Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: mr dinesh mathur · Page 1 of about 64 results (0.115 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 18 2006

Anurag Singh Vs. the State (Through Nct of Delhi)

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-18-2006

Subject : Civil

Acts : Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 - Sections 20, 21, 25 and 26; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - 173(8); Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B, 201, 419, 420, 467, 468 and 471

Reported in : 2006(88)DRJ777

Advocate for Appellant : D.C. Mathur, Sr Adv.,; Ramesh Gupta,; Rebcca M. John,;

Badar Durrez Ahmed, J. 1. On 27.03.2006, when this matter was taken up for hearing, my learned predecessor had indicated in the order the broad arguments advanced by the counsel for the parties. It was noted...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 26 2001

Jasvinder Singh Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-26-2001

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120B and 420; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 438 and 439; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 27;

Reported in : 2001IVAD(Delhi)605; 91(2001)DLT230; 2001(59)DRJ567

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Dinesh Mathur, Senior Advocate and; Mr. Anees Ahmed, Adv

ORDERR.C. Chopra, J.1. The petitioner has come to this Court praying for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter referred to as 'the Code' only) in case FIR No.178/2001 lodged at...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 10 2026

E Trav Tech Limited vs Union of India & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-10-2026

Subject : Right to Information

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Santhosh Krishnan

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Judgment Reserved on: 17.02.2026Judgment delivered on: 10.03.2026Judgment uploaded on: As per Digital Signature~+ W.P.(C) 1562/2026 CM APPL. 7584/2026 CM APPL. 9785/2026 E TRAV TECH LIMITED .....Petitioner...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Nov 04 2016

Mahender Yadav vs.central Bureau of Investigation

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Nov-04-2016

Subject : Criminal

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Vikas Singh, Mr. Vikas Arora, Mr. Radhika Arora, Mr. Manish Sharma, Mr. R.S. Cheema, Mr. D.P. Singh, Ms. Tarannum Cheema, Ms. Hiral Gupta, Mr. Manu Mishra, Mr. Harinder Bains, Mr. H.S. Phoolka, Ms. Kamna Vohra

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + + Reserved on :24. h October, 2016 Date of Decision:04. h November, 2016 Crl.M.A.No.15239/2016 in CRL.A. No.715/2013 MAHENDER YADAV ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Vikas Singh,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 08 1999

J. Joseph Vs. Shri A.P. Nandy

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-08-1999

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 482; Constitution of India - Article 21; Foreign Exchange Regulation Act - Sections 56

Reported in : 1999CriLJ3090; 79(1999)DLT541; 1999(49)DRJ649; 1999(66)ECC87

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. D.C. Mathur, Senior Advocate,; Mr. S.S. Sindhi, Adv

ORDERD.K. Jain, J.1. By this petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short the Code), the petitioner prays for quashing of the criminal complaint filed against him on 26 June, 1985...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 20 2009

Sanjeev Nanda Vs. the State

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-20-2009

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 183, 184, 185, 185(1), 203 and 204; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 85, 201, 299, 299(3), 279, 300, 300(4), 302, 304, 304A, 311, 420 and 498A; Evidence Act - Sections 3, 6, 25, 27, 45, 74, 145 and 165; Road Safety Act, 1967 - Sections 1(1); Road Traffic Act, 1972 - Sections 6(1) and 10(2); Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 117; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 2, 36, 161, 161(3), 162, 162(1), 164, 165, 172(2), 173, 173(2), 173(8), 258, 309, 310, 311, 313, 340, 360 and 482; Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 - Sections 66; Immoral Traffic in Women and Girls Act, 1956; Probation of Offenders Act; Constitution of India - Articles 21, 39A, 136, 226 and 227; Bar Council of India Rules - Rules 16 and 252A

Reported in : 160(2009)DLT775

Advocate for Appellant : Ram Jethmalani and; Siddharth Luthra, Sr. Adv.,; R.N. Karan

Kailash Gambhir, J.The miracle is not to fly in air or to travel to the moon, but to walk on the earth', says a Chinese proverb.1. The increase in vehicular traffic alongwith the population of Delhi...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 14 2007

Shibu Soren Vs. C.B.i.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-14-2007

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act - Sections 8 and 10; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B, 302 and 364; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 164 and 313

Reported in : 2007(95)DRJ545

Advocate for Appellant : Dinesh Mathur, Sr. Adv.,; Barun K. Sinha,; Sanjiv Kumar

Manmohan Sarin, J.1. Vide judgment dated 28th November, 2006 and order of sentence dated 5th December, 2006, appellant Shibu Soren had been convicted for the offences punishable under Sections 120B read with Section 364/302 IPC. He...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 03 2018

r.s. Dahiya vs.state (Through Nct of Delhi)

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-03-2018

Subject : Criminal

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. Sushil Kumar

$~ * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI12h May, 2017 Judgment Reserved on Judgment Pronounced on ____December, 2017 Judgment Pronounced on 3rd January, 2018 + CRL.A. 54/2004 R.S. DAHIYA Through : Mr.D.C.Mathur,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 03 2018

Anil Kumar vs.state

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-03-2018

Subject : Criminal

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. Sushil Kumar

$~ * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI12h May, 2017 Judgment Reserved on Judgment Pronounced on ____December, 2017 Judgment Pronounced on 3rd January, 2018 + CRL.A. 54/2004 R.S. DAHIYA Through : Mr.D.C.Mathur,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 03 2018

Sher Singh vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-03-2018

Subject : Criminal

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. Sushil Kumar

$~ * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI12h May, 2017 Judgment Reserved on Judgment Pronounced on ____December, 2017 Judgment Pronounced on 3rd January, 2018 + CRL.A. 54/2004 R.S. DAHIYA Through : Mr.D.C.Mathur,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial