Advanced Search Results

Pratiksha Pravin Raut Vs. Additional Collector, District Raigad and Ot ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Election

Oral Judgment:1. Rule was issued in this petition on 26 August 2014 and the same was made returnable in the last week of September 2014. The matter has today come up for final disposal.2. The challenge...

Shivaji University Teachers Association (SUTA) and Others Vs. The Stat ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Education

A.S. Gadkari, J. 1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. By consent of the parties, the petition is heard finally at the stage of admission itself. 2. Petitioner Nos.2 to 19 are the retired teachers from the...

Anant Nathu Mankar and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 307, 506, 504, 34, 324, 326; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) (Cr.P.C) - Section 313

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. C.G.Gavnekar And Ors.

: 1 This appeal assails the judgment and order of the Additional Sessions Judge, Mangaon, District Raigad convicting the appellants of the offences punishable under Sections 307, 506, 504 all read with Section 34 of I.P.C....

Shree Hanuman Mandir, Alibag, Public Trust Through Its Trustees and Ot ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Gavnekar

Heard Mr. Gavnekar, learned Counsel for petitioners and Ms Godse, learned Counsel for respondent Nos.1 and 2 at length. 2. By this Application under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short 'C.P.C.'),...

Kavita Sakharam Chavan and ors. Vs. Commissioner, Konkan Division and ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Election

Acts : Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958 - Sections 145(1A)

Reported in : 2002(4)ALLMR741; 2003(2)BomCR821

Advocate for Appellant : C.G. Gavnekar, ;V.S. Khanavkar, ;Deepa Sawant, Advs.

H.L. Gokhale, J.1. This writ petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is filed by a woman Sarpanch (who is the 1st petitioner herein) and two members of Village Panchayat (i.e. petitioners Nos. 2...

Tatyasaheb Ramchandra Kale Vs. Navnath Tukaram Kakde and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Education

S.C. Gupte, J. Admitted. Taken up for hearing forthwith by consent of parties. 1 In this appeal, the Appellant has challenged an order passed by a learned Single Judge of this court in a writ petition...

The Jasai Grampanchayat Through Its Sarpanch Vs. the State of Maharash ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958 - Sections 4, 4(2), 124(5) and 155; Constitution of India - Article 243

Reported in : 2005(3)ALLMR596; 2005(4)BomCR502

Advocate for Appellant : M.S. Karnik, Adv.

H.L. Gokhale, J.1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties.2. This petition filed by the Jasai Grampanchayat situated in Taluka Uran of District Raigad, seeks to challenge the order dated 18th November 2003 passed by the...

Shashikant Bajirao Pagare Vs. State of Maharshtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 366 and 376

Reported in : 1982(1)BomCR931

Advocate for Appellant : C.G. Gavvnekar and ; Jadhav, Advs.

R.A. Jahagirdar, J.1. The petitioner, hereinafter referred to as 'the accused' has been convicted by the learned Sessions Judge of Nasik in Sessions Case No. 76 of 1981 for offences punishable under sections 366 and 376...

Karad Merchant Sahakari Credit Sanstha Maryadit and Others Vs. Reserve ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

M.S. Sonak, J. 1. Rule. With the consent of the learned counsel appearing for the parties Rule is made returnable forthwith. 2. As substantially common issues of fact and law arise in these two Petitions, the...

Shri Vithal Govind Toke and Others Vs. Smt. Drupadabai Chima Gayakwad ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Tenancy Property

Acts : Bombay Inferior Village Watans Abolition Act, 1958 - Sections 2, 4, 5, 6, 8 and 9; Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 - Sections 32

Reported in : 1999(1)ALLMR723; 1999(2)BomCR140; 1999(1)MhLj878

Advocate for Appellant : R.S. Apte, Adv.

ORDERT.K. Chandrashekhara Das, J.1. As these petitions give rise to common questions of law on almost identical facts, they can conveniently be disposed of by this common judgment.2. The petitioners, claiming to be lessees under the...