Advanced Search Results

Sterling Foods Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 5, 28, 66 and 80HH

Reported in : (1991)95CTR(Kar)36; [1991]190ITR275(KAR); [1991]190ITR275(Karn)

Advocate for Appellant : Ashok Kulkarni, Adv. for ;K.R. Prasad

M.P. Chandrakantharaj Urs., J.1. In this income-tax reference case, the following question is referred to us for our answer : 'Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in...

Titanide Coating (P) Ltd. Vs. Assistant Collector of Customs

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Customs

Reported in : 1993(42)ECC28; 1993(67)ELT260(Kar); 1993(1)KarLJ367

ORDER1. The writ petition was filed on 2nd June 1988 challenging the seizure proceedings made on 29th April 1988 with a consequential prayer to restrain the respondents from proceeding with any further action in the matter...

Wipro Infotech Ltd. Vs. C.E.G.A.T.

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 35 and 35F

Reported in : 1994(48)ECC223; 1995(75)ELT266(Kar); ILR1994KAR3224; 1994(5)KarLJ217

Advocate for Appellant : Shri Rajesh Chander Kumar, Sr. Adv.

Tirath Singh Thakur, J.1. These writ appeals arise out of an order passed by a learned single Judge of this court dated 14-7-1994 dismissing writ petitions Nos. 7469 to 7471/1994. A few facts relevant for the...

Akash Films Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 28, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 35A, 35E, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 40A, 40A(3), 41, 42, 43 and 43A

Reported in : (1991)95CTR(Kar)156; [1991]190ITR32(KAR); [1991]190ITR32(Karn); 1991(1)KarLJ275

Advocate for Appellant : K.R. Parasad, Adv.

K. Shivashankar Bhat, J.1. The following question of law is referred for our answer at the instance of the assessee under the provisions of the Income-tax Act, 1961 ('the Act' for short) : 'On the facts...

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. R.G. Mundkur

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Wealth Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 7

Reported in : [1991]189ITR597(KAR); [1991]189ITR597(Karn)

Advocate for Appellant : Chander Kumar, ;Shivaprakash and ;R.G. Mundkur, Advs.

K. Shivashankar Bhat, J. 1. These two references are under the provisions of the Wealth-tax Act at the instance of the Revenue. The respondent (hereinafter referred as 'assessee') was a member of the Government Servant's Co-operative...

Wipro Limited Vs. Asstt. Commissioner of Customs, Madras

Court : Chennai

Subject : Customs

Reported in : 1996(81)ELT28(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : Shri G. Chander Kumar, ;Sr. Counsel for M/s. R. Raghavan

ORDER1. Petitioner has imported goods which have been described by it as computer parts and accessories. The ship arrived on 13-6-1995. The bills of entry in respect of these items were filed between 14-7-1995 and 2-8-1995....

Rekha Surangi and Others Vs. State of Punjab and Another

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Land Acquisition

Crl. Misc. not M-30272 o”1. .IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. not M- 30272 of 2012 (O&M) Date of Decision : November 21, 2012 Rekha Surangi and others ...Petitioners Versus...

Shri Himanshu Gupta vs the Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service Tax

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Prem Ranjan Kumar

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIDate of decision: 15th January, 2026 + CEAC NO. 48/2018 SHRI HIMANSHU GUPTA D-21, MODEL TOWN, PART-II, DELHI-110009 .....APPELLANT Through: Mr. Prem Ranjan Kumar, Advocate (through VC)VersusTHE...

Ranjit Singh Vs. State of Punjab and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Education

CWP No.16278 of 2011 (O&M) - 1- LPA No.609 of 2013 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.16278 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision :02. 04.2013 Ranjit Singh ...Petitioner Versus...

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. K. Shyamaraju (Trustees)

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 3, 21, 21(1), 160, 161, 161(1), 161(1A), 164(3), 256 and 263

Reported in : (1991)93CTR(Kar)76; [1991]189ITR392(KAR); [1991]189ITR392(Karn); 1991(1)KarLJ233

Advocate for Appellant : G. Chander kumar, Adv.

M.P. Chandrakantaraj Urs, J. 1. We propose to dispose of these petitions by the following common order inasmuch as the questions of law involved are the same. 2. The facts of the cases fall within a...