Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: mr i c kumar · Page 1 of about 10 results (0.715 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 03 2002

Grafitek International Vs. K.K. Kaura and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-03-2002

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 3 - Rule 1 - Order 37; Evidence Act - Sections 85

Reported in : 2002IIIAD(Delhi)485; 96(2002)DLT385; 2002(62)DRJ72

Advocate for Appellant : Rajiv Nayar, Sr. Adv. and; Pratibha Singh, Adv

J.D. Kapoor, J.1. Through this application leave to defend the suit for recovery filed under the summary procedure of Order 37 CPC has been sought on multifarious grounds.2. At the outset, Mr. I.C. kumar, learned counsel...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 26 2017

Manju Sipayya vs.director of Education and Ors

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Oct-26-2017

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. M. Dutta, Mr. I.C. Kumar, Ms. Jyoti Janeja, Mr. Sachin Chauhan, Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, Ms. Niti Jain

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:26. h October, 2017 + W.P.(C) No.7129/2012 MANJU SIPAYYA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. M. Dutta and Mr. I.C. Kumar, Advocates DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION AND...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 24 1994

Punjab and Sind Bank Vs. M/S. Manjit Properties Private Ltd. and Other ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-24-1994

Subject : BankingCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 11 - Order 37; Delhi High Court (Original Side) Rules, 1967 - Order 19, Rule 1

Reported in : AIR1995Delhi22

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. A.S. Chandiok and; Ms. Rita Aggarwal, Advs

ORDER1. As far back as in the year 1982 the plaintiff Bank had instituted this suit under Order 37 of the Code of Civil Procedure for the recovery of Rs. 21,73,825. The defendants were granted leave...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jan 09 2012

Dr.A.D.Kumar and ors Vs. Gian Chand Kumar and ors

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-09-2012

Subject : Education

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved On: January 03, 2012 Judgment Delivered On: January 09, 2012 + RFA(OS) 19/1997 DR.A.D.KUMAR and ORS. ..... Appellants Through: Mr.M.Dutta, Advocate. versus...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 23 2000

Grafitek International Vs. K.K. Kaura and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-23-2000

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 37, Rule 4

Reported in : 2000(56)DRJ692

Advocate for Appellant : Maninder Singh and; Pratibha K. Singh, Advs

Vikramajit Sen, J. 1. This application has been filed in a suit for the, recovery of Rs. 12,65,532.40 filed under the Summary procedure of Order xxxvI of the Code of Civil Procedure. On 30.7.1998 summons and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 12 1993

Punjab and Sind Bank Vs. Manjit Singh and anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Nov-12-1993

Subject : Limitation

Acts : Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 5

Reported in : 1993IVAD(Delhi)753; 1993(27)DRJ612

Advocate for Appellant : A.S. Chandhiok,; Amar Gupta and; I.C. Kumar, Advs

Sat Pal, J.(1) is 3 259/92 has been filed on behalf of the defendants under Order 9 Rule 13 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure (for short called 'the Code') for setting...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 14 1991

Asha Khanna and anr. Vs. Vishnu Charan

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-14-1991

Subject : Property

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 17; Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 - Sections 124

Reported in : 1991RLR251

Advocate for Appellant : S.P. Srivastava,; Rajiv Nanda and; A.S. Chandhiok, Advs

Mahinder Narain, J. (1) It is stated by Vishnu Charan, deft. who is present in person, that he is not in a position to lead any evidence. (2) Trial of the matter was fixed yesterday and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 04 2019

Manju Sipayya vs.directorate of Education and Ors

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Nov-04-2019

Subject : Education

$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI LPA. 808/2017 Judgment Reserved on :14. h August, 2019 Judgment Pronounced on:4th November, 2019 MANJU SIPAYYA ....Appellant Through Mr. M. Dutta and Mr....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 11 2001

Shri G.C. Kumar and Others Vs. Shri Ashok Kumar and Others

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-11-2001

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 2, 33 and 96 - Order 20, Rule 6; Court Fee Act, 1870 - Sections 11

Reported in : 2001IVAD(Delhi)1001; AIR2001Delhi338; 92(2001)DLT1; 2001(59)DRJ322

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. I.C. Kumar, Adv

ORDERDevinder Gupta. J.1. This is an application seeking review of the order passed by us on 6.9.2000. in FAO(OS) No.127/2000.2. ON 6.9.2000 appeal filed by the appellants against the order 23.3.2000 by learned Single Judge of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 17 1999

K.P. Soni and anr. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-17-1999

Subject : Municipal Tax

Acts : Delhi Municipal Corporation Act - Sections 114 and 116; Constitution of India - Article 276

Reported in : 1999VAD(Delhi)678; 81(1999)DLT347; 1999(51)DRJ46

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. K.L. Rathee and; Mr. I. C. Kumar, Advs

ORDERArun Kumar, J.1. The only point urged by the learned counsel for the petitioner is that Section 116 of the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act which provides the basis for determination of property tax to be levied...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial