Advanced Search Results

Muthu Cycle Stores Vs. M.Dhanajayan

Court : Chennai

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960 - Section 25, 10(3)(c)

Advocate for Appellant : Mr.Inamdar Ameenur Rahman, Adv.

Petition filed under section 25 of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960 against the Judgment and decree dated 11.08.2009 made in RCA.54 of 2008 on the file of the VIII Judge, Court...

Bhogwati Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Inco ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income-tax Act, 1961 - Sections 147

Reported in : (2004)188CTR(Bom)393; [2004]269ITR186(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : S.N. Inamdar and ;G. Krishna, Advs.

V.C. Daga, J.1. This writ petition is directed against the notices issued under Section 147 of the IT Act, 1961 ('Act' for short), seeking to reopen assessments for the asst. yrs. 1982-83 and 1983-84. The basic...

Dy. Cit Vs. Rajneesh Foundation

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Pune

Subject : Education

Reported in : (2001)73TTJ(Pune.)649

The vital issue raised in this appeal by the revenue is whether the assessee is a public charitable trust as claimed by it and is eligible for exemption under sections 11 and 12 of the Income...

Megji Mathradas Vs. Joint Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2000)75ITD52(Mum.)

1. The assessee in this appeal is a partnership firm engaged in the business of processing of textiles. It runs a unit in the name of M/s Bombay Union Dyeing Mills. The business was carried on...

The Commissioner of Income Tax-ii Vs. M/S. Brahma Associates

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Income Tax

Acts : Income Tax Act,1961 - Section 80IB(10); Wealth Tax Act, 1957 - Section 2(ea)

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Vimal Gupta; Abhay Ahuja, Advs.

1. Although this appeal was admitted on 01/12/2009 on only question, at the hearing of the appeal counsel on both sides agreed that all the questions raised in the appeal be admitted and heard on merits....

The Special Tahsildar Vs. Prema

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr.P.Pasupatheeswaran, Adv.

Prayer: Appeal filed under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act against the Judgment made in L.A.O.P.No.2 of 1993 dated 07.08.2006 on the file of Subordinate Judge, Tirupattur.JUDGMENTR.BANUMATHI,J1. Being aggrieved by the enhancement of compensation from Rs.10,000/-...

Major D.M. Purandare Vs. Income-tax Officer

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Pune

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2000)72ITD55(Pune.)

1. The only issue arising out of this appeal relates to the manner of computation of the deduction provided in Section 48(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.2. The brief facts of the case are these. The...

Major D. M. Purandare Vs. Income-tax Officer

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Pune

Subject : Direct Taxation

1. The only issue arising out of this appeal relates to the manner of computation of the deduction provided in s. 48(2) of the IT Act, 1961.2. The brief facts of the case are these. The...

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. H.R. Karandikar

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 4(1) and 256(2)

Reported in : (1981)20CTR(Bom)196; [1981]6TAXMAN242(Bom)

Chandurkar, J.1. The question which has been referred to us under s. 256(2) of the I. T. Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'), is as follows :'Whether there was any evidence in support of...

The Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Nima Specific Family Trust

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 80 HH, 80-I, 90 and 260-A; Finance Act, 1980; Taxation Law Amendment Act, 1975

Reported in : 2001(2)ALLMR314; (2001)165CTR(Bom)518; [2001]248ITR29(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. R.V. Desai and ;P.S. Jetley, Advs. and i/b ;R.N. Bandopadhyay

S. H. Kapadia, J. 1. The following question of law has been raised by the department in this Appeal under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act : Whether the assessee was entitled to claim 40%...