Advanced Search Results

Bapu and Others Vs. State of Maharashtra and Others

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

Subject : Criminal

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. C.V.Thombre

S.S. Shinde, J. 1. Criminal Appeal No.596/2011 is filed by the original accused and Criminal Appeal No.437/2014 is filed by the original complainant, praying for enhancement of the sentence. Since both these Criminal Appeals are arising...

Shivappa S/O Bhujangappa Bembale Vs. State of Maharashtra and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service

Acts : Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982 - Rules 30, 57 and 110

Reported in : 2005(6)BomCR437; 2005(3)MhLj709

Advocate for Appellant : Vivek Dhage, Adv.

P.B. Gaikwad, J.1. Petitioner Shivappa s/o Bhujangappa Bembale has filed present Writ Petition against Zilla Parishad through its Chief Executive Officer and requested for direction to regularise his services as a Peon w.e.f. 24-7-1970; further direction...

Govindrao Vs. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Education

Oral Judgment: 1. Heard Mr. S.W. Munde, the learned Counsel for the appellant. Heard Mr. S.B. Pulkundwar, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, for the respondent no.1. Heard Mr. C.V. Thombre, the learned Counsel for the respondent...

Govindrao Vs. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

Subject : Education

Oral Judgment: 1. Heard Mr. S.W. Munde, the learned Counsel for the appellant. Heard Mr. S.B. Pulkundwar, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, for the respondent no.1. Heard Mr. C.V. Thombre, the learned Counsel for the respondent...

Rama S/O Kondiba Khade Vs. Sk. Sakir S/O Sk. Kachru and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 140; Maharashtra Motor Vehicles Rules 1989 - Rule 260(3)

Reported in : 2004ACJ1370; 2004(1)MhLj971

Advocate for Appellant : R.M. Borde

D. S. Zoting, J.1. Heard Mr. R.M. Borde, learned Counsel for the appellant. Mr. C.V. Thombre, learned Counsel for respondent No. 1 and Mr. S.K. Naikwade, learned Counsel, for respondent No. 2.2. Admit.With consent of the...

Rama Vs. Sk. Sakir and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : InsuranceMotor Vehicles

Reported in : I(2005)ACC508

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. R.M. Borde

D.S. Zoting, J.1. Heard Mr. R.M. Borde, learned Counsel for the appellant. Mr. C.V. Thombre, learned Counsel for respondent No. 1 and Mr. S.K. Naikwade, the learned Counsel for respondent No. 2.2. Admit. With consent of...

State of Maharashtra Vs. Vimlabai and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 302, 307 and 498A

Reported in : 2006CriLJ3118; I(2007)DMC157

Advocate for Appellant : U.K. Patil, A.P.P.

P.S. Brahme, J.1. Heard Mr. U. K. Patil, A.P.P. for the appellant-State & Mr. C.V. Thombre, advocate for Respondents.2. This Criminal Appeal is against the judgment and order, passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Latur in...

Quazi Syed SalahuddIn Vs. the State of Maharashtra and Another

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

Subject : Education

Oral Judgment: 1. Heard petitioner in person, learned A.P.P. for State and Mr. C.V. Thombre, learned counsel for respondent No.2. 2. Admit. Heard finally with the consent of parties. 3. In the present Writ Petition, the...

Ramdas Shriram Chaudhari Vs. Guna Kondu Dhanger,

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Limitation

Acts : Limitation Act - Schedule - Articles 64 and 135

Reported in : 2004(2)ALLMR518

Advocate for Appellant : V.B. Patil, Adv.

D.S. Zoting, J.1. Heard Mr. V. B. Patil, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Arun D. Kulkarni, advocate, holding for Mr. C.V. Thombre, learned counsel for the respondents. 2. Rule, returnable forthwith, by consent of...