Advanced Search Results
Parekh Automobiles and ors. Vs. Municipal Council and anr.
Rajasthan
Jan-28-1977
Other Taxes
1977WLN(UC)137
Mr. Hastimal
M.L. Joshi, J.1. These two writ petitions challenge the validity of the levy as the octroi on the petroleum products by the Municipal Council Jodhpur sell from depot of the Indian Oil Corporation at Jodhpur, hereinafter...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJagdish Vs. Collector
Rajasthan
Aug-01-1978
Civil
1978WLN(UC)319
Mr. Hastimal
D.P. Gupta, J.1. This writ petition was taken up today for final hearing with the. consent of the learned Counsel for the parties.2. The petitioner, in this case, has urged that the Collector, Sri Ganganagar has...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKrishna Kumar Bansal and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Rajasthan
Sep-08-1979
CivilCommercial
1979WLN(UC)303
Mr. H.M. Parekh, Mr. Hastimal Parekh
ORDER. No. 944/77 No. 1(509)/77-MIV New Delhi, the 25-10-77Shri Krishan Kumar Bansal s/o Sri R.P. Bansal, and Shri R K. Mittal s/o Shri B. P. Mittal, Makrana, Distt. Nagaur (Rajasthan)Subject :-- Revision application dated nil received...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
J.K. Synthetics Vs. Municipal Council, Kota
Rajasthan
Mar-08-1988
Municipal Tax
Rajasthan Municipalities Act, 1959 - Sections 104, 139, 141(1), 143, 149, 271 and 271(1); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 9 and 80
AIR1989Raj51; 1988(2)WLN487
H.P. Parekh, Adv.
N.C. Sharma, J.1.This second appeal is directed by the plaintiff-Company against the decree of the Additional District Judge, Kota, dated May 7, 1976 whereby the decree of the Munsif (South) Kota, dated December 16, 1974, dismissing...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBrig. B. Lall Vs. Wealth-tax Officer, A-ward and anr.
Rajasthan
Feb-26-1980
Direct Taxation
Wealth Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 16A, 16A(1), 16A(6) and 17(1)
(1980)15CTR(Raj)180; [1981]127ITR308(Raj)
L.R. Mehta and; Rajendra Mehta, Advs.
G.M. Lodha, J.1. Evasion, avoidance or tax dodging has always posed a perennial problem for the revenue. The Direct Taxation Enquiry Committee, headed by Chief Justice K. N. Wanchoo, suggested latest ways andmethods, to plug loopholes...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVivek Prakash Mathur Vs. State of Rajasthan and anr.
Rajasthan
May-25-1988
Service
1988(2)WLN471
Mr. Marudhar Mridul
N.C. Sharma, J.1. This common order will dispose of the preliminary objection as to the maintainability of the above writ petitions filed in this Court by Shri Vivek Prakash Mathur, Shri M.L. Chaurasia and Richpal Singh...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShiv NaraIn and ors. Vs. Mst. Raji and ors.
Rajasthan
Mar-31-1981
FamilyProperty
Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 41; Hindu Law; Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Sections 14
AIR1982Raj119
L.R. Mehta, Adv.
Dwarka Prasad, J.1. This second appeal has been filed against the judgment and decree passed by the learned District Judge, Jodhpur on Mar. 30, 1968 and arises in the following circumstances.2. One Chaturbhuj had four sons,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBachh Raj Vs. Sunder Mal and ors.
Rajasthan
Nov-02-1962
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 11 and 100 - Order 32, Rules 2, 2(2), 3 and 3(1); Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 17(1) and 49; Marwar Registration Act, 1934 - Sections 17(1); Marwar Patta Ordinance, 1921; Transfer of Property Act, 1882
AIR1963Raj119
Srikishan Mal Lodha, Adv.
Chhangani, J. 1. This is a defendant's second appeal against the judgment and decree of the District Judge, Pali, dated 31st March, 1955. The plaintiff-respondents have also filed cross-objections. They initially came up before a Single...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIndian Airlines Corporation and ors. Vs. Ram Niwas Laduram and ors.
Rajasthan
Oct-17-1968
Civil
1968WLN103
C.M. Lodha, J.1. The above three matters arise out of suit No. 10 of 1967 pending in the Court of District Judge, Merta. Miscellaneous Appeal No. 13 of 1968 has been filed by defendants No. 1...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskK.L. Rajpurohit Vs. University of Jodhpur
Rajasthan
Aug-17-1982
Constitution
1982WLN592
Guman Mal Lodha, J.1. A Researcher prays for Judges research by evaluation, interpretation and examination of the scheme of Ordinance of Ph. D Chapter instead of submitting to the 'Veto' of the Research Board. He has...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Next ›
- Last »