Advanced Search Results

Raju Alias Rajendra, and anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 307, 302, 34, 149, 325, 324, 148, 141, 143

Reported in : 2013(2)SCC233; 2013(1)KCCR609; AIR2013SCW812

Ranjan Gogoi, J.1. Being directed against the common judgment dated 16th March, 2007 passed by the High Court of Rajasthan we had heard both the appeals analogously and the same are being disposed of by this...

Raju @ Rajendra and anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1915 OF 200.Raju @ Rajendra & Anr. ... Appellant(s) Versus State of Rajasthan ... Respondent(s) WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1897 OF 200.JUDGMENT RANJAN GOGOI, J.Being...

Raghunath and Ram Kishan and ors. Vs. State of Haryana and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 148, 149, 161, 302, 323, 325, 427, 436 and 452

Reported in : AIR2003SC165; (2003)2CALLT41(SC); 2003CriLJ401; JT2002(9)SC556; (2003)1SCC398

Advocate for Appellant : K.T.S. Tulsi,; Sushil Kumar and; S.B. Sanyal, Sr. Advs.,;

Sema, J. 1. These two appeals arise out of a common judgment and order passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Gurgaon, convicting the appellants in Sessions Case No. 32 of 1995 and sentenced them to...

Raghunandan Sharma Vs. Delhi Transport Corporation and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Delhi Transport Corporation Act, 1950 - Sections 12(1)

Reported in : 1994IIAD(Delhi)349; 54(1994)DLT370; 1994(29)DRJ151

Arun Kumar, J. (1) The question for determination in this writ petition and several other connected writ petitions is whether persons holding the post of Depot Manager in the Delhi Transport Corporation are empowered to take...

Manjit Singh and anr. Vs. State of Punjab and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.2042 OF 201.Manjit Singh & Anr. … Appellants versus State of Punjab & Anr. … Respondents WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS. 2276-2278 OF 201.Amarjot Singh …...

Gian Chand and ors. Vs. State of Haryana

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Narcotics

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.2302 of 2010 Gian Chand & Ors. …Appellants Versus State of Haryana …Respondent JUDGMENT Dr. B.S. Chauhan, J.1. This appeal has been filed against...

Akash Singh Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :17. h APRIL, 2014 DECIDED ON :29. h APRIL, 2014 + CRL.A. 45/2011 AKASH SINGH ..... Appellant Through : Mr.J.P.Dhanda, Advocate. versus GOVT. OF...

Vinod Goyal . Vs. Vishranti City Residents Welfare Society .

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Shree Pal Singh

CA No....... OF2017@ SLP (C) No.29919 OF2016REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.19962 OF2017(Arising out of SLP(C) No.29919 of 2016) VINOD GOYAL & OTHERS …Appellants Versus VISHRANTI CITY RESIDENTS WELFARE...

Ravinder Parkash and anr. Vs. State of Haryana

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : AIR2002SC3494; 2003(1)ALT(Cri)309; 2002CriLJ4714; JT2002(8)SC89; RLW2003(1)SC36; (2002)8SCC426

Advocate for Appellant : U.U. Lalit,; Ajay Siwach and; S.K. Sabharwal, Advs

Santosh Hegde, J. 1. The appellants have preferred this appeal against the judgment and conviction imposed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Rohtak in his judgment dated 6.11.1995 made in Sessions Case No. 93/93 as confirmed by...

Maqsoodan Vs. State of Haryana

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2002)10SCC97

ORDER  1. Mr J.P. Dhanda, Advocate enters appearance for the respondent State.  2. Leave granted.  3. On the fact situation, particularly since the appellant is a lady, and in view of the relatively less serious offence...