Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: mr f e d · Page 1 of about 4 results (0.687 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Oct 28 2013

Vishwanath Namdeo Patil and Others Vs. the Official Liquidator of M/S ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-28-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

A short but important question that arises in this matter is, up to which date the dues of workmen are to be calculated when a Company is wound up. Whether the Companies Act, 1956 provides the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 23 1996

Vinod Ramchandra Gosalka Vs. Sunil Dattatray Tatkare and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-23-1996

Subject : Election

Acts : Representation of People's Act, 1951 - Sections 81(3), 83(1), 86(1) and 86(3)

Reported in : 1997(3)BomCR110

Advocate for Appellant : B.D. Joshi, ;F.D. D'vitre, ;Manoj Bhatt, ;Nusrat Shah and ;C.J. Pooniwala, Advs.

R.G. Vaidyanatha, J.1. These are four Election Petitions filed by the respective petitioners challenging the election of returned candidates. In all these cases the respective respondents have taken a preliminary objection about the maintainability of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 18 2011

Naina D. Kamani Vs. Janson Engineering and Trading Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-18-2011

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act. 1956 - Section 433(g), 313, 285 to 290, 287(2), 174, 433(f), 193 , 283, 397, 398, 53(2)(b); Bombay Rent Act 1947 - Section 13(4); Code of Civil Procedure(C.P.C) - Order 34

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. F.E. D

Top of Form 1. The Plaintiff is one of the permanent Directors of Defendant No.1 Company. Defendant Nos. 2 and 3 are two other permanent Directors of Defendant No.1. The Company essentially owns one residential building....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 14 2011

Great Pacific Navigation (Holdings) Corporation Ltd. Vs. M. V. Tongli ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-14-2011

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Geneva Convention of 1999 called Arrest Convention of 1999 - Article 3 (2); Commercial Documents Evidence Act, 1939 ; Merchant Shipping Act, 1894 - Section 503; Supreme Court Act, 1981 - Section 37; Administration of Justice Act, 1956 - Section 3(4); High court (Admiralty Jurisdiction) Act - Section 4(4); Supreme Court Act 1981 - Section 21(4); Merchant Shipping Act, 1958 - Section 71; Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Section 9

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. F. E. D

1. The appellant (the Plaintiff in the Suit) has challenged the order of the learned Single Judge of this Court dated 12 July 2011 raising the arrest of the respondent-ship, Tongli Yantai in the Notice of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial