Advanced Search Results
Batra Construction Co. Vs. D.D.A. and Another
Delhi
Oct-23-1998
Arbitration
Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 30 and 33
1999IAD(Delhi)67
Mr. D.P. Sharma, Adv
ORDERDr. M.K. Sharma, J.1. The petitioner was awarded the work contract for construction of some dwelling units at Dilshad Garden, Delhi by the respondent No.1 and a contract was executed between the parties. During the course...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRamakant Sharma S/O Shri Suraj Pd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) Through
Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi
Dec-07-2006
Land Acquisition
Shri. D.P. Sharma
1. Ramakant Sharma, Senior Mail Sorter (RMS), Jhansi, in this OA seeks quashing of penalty as imposed vide order dated 03.1.2005 making recovery of Rs. 41,473/- @ Rs. 1,000/- per month being the alleged loss suffered...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSamar Ali Miyan Vs. the State of West Bengal
Supreme Court of India
Jan-09-1975
Civil
Maintenance of Internal Security Act, 1971 - Sections 3(2)(1)
AIR1975SC1631; 1975(7)LC165(SC)
BHAGWATI, J.1. The petitioner challenges an order of detention dated 8th December, 1973 made by the District Magistrate, Darjeeling under sub-section (1) read with sub-section (2) of Section 3 of the Maintenance of Internal Security Act,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Sher Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) Thr. Defense Secretary and ors.
Delhi
Mar-07-2006
Service
Administration Tribunal Act, 1985 - Sections 22(3)(F); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 47, Rule 1; Constitution of India - Articles 226, 311 and 311(2); Armed Forces Headquarters Clerical Service Rules, 1968
2006(88)DRJ468
G.K. Aggarwal, Adv
Sanjiv Khanna, J.1. The petitioner Mr. Sher Singh has filed this writ petition against the order dated 11th September, 2003 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal dismissing the original application being OA NO. 274/2003 and against...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCwp No.17270 of 2012 Vs. State of Haryana and Others
Punjab and Haryana
Feb-07-2014
Labour and Industrial
CWP No.17270 of 2012 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.17270 of 2012 Date of decision:07.02.2014 Deep Narain & others ....Petitioners Versus State of Haryana & others ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskS.S. Jetly Vs. Delhi Development Authority and ors.
Delhi
Jan-18-1994
Arbitration
Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 14(2)
1994IAD(Delhi)365; 1994(1)ARBLR273(Delhi); 53(1994)DLT709
D.P. Sharma,; Vivekanand,; J.K. Midha and;
Mohd. Sharnim, J. (1) This is a petition under Section 14(2) of the Arbitration Act for issue of a direction to respondent No. 3, arbitrator, to file the award and to deal with the same in...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSri Ram Manchanda Vs. Union of India (Uoi)
Delhi
Jan-21-1986
Arbitration
Arbitration Act - Sections 20
1986(1)ARBLR218(Delhi); 29(1986)DLT294
D.P. Sharma, Adv
D.P. Wadhwa, J.1. The is a petition under Section 20 of the Arbitration Act.2. The Petitioner, a contractor who works in the name of Vishal Construction Company was awarded the work of widening and extension of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMehta and Co. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)
Delhi
Mar-10-1983
ArbitrationContract
Arbitration Act - Sections 20
1983(5)DRJ171; 1983RLR467
D.P. Sharma, Adv
Charanjit Talwar, J.1. The petitioner, M/s. Metha & Company is a registered partnership firm carrying on business as contractors and builders at Jullundur City. It entered into a contract with the Union of India for construction...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskManagement Committee Tagore Vidya Bhawan Vs. State of Rajasthan and or ...
Rajasthan
Nov-22-2006
Service
RLW2007(2)Raj1060
Sharma, J.1. By this review petition the petitioner seeks to recall the order dated July 18, 2002. The first and foremost requirement of entertaining a review petition is that the order, review of which is sought,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKataria Construction Vs. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
Delhi
Sep-15-1993
Arbitration
Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 33
1993(27)DRJ500
D.P. Sharma and; M. Chopra, Advs
Sat Pal, J. (1) This petition under section 33 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act' ) has been filed by the petitioner for a declaration that there was no valid and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next ›
- Last »