Advanced Search Results

Unit Trust of India and Others Vs. Om Prakash Berlia and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Company

Acts : Capital Issues (Control) Act, 1947 - Sections 3(2) and 4(2); Companies Act, 1956 Sections 2(12), 8(1A), 45, 47, 75, 81, 81(A), 81(1), 81(1A), 81(3), 85, 108, 108D, 144, 155, 187C, 187D, 247, 293, 293(1) and 408(1)

Reported in : [1983]54CompCas723(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Cooper

Gadgil, J.1. These four appeals arise out of a decree in Suit No. 1108 of 1981 of the file of the original side of this court wherein the learned single judge has passed a decree directing...

The Commissioner of Sales Tax Vs. Messrs. Economic Traders.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (1976)5CTR(Bom)0254B

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Cooper

Madon, J. - The reference under section 61(1) of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959, made at the instance of the Commissioner of Sales Tax appears to us, in the light of subsequent facts, to be...

Shiv Kumar Tulsian and Another Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Company

Acts : Banking Regulation Act, 1949 - Sections 45(1), 45(2), 45(3) and 45(4); Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19 and 31A

Reported in : [1990]68CompCas720(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Cooper

1. The first petitioner is a shareholder of the third respondent, Hindustan Commercial Bank Ltd. (hereinbefore called 'the HCB'). The second petitioners are a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, and are also shareholders of...

Om Prakash Berlia and Another Vs. Unit Trust of India and Others (No. ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 75, 80, 81, 81(1), 81(1A), 81(3), 81(3), 85, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 108, 108A, 108D, 155, 166, 293 and 408

Reported in : [1983]54CompCas469(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Cooper

INTRODUCTION1. This is a suit for rectification of the register of shares of the National Rayon Corporation Ltd., the 8th defendant. Rectification is sought in respect of 43,750 shares standing in the names of the Unit...

Narotamdas Trikamdas Toprani Vs. Bombay Dyeing and Manufacturing Co. L ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 118, 163(2), 209(4), 209A and 439

Reported in : (1986)88BOMLR649; [1990]68CompCas300(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Cooper, Mr. Kotval

1. The plaintiff is a debenture-holder in the Bombay Dyeing and Mfg Co. Ltd., the first defendant herein. He has filed the present suit on behalf of himself and other debenture-holders of the first and third...

Tri-sure India Ltd. Vs. A.F. Ferguson and Co. and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 4,10, 23, 23(2), 34, 39, 120B, 209(1), 209(5), 211, 227, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 633

Reported in : [1987]61CompCas548(Bom)

M.L. Pendse, J.1. The plaintiffs, Tri-Sure India Ltd., have instituted this suit on September 20, 1978, for recovery of sum of Rs. 63,84,792 with interest thereon at the rate of 16.25% per annum from the date...

Apar Private Ltd. and Others Vs. Union of India and Others Overruled

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 2, 2(23), 2(25), 2(27), 2(28), 5, 11, 12, 12(1), 13, 14, 14(1), 14(2), 15, 15(1), 17, 20, 21, 22, 23, 25, 25(1), 25(2), 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 37, 38, 42, 45, 46, 46(1), 48, 49, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 66(1), 68, 69, 77, 79, 80, 110(1), 111 and 150; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 10; Customs Tariff Act, 1975

Reported in : 1986(1)BomCR196; (1986)88BOMLR355; 1985(6)ECC241; 1988(19)LC514(Bombay); 1985(22)ELT644(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Cooper

Madhava Reddy, C.J.1. Four questions arising under the Customs Act, 1962 (52 of 1962) are referred to the Full Bench and they are :-1. Under the Customs Act, 1962, when can the event of importation be...

Standard Batteries Ltd. Vs. Casings (India) Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Arbitration

Reported in : (1979)81BOMLR331

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Cooper

Bharucha, J.1. A neat question of some importance arises in this matter: - Is an application or suit filed under the provisions of Section 20 of the Arbitration Act, 1940, a suit within the meaning of...

Jetu Jacques Taru Lalvani and Another Vs. J.B.A. Printing Inks Limited ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 31, 43A, 75, 177, 179, 397, 398, 402, 403, 433 and 439

Reported in : 1996(2)BomCR593; (1997)97BOMLR566; [1997]88CompCas759(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : K.S. Cooper, ;Mudnani, ;Soli K. Cooper, ;V.R. Dhond and ;Ms. Madhavi Goradia, Advs., i/b., ;Kanga and Co.

A.P. Shah, J.1. This company application taken out by the original petitioners seeks leave to amend the company petition and further seeks interim injunction to restrain the respondent from acting on the resolution passed in the...

Killick Nixon Limited and Others Vs. Bank of India and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act 1956 - Sections 2(27), 41, 41(1), 41(2), 60, 75, 111, 114, 155, 210, 397, 398, 399, 399(1) and 399(3)

Reported in : 1983(2)BomCR631; [1985]57CompCas831(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Cooper

Mrs. Sujata Manohar, J.1. Five petitioners have filed this petition under ss. 397 and 398 of the Companies Act, 1956, against Killick Nixon Ltd. and the other respondents. The petitioners are the Bank of India, the...