The petitioner has prayed for the issuance of writ of certiorari for quashing the letter dated 20.10.1982 by Delhi Administration and the letter dated 25.11.1982 by the Delhi Development Authority (hereinafter referred...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 26 2018

Justice k.s.puttaswamy(retd) Vs. Union of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-26-2018

Subject : Right to Information

Advocate for Appellant : Anish Kumar Gupta

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.494 OF2012JUSTICE K.S. PUTTASWAMY (RETD.) AND ANOTHER .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS .....RESPONDENT(S) WITH TRANSFERRED CASE (CIVIL) No.151 OF2013TRANSFERRED CASE (CIVIL)...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 01 2017

Housing and Urban Development Corp Ltd (Hudco) vs.k M Realcon Pvt Ltd ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-01-2017

Subject : Land Acquisition

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: February 01,2017 + LPA2212016 & CM Nos.12231, 12232/2016 HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD (HUDCO) Versus SGS CONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPERS PVT LTD &...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 01 2017

Housing and Urban Development Corporation Ltd (Hudco) vs.sgs Construct ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-01-2017

Subject : Land Acquisition

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: February 01,2017 + LPA2212016 & CM Nos.12231, 12232/2016 HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD (HUDCO) Versus SGS CONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPERS PVT LTD &...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial