Advanced Search Results

A. Ramloo and ors. Vs. G. Sreeramachandra Murthy and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : CivilProperty

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 99 - Order 1, Rules 1, 3, and 10 - Order 2, Rule 6 - Order 22, Rules 3 and 9; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 68, 101 and 103

Reported in : 1999(2)ALD590; 1999(2)ALT624

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. J. Prabhakar, Adv.

1. This appeal is filed by the defendants 1 to 3 and 5. The 4th defendant died during the pendency of the suit. The said defendant was given up by the plaintiffs on the ground that...

K. Kamala Devi Vs. Kammala Kumara Sekhar and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : FamilyCriminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 125; Hindu Marriage Act

Reported in : II(1993)DMC468

Advocate for Appellant : G. Rohini, Adv.

Subhashan Reddy, J.1. This is a rather unusual and peculiar case arising under Section 125 Cr. P.C. where the first respondent eventhough denied his paternity to the petitioner herein, contended that he did not father her,...

K. Kamaladevi Vs. Kammala Kumara Sekhar and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : FamilyCriminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 125

Reported in : I(1994)DMC183

Advocate for Appellant : G. Rohini, Adv.

Subhashan Reddy, J.This is a rather unusual and peculiar case arising under Section 125 Cr.P.C. where the first respondent eventhough denied his paternity to the petitioner herein, contended that he did not father her, has instituted...

Sri M/S. Ajit Exports,a Partnership Firm Vs. M/S.Mbs Impex Privatelimi ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Land Acquisition

THE HONOURABLE Sr.JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY COMPANY PETITION No.180 of 2011 12-02-2014 Sr.M/S.Ajit Exports,A partnership firm having its office at 93, Mangolpur Khurd, New Delhi-100083,Rep., by its Partner Sh. Ajit Singh ..Petitioner M/s.MBS Impex Private Limited,Having its...

Giridhari Auto Finance Private Limited Vs. Gudla Hari Babu and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 148 and 149 - Order 7, Rule 11; Court Fee Act

Reported in : 2003(6)ALD682; II(2004)BC582

Advocate for Appellant : J. Prabhakar, Adv.

ORDERGopala Krishna Tamada, J.1. The plaintiff-petitioner herein has preferred the above two CRPs., against the common order passed in IA Nos. 1217 of 2001 and 1218 of 2002 in an unnumbered Original Suit, on 7-8-2002 by...

K.R. Krishna Murthy Vs. Hyderabad Allwyn Ltd.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Property

Acts : Andhra Pradesh, Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1960; Transfer of Property Act - Sections 44, 106, 109 and 111; Indian Easements Act, 1882 - Sections 35 and 62; Indian Stamp Act - Sections 35; Registration Act - Sections 49; Rent Control Act; Bombay Rent Act - Sections 5(4A), 15A and 15A(1); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 7, Rule 9 - Order 41, Rule 27

Reported in : 2006(2)ALD486; 2006(3)ALT50

Advocate for Appellant : J. Prabhakar, ;M.S. Ramachandra Raa, ;K. Sankariah, ;M.V.S. Suresh Kumar and ;Y. Rainakar, Advs. for Appearing Parties

A. Gopal Reddy, J.1. The defendant in the Court below filed this appeal against the judgment and decree of the I Additional Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad dated 29-7-1987 passed in O.S. No. 712 of 1980,...

Dist. Collector and ors. Vs. Harikishan Agarwal and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 - Sections 4(1), 8(1) and 8(3); ;Andhra Pradesh Record of Rights in Lands and Pattedar Passbooks (Amendment) Act, 1989 - Sections 4; Andhra Pradesh Record of Rights and Pattedar Passbooks Act, 1971 - Sections 5, 5A, 6, 6(1), 6A(5) and 7; ;Andhra Pradesh Record of Rights in Lands and Pattedar Passbooks Rules, 1989 - Rule 9 and 9(1)

Reported in : 2001(6)ALT397

Advocate for Appellant : G.P. for Revenue

S.B. Sinha, C.J.1. The question, which arises for consideration, in this writ appeal is as to whether a Pattedar Passbook and Record of Rights Passbook can be issued during the pendency of a proceeding under the...

Velama Aruna Vs. Gadde Chakrapani

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. J. Prabhakar

This civil revision petition arises out of order dt.01.10.2015 in O.S. No.298 of 2012 on the file of the II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Guntur. Shorn of unnecessary facts, the only point arises for consideration...

B. Joseph and Two ors. Vs. Rustrom Gew Irani

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 39 Rule 1; Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 - Sections 26(1)

Reported in : 2003(6)ALD3; 2003(3)ALT589

Advocate for Appellant : Koka Raghava Rao

ORDERC.Y. Somayajulu, J.1. Since both these revisions arise out of a common order, they are being disposed of by this common order.2. C.R.P. No. 5733 of 2002 arises out of C.M.A. No. 71 of 2001, which...

P. Venkateswarlu Vs. Govt. of Andhra Pradesh and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Housing Board Act, 1956 - Sections 3, 3(1), 21, 22, 22-A, 23, 23(1), 26, 27, 32, 34 and 36; Andhra Pradesh Urban Areas (Development) Act, 1975 - Sections 2, 3, 6, 7, 7(2), 11, 11(1), 11(2), 12, 12(1), 13, 13(1), 13(4), 13(5), 13(7), 14, 14(1), 15, 57, 58(1) and 59(1); Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act, 1955 - Sections 586; Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4, 4(1), 40, 40-A, 40-B and 40-C; Andhra Pradesh Housing Schemes (Acquisition of Land) Act, 1961 - Sections 4; Andhra Pradesh (Andhra Area) Town Planning Act, 1920; Andhra Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1965; Andhra Pradesh Slum Improvement (Acquisition of Land) Act, 1956 - Sections 42(6), 43(1) and 43(7); Urban Development Authority (Hyderabad) Rules, 1977 - Rule 13 and 13-A; Sick Industries Companies (Special P

Reported in : 2001(6)ALD533; 2002(2)ALT791

Advocate for Appellant : N. Subba Reddy for M.S. Ramachandra Rao, Adv. and ;Kalyan Ram Krishna, Adv.

S.B. Sinha, C.J. 1. These writ petitions involving common questions of fact and law were heard together and are being disposed of by this common judgment. 2. The controversy in these writ petitions centers around the...